Many Irish businesses face the challenge of meeting warehoused debt. One option available is to address the debt via the Small Company Administrative Rescue Process (“SCARP”).
Government Schemes
During the Covid-19 pandemic, a lot of Irish companies took advantage of Government schemes, to include the Employment Wage Subsidy Scheme (“EWSS”), the Covid Restrictions Support Scheme (“CRSS”) and Debt Warehousing. PAYE, PRSI, USC, EWSS and CRSS overpayments were all warehoused.
What is Debt Warehousing?
In a landmark decision,[1] the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed, for the first time, the precise duties that a controlling stockholder owes, and the standard of review that will apply, when a controlling stockholder takes actions to block a board of directors’ desired course of action — such as by removing directors or enacting a bylaw requiring a unanimous vote for board action
On January 2, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed an amicus curiae brief urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to reverse a district court’s decision finding that a debt collector lacked the requisite knowledge and intent to violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) when it sent a debt-collection communication prior to any knowledge of the debtor’s bankruptcy filing.
We have recently published a few blogs on the hot topic of company insolvencies, including more specifically about:
Weiß ein Forderungsverkäufer von der Zahlungsunfähigkeit seines Schuldners, muss sich der Factor diese Kenntnis im Rahmen eines echten Factorings nicht allein deshalb zurechnen lassen, weil der Factoringvertrag Informations- und Unterstützungspflichten des Forderungsverkäufers vorsieht.
Überblick
Key points
The English High Court decision of Hunt v Singh [2023] EWHC 1784 (Ch) has provided the most substantive authority on directors' duties to creditors since the decision of the Supreme Court in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and others [2022] UKSC 25 (“Sequana”). The case specifically considered the point at which a director’s duty to take into account the interests of creditors arises.
Whether you are starting a new venture, or you have been a company director for several years, you must understand your responsibilities.
Not complying with directors’ duties can lead to disqualification, financial penalties, and even imprisonment.
In this article, you will find the scope of directors’ duties, as set out in the Companies Act 2006 and other legislation such as the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of January 15, 2024.
摘要
市场经济交易中，企业以自有财产对外抵押，提供担保的情形屡见不鲜。上述企业进入破产程序后，易引发破产法与担保法交叉问题。破产企业以自有财产为第三人的债务提供抵押，主债权债务发生于债权人（抵押权人）与第三人之间，抵押权人若在抵押人的破产程序中主张权利，管理人审查认定过程中，易与破产企业为自己的债务提供抵押混淆，单纯的抵押权人可能被认定为“抵押债权人”。本文立足于物权和债权的二分性原则，探讨了在破产程序中，对破产企业仅享有抵押权的权利人的权利认定与行权规则。
关键词
抵押权人 别除权 别除权人 权利行使