Perhaps against expectations, 2024 included considerable bankruptcy activity in the U.S. However, the number of filings under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code, which implements the UN Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency and provides bankruptcy courts authority to recognize foreign insolvency proceedings, enforce orders of the foreign court, and grant related relief and assistance, remained close to preceding years.
The restructuring of Houston-headquartered McDermott International, a global engineering group, was the biggest and most important restructuring in 2023/24 in terms of jurisdictions involved, innovation, degree of opposition and quantum. Against fierce opposition in multiple jurisdictions, the debtors successfully consummated this c.$5 billion restructuring via a U.K.
Author’s Note: This is an edited excerpt from the author’s forthcoming master’s thesis, a larger-scope comparative study on “wrongful trading” in England under Insolvency Act 1986, s 214 and the tort of “deepening insolvency” in some U.S. states.
The ABI International Latin America Insolvency Symposium took place in Mexico City Sept. 8-10, 2024, bringing together prominent bankruptcy judges and experienced practitioners. The event provided a comprehensive exploration of Latin America’s evolving insolvency and economic landscape, offering attendees practical insights and opportunities to deepen their professional connections.
In cross-border restructuring cases, frequently there is a U.S. or U.K. parent company and a German subsidiary. In a crisis, the managing director of the German entity often has a hard time explaining to the parent company what the duties are under German law if there is a crisis. From a U.S./U.K. perspective, the managing directors seem to be “wetting their pants” for no reason. This article wants to show that the dangers are all too real.
As your co-chairs, we are very excited to welcome new members to the committee and also look forward to connecting with long-time committee members. Thanks to those who have contributed articles to this newsletter (and to Simon Eickmann and Olya Antle for acting as editors). Special thanks to Evelyn Meltzer for her service as co-chair of the International Committee over the past two years, and a warm welcome to Ken Kraft as the incoming co-chair.
This article deals with the controversial practice of a Polish debtor being a capital company entering a multi-million M&A procedure by dividing assets and transferring part of the assets to a new shell company, in which the ownership structure was created on the model of the old company.
The English Supreme Court has dismissed an equitable personal claim in knowing receipt brought by Saad Investments Co. Ltd. and its joint liquidators (Saad) against a Saudi Arabian financial institution, and in doing so provided welcome elucidation on the cause of action — the law on which “has perplexed judges and academics alike for several decades.”[1]
Courts administering India’s insolvency and restructuring law, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (IBC), have been grappling with the challenges posed by corporate group insolvencies. Many Indian businesses operate through family-controlled group structures, and their insolvency has been a matter of considerable public concern in India in recent years, particularly with real estate development groups.[1]
Global investor activity means a sudden increase in interest in the crypto-asset market.
Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:
Join now or Try us out for 30 days