In a recent decision, In the matter of Toys “R” Us ANZ Limited (subject to deed of company arrangement) [2025] FCA 1135, the Federal Court provided important clarification as to its discretionary power to permit the administrator of a deed of company arrangement to transfer share in the company.
The decision of the Federal Court inTrue North Copper Limited (Administrators Appointed) [2024] FCA 1329 demonstrates the exercise of the Court’s discretion in giving effect to the objects of Pt 5.3A of theCorporations Act 2001 (Cth), whilst offering protection to administrators against liabilities which may arise when making commercial decisions in the course of discharging their duties effectively.
Introduction
Inthe matter of Trinco (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liq) [2025] NSWSC 993, the New South Wales Supreme Court found Mr Azizi to be a de facto director of Trinco (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liq) (Trinco) and liable for insolvent trading. Trinco’s liquidator was awarded compensation, payable by Mr Azizi.
The High Court of Australia (being Australia’s highest court) refused special leave to appeal the Full Federal Court’s decision inCEG Direct Securities Pty Ltd v Cooper (as liquidator)[2025] FCAFC 47. The Court held that the Full Court’s decision turned on the application of the relevant provision to the particular facts of that case and did not raise any broader question of principle.
Written by - James Conomos
Over the past few years, Australia’s construction sector has been facing unprecedented pressure, and by mid-2025, the effects have become painfully clear. Dozens of major construction companies across Queensland and nationally have gone under, leaving behind unfinished projects, unpaid contractors, and thousands of affected workers.
Australia's energy and utilities sector faces unprecedented challenges as the industry undergoes a fundamental transformation. The transition to renewable energy, regulatory pressures, aging infrastructure, and volatile commodity prices have created a complex web of operating and financial pressures which often require sophisticated restructuring strategies, including potentially via external administrations.
This week’s TGIF considers the recent Supreme Court decision of Re ML & NB Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 444. It concerns the extent to which a plaintiff can rely on a statutory demand issued by a supporting creditor to satisfy the presumption of insolvency.
Key takeaways
A recent Federal Court decision has provided some useful insights on how related party loans will be considered in an insolvency context, particularly in relation to unreasonable director-related claims against directors and their relatives. For insolvency practitioners it also provides insight into how the assignment of claims might effectively be used to mitigate litigation risks.
Introduction
For corporate groups considering an internal reorganisation, a restructure effected via section 413 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) under a scheme of arrangement (Corporate Restructure Scheme) provides a flexible alternative to more orthodox approaches commonly adopted. As is well known, the Corporations Act enables a corporation to enter into a scheme of arrangement with its creditors or members (or any class of them). Schemes of arrangement are commonly used to implement agreed mergers, as an alternative to the comparatively rigid mechanism of a takeover bid.
The retail and hospitality sector in Australia remains relatively steady in terms of financial performance. However, retailers, including those in hospitality, continue to be faced with some persistent headwinds and difficult trading conditions. In our three (3) part series, we cover some of the challenges facing Australian businesses in the sector, including those exposed to external administrations, the strategies that are working via administration, and how early intervention and turnaround strategies can help preserve long term enterprise value for stakeholders.