Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Decoding the code - China's new General Civil Law Rules: the first step towards a comprehensive civil code
    2017-03-15

    Decoding the code - China's new General Civil Law Rules: the first step towards a comprehensive civil code June 2017 Decoding the code - China's new General Civil Law Rules: the first step towards a comprehensive civil code June 2017 1 Overview and background On 15 March 2017, the People's Republic of China General Civil Law Rules (中华人民共和国 民法总则) (hereinafter referred to as the "GCLR") were formally adopted at the Fifth Session of the Twelfth National People's Congress. The GCLR will enter into force on 1 October 2017.

    Filed under:
    China, Company & Commercial, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Hogan Lovells, Statute of limitations, Liquidated damages
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    经典案例丨上市公司因虚假陈述被处罚并不必然赔偿股民损失——金杜代理新疆某上市公司一审胜诉
    2017-03-20

    新疆某上市公司(下称“公司”)因信息披露违规被中国证监会行政处罚,引发众多股民对公司提起证券虚假陈述民事赔偿诉讼(下称“本案”),金杜代理公司应诉。近期,新疆某中级法院就本案作出一审判决,驳回股民全部诉讼请求。

    本案系典型的证券虚假陈述民事赔偿诉讼。该类案件因涉及股民众多、索赔金额高、专业性强,往往引发资本市场高度关注。从以往的案例来看,上市公司被行政处罚后引发的股民诉讼,法院判决驳回原告全部诉讼请求的案例极为罕见。本案中,金杜基于以往处理类似案件的丰富经验和专业把握,针对本案的案情特点,有针对性地提出了上市公司不应承担股民损失的答辩意见,最终得到法院支持。这是金杜代理上市公司成功应对股民提起证券虚假陈述民事赔偿诉讼的又一经典案例。

    案情简介

    2014年7月,中国证监会作出《行政处罚决定书》,认定公司连续多年虚构购销业务,虚增业务收入与成本,虚增或者虚减利润,导致公司2006年至2011年年报存在信息披露违规问题。

    截止目前,本案共有70余名股民对公司提起证券虚假陈述民事赔偿诉讼,此外,还有批量股民以律师函的方式向公司进行索赔。

    本案主要争议焦点及金杜整体应对思路

    Filed under:
    China, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, King & Wood Mallesons, Security (finance)
    Authors:
    Zhang Baosheng
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    King & Wood Mallesons
    INSOL 2017: Indonesia, China and India - Where Are We and What’s Next?
    2017-03-22

    The giants of Asia – Indonesia, China, and India – raise many opportunities and challenges for insolvency practitioners. Baker McKenzie’s own Andi Kadir spoke this morning about some of the solutions to those problems, showcasing his significant experience with insolvency reforms and opportunities in Indonesia.

    Andi highlighted the benefits of the Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang regime as a restructuring tool in Indonesia. A PKPU is a debtor in possession mechanism, somewhat like a blend of a US Chapter 11 administration with aspects of the insolvency laws of the Netherlands.

    Filed under:
    China, India, Indonesia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Baker McKenzie
    Authors:
    Ian Innes , Kwun-Yee Cheung , Rian Matthews
    Location:
    China, India, Indonesia
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Hanjin Shipping - Current jurisdictional status and options - China
    2016-10-04

    The Chinese Maritime Courts are not obliged to recognise and/or enforce foreign courts' orders, therefore Hanjin's creditors could still arrest Hanjin-related vessels in China if they have maritime claims (recognised under Chinese law) against the registered owners and/or bareboat charterers of the said vessels.

    Container leasing companies and bunker suppliers could also file applications in order to request that the corresponding Chinese Maritime Courts order Hanjin to return the leased containers to Hanjin or the bunkers supplied to Hanjin in certain circumstances.

    Filed under:
    China, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Clyde & Co LLP
    Authors:
    Leslie Shen , Ik Wei Chong
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    China Streamlines Foreign Investment - New Filing Regime
    2016-10-11

    On October 8, 2016, China’s Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) published the Provisional Administrative Rules on Foreign-Invested Enterprises’ Establishment and Amendment(《外商投资企业设立及变更备案管理暂行办法》), effective immediately.

    Filed under:
    China, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Paul Hastings LLP, Ministry of Commerce (China)
    Authors:
    Meka Meng , Sophie Han
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Paul Hastings LLP
    PRC Launches Information Website for Bankrupt Enterprises and Sets Up Bankruptcy Courts
    2016-10-13

    Dispute Resolution Beijing/Hong Kong/Shanghai Client Alert PRC Launches Information Website for Bankrupt Enterprises and Sets Up Bankruptcy Courts Recent developments The People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) recently launched two initiatives in relation to enterprise bankruptcies. On 1 August 2016, the Supreme People’s Court (the “SPC”) launched the Information Website for National Bankrupt Enterprises Recombinational Cases (the “Website”).

    Filed under:
    China, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    The PRC court registration system for bankruptcy petitions - latest developments and implication for the application of Automatic Early Termination in OTC financial derivative transactions
    2016-11-22

    An insolvent enterprise incorporated in Mainland China (“PRC”) or its creditors (“Applicant”) may institute a bankruptcy proceeding against the insolvent enterprise under the PRC Enterprise Bankruptcy Law (“Bankruptcy Law”) by the filing of a bankruptcy petition. There have long been complaints by industry practitioners that PRC courts are reluctant to register bankruptcy petitions.

    Filed under:
    China, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons
    Authors:
    Minny Siu , Richard Mazzochi , Hao Zhaohui (Daryl) , Gao Feng (James)
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    King & Wood Mallesons
    中国法院受理破产申请的立案登记制度 - 场外金融衍生产品交易中适用自动提前终止的最新动向和启示
    2016-11-22

    任何在中国内地(“”)注册成立的企业,如不能清偿到期债务,并且资产不足以清偿全部债务或者明显缺乏清偿能力的,可由该企业或其债权人(“”)提交破产申请,继而根据《中华人民共和国企业破产法》(“《破产法》”)对该企业发起破产法律程序。但是,长期以来,备受业内人士诟病的是,中国法院迟迟未对破产申请实施立案登记制度。在此背景下,最高人民法院(“”)于2016年7月颁布指导通知[1](“《2016年最高院通知》”),旨在简化和规范登记破产案件的立案受理工作。

    最高院通知:优化立案程序

    Filed under:
    China, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons
    Authors:
    Hao Zhaohui (Daryl) , Minny Siu , Richard Mazzochi , Guan Feng (James)
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    King & Wood Mallesons
    Choice of Venue and Maritime Lien Claims
    2016-12-06

    Preferred maritime liens can raise challenging issues during maritime disputes—especially during bankruptcy. Creditors may encounter problems when filing for seizure due to their unique nature, with venue is becoming a determining factor.

    Filed under:
    China, Global, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Dentons
    Authors:
    George (Yingbo) Wang
    Location:
    China, Global, USA
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Moral hazard hits China ‒ be prepared for the fallout
    2016-12-08

    We are seeing attempts by the Chinese Government to provide the market with more sophisticated tools for dealing with unprofitable companies.

    China is attempting to align its insolvency regime to international standards and introduce additional tools for dealing with the country's rising debt load.

    Australian lenders with exposures to these debts (particularly in the coal, steel, manufacturing, cement, shipbuilding, solar, heavy machinery, mining and property sectors) should reassess insolvency risk and understand their options.

    Filed under:
    China, Insolvency & Restructuring, Clayton Utz
    Authors:
    Nick Poole , Anthony Burke
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Clayton Utz

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • Current page 32
    • Page 33
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • Page 36
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days