On 15 December 2025, the Dutch Council of State (CoS; in Dutch: Raad van State) issued a critical opinion on the draft bill on transfer of undertaking in bankruptcy (In Dutch: Wet overgang van onderneming in faillissement, the WOVOF).

As economic pressures mount and corporate distress becomes increasingly prevalent, lenders and borrowers alike are seeking proactive strategies to safeguard their interests without resorting to immediate enforcement action or commence other restructuring or insolvency proceedings. Whilst lenders typically prefer to avoid the costs and complexities of accelerating loans or enforcing security, they require effective mechanisms to monitor deteriorating financial positions of the borrower and maintain influence over critical business decisions. 

Voor veel mensen betekent een bestuursfunctie binnen een vereniging een betrokken, maatschappelijk engagement. Maar wie bestuursverantwoordelijkheid op zich neemt, draagt ook juridische risico’s. Zeker wanneer de vereniging in financiële problemen raakt. Wat veel bestuurders niet beseffen, is dat zij onder omstandigheden persoonlijk kunnen worden aangesproken voor financiële tekorten na een faillissement.

For many people, a board position within an association means a committed, civic engagement. But those who assume board responsibility also bear legal risks. Especially when the association gets into financial trouble. What many directors do not realize is that, under circumstances, they can be personally liable for financial shortfalls after a bankruptcy.

This article offers insight into when and why directors of associations can be held liable, what legal frameworks underlie this, and how to reduce the risk of personal claims.

After a bankruptcy is declared, the director does not disappear from the picture. Although the trustee takes over the liquidation, the former director may be personally liable for the deficit in the estate or for damages suffered by individual creditors. This article clearly explains when liability is imminent and what measures you can take in advance.

Trustee versus director

Na het uitspreken van een faillissement verdwijnt de bestuurder niet uit beeld. Hoewel de curator de afwikkeling overneemt, kan de voormalige bestuurder persoonlijk opdraaien voor het tekort in de boedel of voor schade van individuele schuldeisers. Dit artikel zet helder uiteen wanneer aansprakelijkheid dreigt en welke maatregelen u vooraf kunt nemen.

Curator versus bestuurder

On 21 March 2025, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that a taxpayer is allowed to deduct a liquidation loss on its participation in a liquidated subsidiary that transferred losses to group companies under the Irish group relief regime in the years prior to the liquidation. This Supreme Court judgment provides a favorable outcome for taxpayers.

Background

Key points

The legal landscape in the field of restructuring and insolvency is evolving, driven by legislative measures and judicial practice.

In 2025, the following developments can help you navigate complex financial landscapes, protect assets, and make informed decisions to address financial challenges ensuring survival or orderly dissolution when facing financial distress.

Introduction

Dissolution of a company can take place in several ways in the Netherlands. One of these options is turboliquidation, a procedure described in Article 2:19 paragraph 4 of the Dutch Civil Code (BW). The essence of this is that at the time of the dissolution decision, there must no longer be any assets present in the company.