Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Privy Council clarifies the scope of the just and equitable winding up jurisdiction in Aquapoint LP
    1969-12-31
    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mourant, Liquidation, Articles of association, NASDAQ
    Authors:
    Nicholas Fox , Jessica Vickers , Lissette Williams-Fernandez
    Firm:
    Mourant
    Avoiding The Nuclear Option: Buyout Orders In Just And Equitable Winding Up Proceedings
    2026-04-20

    With the Cayman Islands being a preferred jurisdiction for the incorporation of investment vehicles, inevitably cases will arise where non-controlling shareholders complain that they are being unfairly prejudiced by conduct of those in control, and necessarily pursue those complaints by way of proceedings to wind up the subject company on the just and equitable ground.

    Filed under:
    Cayman Islands, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Appleby, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Andrew Jackson
    Location:
    Cayman Islands
    Firm:
    Appleby
    High Court refuses “unprecedented” application to appoint examiner
    2026-04-10

    In what was deemed an “unprecedented” application, the High Court recently refused to confirm the appointment of an interim examiner to a special purpose vehicle incorporated to develop commercial property. The Court determined that the company was not the “type of company for which examinership was designed”. The decision highlights some of the factors that the Court will consider when exercising its discretion to confirm the appointment of an examiner.

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mason Hayes & Curran, Insolvency
    Authors:
    James Morrin , Aaron C. Garavaglia
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    Mason Hayes & Curran
    Professional services disputes and insolvency: Q1 2026 signals persistent pressure
    <br>
    1969-12-31
    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, RPC, Insolvency, Insolvency Service (UK)
    Authors:
    James Parsons , Daniel Charity
    Firm:
    RPC
    Restructuring plans in Scotland
    2026-04-10

    The statutory restructuring plan mechanism, introduced by the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020, introduced a flexible, court-sanctioned tool to rescue financially distressed businesses. The take-up in England and Wales has been widespread, with several well-known names having plans approved. However, despite being available since summer 2020, Scottish restructuring plans remain remarkably rare.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Scotland, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morton Fraser MacRoberts LLP, Dobbies Garden Centres, Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020
    Authors:
    Nicola Ross
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Morton Fraser MacRoberts LLP
    Statutory demands in the digital age: can email be effective service?
    2026-04-20

    A statutory demand is a formal notice under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) requiring a company to pay a debt or provide security within a prescribed timeframe. Ignoring it can have serious consequences, including insolvency proceedings. In an era of digital communication, can a statutory demand be validly served by email?

    What does the law say?

    Filed under:
    Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, KHQ Lawyers, Australian Taxation Office, Australia Post, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Kathryn Lechner , Nahum Ayliffe
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    KHQ Lawyers
    New Jersey bankruptcy court upholds debtor-chosen venue under Asset Based Approach
    1969-12-31
    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
    Authors:
    Megan M. Wasson , Rebecca Polinsky
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
    Solvency confirmations and transactions at undervalue: key considerations for companies and lenders in respect of connected party transactions
    2026-04-20

    Connected party transactions - transactions entered into between a company and persons or entities with a close relationship to it (such as directors, shareholders or group companies) - attract heightened scrutiny under the Insolvency Act 1986 (the Act). This is because connected parties are not independent of the transferring company and are often in a position to influence its decision‑making, giving rise to an increased risk that assets are transferred on non‑arm’s‑length terms.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stevens & Bolton LLP
    Authors:
    Matthew Padian , Lucy Trott , Millie Wakefield
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Stevens & Bolton LLP
    The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026
    2026-04-10

    1. INTRODUCTION

    The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 (the "AmendmentAct"), represents the most sweeping reform of India's insolvency regime since the enactment of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the "Principal Code"). 

    Filed under:
    India, Competition & Antitrust, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS INDUSLAW, Competition Commission of India, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, Axis Bank, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of the United States, Financial services corporate
    Authors:
    Abhimanyu Kampani , Mayank Mishra
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    CMS INDUSLAW
    Homebuyers under the Code: Judicial Calibration Between Protection and Process
    <br>
    1969-12-31
    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Workplace harassment, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India)
    Firm:
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Current page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days