Skip to main content
Home
Enter a keyword

Main navigation

Menu
  • US Law
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America
  • Headlines
  • Education Resources
    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Covid 19
    • Conferences and Webinars
    • Newsletters
    • Publications
  • Firm Articles
  • About Us
    • ABI International Board Committee
    • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
  • Join ABI

Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025
2021-12-21

In the case of Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025 (Anchorage v Sparkes), the Supreme Court of NSW considered the obligations of company officers to sophisticated commercial lending entities, and whether company officers could be personally liable for making misleading statements.

Significance

Filed under:
Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP
Authors:
Jacques Jacobs
Location:
Australia
Firm:
Clyde & Co LLP
View Original Article
King & Wood Mallesons' submission on corporate insolvency in Australia
2022-12-01

Overview of this submission

Filed under:
Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons, Mediation, Coronavirus, Insolvency, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Location:
Australia
Firm:
King & Wood Mallesons
View Original Article
Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025
2021-12-21

In the case of Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025 (Anchorage v Sparkes), the Supreme Court of NSW considered the obligations of company officers to sophisticated commercial lending entities, and whether company officers could be personally liable for making misleading statements.

Significance

Filed under:
Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP
Authors:
Jacques Jacobs
Location:
Australia
Firm:
Clyde & Co LLP
View Original Article
King & Wood Mallesons' submission on corporate insolvency in Australia
2022-12-01

Overview of this submission

Filed under:
Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons, Mediation, Coronavirus, Insolvency, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Location:
Australia
Firm:
King & Wood Mallesons
View Original Article
Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025
2021-12-21

In the case of Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025 (Anchorage v Sparkes), the Supreme Court of NSW considered the obligations of company officers to sophisticated commercial lending entities, and whether company officers could be personally liable for making misleading statements.

Significance

Filed under:
Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP
Authors:
Jacques Jacobs
Location:
Australia
Firm:
Clyde & Co LLP
View Original Article
King & Wood Mallesons' submission on corporate insolvency in Australia
2022-12-01

Overview of this submission

Filed under:
Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons, Mediation, Coronavirus, Insolvency, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Location:
Australia
Firm:
King & Wood Mallesons
View Original Article
Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025
2021-12-21

In the case of Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025 (Anchorage v Sparkes), the Supreme Court of NSW considered the obligations of company officers to sophisticated commercial lending entities, and whether company officers could be personally liable for making misleading statements.

Significance

Filed under:
Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP
Authors:
Jacques Jacobs
Location:
Australia
Firm:
Clyde & Co LLP
View Original Article
King & Wood Mallesons' submission on corporate insolvency in Australia
2022-12-01

Overview of this submission

Filed under:
Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons, Mediation, Coronavirus, Insolvency, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Location:
Australia
Firm:
King & Wood Mallesons
View Original Article
Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025
2021-12-21

In the case of Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025 (Anchorage v Sparkes), the Supreme Court of NSW considered the obligations of company officers to sophisticated commercial lending entities, and whether company officers could be personally liable for making misleading statements.

Significance

Filed under:
Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP
Authors:
Jacques Jacobs
Location:
Australia
Firm:
Clyde & Co LLP
View Original Article
King & Wood Mallesons' submission on corporate insolvency in Australia
2022-12-01

Overview of this submission

Filed under:
Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons, Mediation, Coronavirus, Insolvency, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Location:
Australia
Firm:
King & Wood Mallesons
View Original Article

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page Last »

Footer menu

  • Publications
  • Newsletters
  • ABI International Board Committee

© 2022 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved