The English High Court has again been called upon to consider the validity and legal impact of dealings conducted via WhatsApp.

Background

The Court of Appeal has handed down its judgment in DG Resources Ltd v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, a decision that clarifies how winding‑up petitions must be served, an issue with implications for the 30,000 UK businesses using the Companies House default address for receiving official mail.

Background

DG Resources Ltd owed HMRC £1.104 million.

On 11 December 2024 HMRC presented DG Resources with a winding-up petition.

The petition came before Chief ICC Judge Briggs, who made several key findings:

The Supreme Court of New South Wales has provided guidance as to the meaning of “true employer” for the purposes of the external administration provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act) in In the matter of Mosaic Brands Limited (administrators appointed) (receivers and managers appointed) [2025] NSWSC 959. The decision is important for liquidators and receivers of large corporate group where there are individual trading and employing entities and funds have been recovered from circulating assets.

Here’s a judicial estoppel hypothetical:

• debtor files Subchapter V bankruptcy and achieves a confirmed plan;
• in the bankruptcy debtor fails to disclose a pre-petition lawsuit claim;
• after plan confirmation, debtor files suit on the pre-petition lawsuit claim; and
• defendant seeks dismissal of the lawsuit, with prejudice, on grounds of judicial estoppel—i.e., for debtor/plaintiff’s failure to disclose the claim in bankruptcy.

Question: Who should be the ultimate beneficiary of a lawsuit claim that debtor fails to disclose:

On January 26, 2026, the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta (ABKB) held that the Alberta Department of Energy and Minerals (Alberta Energy) is required to first advance its claim for royalty arrears owed by an insolvent energy company within ongoing restructuring proceedings of that insolvent company, before seeking recovery from jointly liable solvent co-lessees.

Rules of Territorial Jurisdiction in Insolvency Lawsuits: A Reading of Dubai Court of Cassation Rulings

Insolvency cases raise fundamental questions regarding the geographical scope of litigation, especially given the economic integration between the Emirates. One of the most prominent questions is: Can a debtor file an insolvency lawsuit before Dubai Courts while residing in another Emirate?

Between the Hammer of Debt and the Anvil of the Law: Dubai Courts Uphold Compassionate Justice in GCC National’

Highlights

A Petition for Writ of Certiorari has been granted by the U.S. Supreme Court in Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc., Case No. 25-6, on a ruling from the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.[Fn. 1]

The Question Presented in Kethley v. Buddy Ayers is this:

In autumn of 2025, the English High Court decided that liquidators have unlimited personal exposure: they cannot contractually limit or exclude their personal liability for breach of duty. An application for permission to appeal that decision is now before the Court of Appeal.