Firm Posts
A new Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals opinion[fn. 1] involves the motion of a federal inmate, who was also a Chapter 7 bankruptcy debtor, for compassionate-release under 18 U.S. § 3582(c)(1)(A). The new Seventh Circuit opinion denies the motion.
Notably, the bankruptcy Debtor/Inmate is serving a 30-year sentence for making false statements during a bankruptcy proceeding The bankruptcy statute is 18 U.S.C. § 152, which declares it is a crime when a person:
Key takeaways
Welcome to our latest quarterly bulletin which contains updates on commercial litigation developments over the past three months, largely by reference to articles posted to our Litigation Notes blog in that period. Other posts are available on the blog, which you can visit any time. Or subscribe to be notified of the latest updates: https://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/notes/litigation.
Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 144 S. Ct. 2017 (June 27, 2024)
In the early 2000s, the conversation around the standards for a good faith filing in bankruptcy was intense, particularly leading up to the passage of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA). Concerns were widespread that bankruptcy provisions were vulnerable to abuse, prompting a national debate on what could constitute a bad-faith filing. Nearly 20 years later, the landscape has evolved significantly. The financial crisis of 2008 brought unprecedented mortgage foreclosures and forced a larger segment of the population to consider bankruptcy.
Il nuovo articolo di Angelo Zambelli pubblicato oggi nel supplemento: “Crisi d’Impresa, il correttivo” de Il Sole 24 Ore
自主清算程序相对更加灵活,可根据实际情况灵活调整清算策略,因此退出效率会更高。破产清算需要根据企业破产法的规定履行相应的程序流程并受法院监督,清产核资、拍卖处置资产也是时间不可控的程序,原则上破产清算周期更长。尽管如此,从破产管理人的选派程序和破产清算的申请流程看,破产管理人由法院指定,而后从破产申请到清算程序终止的一系列工作,均由破产管理人负责开展,公司股东工作量极大减少。
图:源自投中网
虽然过去五年国有资本的参股投资行为在投资金额上并不领先,但其项目数量远超并购及新股发行认购行为。与此相对应的是,国务院国资委于2023年6月23日发布了《国有企业参股管理暂行办法》(国资发改革规〔2023〕41号)(简称“暂行办法”),该办法对国有资本的投资、管理、退出进行了规范,标志着国资监管向强化国有企业参股管理迈进了一大步。《暂行办法》将适用范围扩大至所有国资委履行出资人职责的企业及其子企业,而不仅局限于中央企业[1]。
在投资方面,该办法对国有资本进行了谦抑化规范,严控非主业投资,例如第六条要求国有资产投资“坚持聚焦主责主业,符合企业发展战略规划,严控非主业投资,不得通过参股等方式开展投资项目负面清单规定的禁止类业务”。
I. Introduction
When a company is in financial distress, directors face difficult choices. Should they trade on to try to “trade out” of the company’s financial difficulties or should they file for insolvency? If they act too soon, will creditors complain that they should have done more to save the business? A recent English High Court case raises the prospect of directors potentially being held to account for decisions that “merely postpone the inevitable.”
The bankruptcy of the Mt. Gox cryptocurrency exchange in 2014 was a pivotal moment in cryptocurrency history. It demonstrated the vulnerabilities of early cryptocurrencies and saw the worst fears of the industry become a reality. However, in the years since it has also provided an excellent example of the successful tracing and recovery of a variety of asset classes. Creditors have recently received the first distributions from the recovered assets of Mt Gox, in stark contrast to the initial claims that access to the assets had been lost forever.
Background