Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    CMS Expert Guide to restructuring and insolvency law
    2020-09-01

    Restructurings, especially those involving multiple jurisdictions, are invariably complex matters. This CMS Expert Guide provides an overview of the various restructuring possibilities available in a large number of countries, allowing you to compare how the options are deployed in these jurisdictions.

    We intend to update it periodically to reflect important changes as they happen.

    If you need more information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    Filed under:
    Angola, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, European Union, France, Germany, Global, Hungary, Italy, Kenya, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, USA, Banking, Company & Commercial, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, CMS Germany, Brexit, Due diligence, Coronavirus, Court of Justice of the European Union
    Location:
    Angola, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, European Union, France, Germany, Global, Hungary, Italy, Kenya, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    CMS Germany
    Security with an expiration date - a recent decision on set-off in Austrian insolvency proceedings and highlights on set-off in insolvency proceedings in other CEE countries
    2016-04-04

    The right to set-off claims and obligations in insolvency proceedings is an important tool for creditors in order to protect themselves against the insolvency risk of a contractual counterparty. This article gives a short overview of the rules for set-off in insolvency proceedings in Austria and certain CEE jurisdictions not taking into account special provisions for close-out netting and similar transactions.

    Austria

    Set-off in insolvency proceedings

    Filed under:
    Austria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schoenherr, Debtor
    Authors:
    Miriam Simsa , Sona Hekelová , Marcin Antczak , Ozren Ivkovic , Gergely Szalóki
    Location:
    Austria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia
    Firm:
    Schoenherr
    CMS guide to restructuring, insolvency and distressed debt trading in Europe
    2011-04-26

    This guide provides a comparative analysis of certain key areas of law and procedure for those involved in or affected by financial distress of a corporation and the trading of distressed debt across Europe.

    Filed under:
    Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, European Union, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, CMS Legal, Distressed securities
    Location:
    Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, European Union, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    CMS Legal
    Slovenia: Subordinated Bondholders vs. State Aid: 0:1
    2017-01-17

    In December 2013, the Bank of Slovenia adopted exceptional measures resulting in the annulment of financial instruments held by shareholders and subordinated bondholders for the purpose of burden-sharing in rescuing five Slovenian banks.1 In its decision of 19 July 2016, the European Court of Justice confirmed that such burden-sharing is not contrary to EU law; however, the Slovenian public remains divided.

    Filed under:
    European Union, Slovenia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Schoenherr, European Commission, Court of Justice of the European Union
    Authors:
    Urša Kranjc
    Location:
    European Union, Slovenia
    Firm:
    Schoenherr
    Lex Mercator Passed in Slovenia in Response to Agrokor's Distress
    2017-04-27

    The New Law Aims at Protecting Entities against the Negative Effects of Insolvency by their Majority Owners

    Filed under:
    Slovenia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wolf Theiss, Privately held company
    Authors:
    Markus Bruckmüller
    Location:
    Slovenia
    Firm:
    Wolf Theiss
    Review of the Slovenian anti-corona law package proposal with a particular focus on moratorium of loans, enforcement and insolvency proceedings
    2020-04-01

    This week the Slovenian Government sent a new law - the first big anti-corona law package - the Intervention Measures to Mitigate the Effects of the coronavirus (COVID-19) Infectious Disease Epidemic on Citizens and the Economy Act into the legislative procedure.

    Filed under:
    Slovenia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    Maja Erker Žgajnar , Irena Šik Bukovnik , Maja Šipek
    Location:
    Slovenia
    Firm:
    CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz
    A closer look at the temporary regulation of insolvency proceednings and court-sponsored financial restructurings in Slovenia due to the COVID-19 epidemics
    2020-04-09

    All insolvency proceedings (bankruptcy, and compulsory settlement) and court-sponsored financial restructurings (preventivna prestrukturiranja) in Slovenia are on hold until the recall of the COVID-19 epidemic (proceedings are currently expected to be on hold until 1 July 2020) (the "Recall"). During this time courts will not conduct the above-mentioned proceedings and no procedural and material deadlines will run.

    Filed under:
    Slovenia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    Maja Erker Žgajnar , Irena Šik Bukovnik
    Location:
    Slovenia
    Firm:
    CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz
    Bills of exchange in Enforcement Procedure
    2011-03-01

    Recent amendments to the Enforcement Procedure and the Interim Protection Act facilitate repayment in enforcement proceedings.

    Introduction

    Bills of exchange are mostly regulated by the sector specific act of 1946 (based on provisions of three 1930’s Geneva conventions). Provisions of other acts (eg, Obligation Code; Obligacijski zakonik) are used secondarily if the Bill of Exchange Act (Zakon o menici) does not contain applicable provisions.

    Filed under:
    Slovenia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Schoenherr, Surety, Debtor, Security (finance), Interest, Writ, Capital punishment, Power of attorney
    Authors:
    Ana Filipov
    Location:
    Slovenia
    Firm:
    Schoenherr
    Insolvency legislation faces its first real test
    2011-03-07

    The economic crisis presents a real-life test for the Slovenian insolvency legislation, unequalled in its young history. Numerous insolvency proceedings against Slovene companies have revealed several serious flaws of the Insolvency Act and forced the legislator into continuous amendments.

    Filed under:
    Slovenia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Schoenherr, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Credit risk, Entrepreneurship, Fourth Amendment, Default (finance), Sole proprietorship
    Authors:
    Jernej Jeraj , Matthias Wahl
    Location:
    Slovenia
    Firm:
    Schoenherr
    Corporate recovery and insolvency
    2012-06-14

    The Slovenian legislation includes the following types of in rem securities relating to: (i) real properties – mortgage (hipoteka), land debt (zemljiški dolg), real encumbrance (stvarno breme); and (ii) movables and property rights, respectively – pledge (zastavna pravica), retention of title (pridržek lastninske pravice), transfers by way of security (prenos v zavarovanje), and assignment by way of security (odstop v zavarovanje).

    Filed under:
    Slovenia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Schoenherr, In rem jurisdiction, Title retention clause
    Location:
    Slovenia
    Firm:
    Schoenherr

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Current page 2
    • Page 3
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days