Samantha Gilbert speaks to compliance leaders from the healthcare, financial services, insurance, IT and commercial sectors on what to expect from the new “business as usual” and enforcement. Conduct reviews, increased regulatory scrutiny and long-term digitisation are some key issues for compliance teams to prepare for.
In brief
The following measures introduced as a COVID-19 response are now to be extended:
Days ago a lawyer's answer to these questions would have been the all too often heard "well, it depends". There would have been a serious risk of any such adjudication being stopped by the court granting a mandatory injunction to halt it. Ask the same questions again now and the response would be a resounding "yes and yes!"
Welcome to the inaugural edition of our new newsletter, which is intended to capture the key developments in the English disputes arena over the past three months. We hope that you will find it an interesting read, whether you are a litigator, either in private practice or in-house, or a generalist wanting to keep abreast of the goings on in this space. We also hope that you will pass it on to any of your colleagues who may find it useful.
What’s changing?
Businesses like safeguards when they enter into any venture with a third party. For example, they like to have the option of exiting an arrangement with a business that has run into financial difficulties – so that they can avoid any related obligations and risks. UK contracts therefore often include a mechanism to allow termination of an agreement if a party enters into an insolvency process (e.g. administration). However, an imminent change to UK law means that this will not always be an option in the future.
The new UK legislation for companies in financial difficulty represents a fundamental shift in approach to restructuring in Europe and adds an important new tool to the UK restructuring framework. The availability of a plan proposed under the new Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 (a “Restructuring Plan”) will undoubtedly change how many distressed companies seek to address their financial difficulties. However, until case law is developed, there will remain considerable uncertainty as to how the Restructuring Plan will work in practice.
1. Summary
The Supreme Court decision in Bresco Electrical Services Ltd (In Liquidation) v- Michael J Lonsdale Electrical Ltd handed down on 17 June 2020 is both timely and significant given the "new normal" that we are all now operating within. In the current economic climate of "lockdown" and the present economic downturn that is now occurring, the worlds of construction and insolvency are now likely to interact and collide on a more frequent basis.
There may now be little time for the voluntary re-scheduling of lease payments due on and after the June 2020 quarter day. Andrew Walker QC explores the reasons why.
Lexology Pro Compliancetakes a look at some of the most informative articles published on Lexology this fortnight for compliance teams to stay up-to-date, including key guidance from regulators around the world and practical tips to help businesses adapt to a new normal.
For some time we have been following with interest the case of Bresco Electrical Services Ltd (in liquidation) v Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Ltd as it progresses through the courts. Why? Because this concerns an important question which comes up time and time again: are the regimes of construction adjudication and insolvency set off compatible?