Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Crypto Bankruptcy Claw-Backs: Strategic Imperatives for Creditors
    2025-12-04

    Written by- Thomas H. Curran, Thomas H. Curran Associates

    Filed under:
    Global, USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, IR Global, Blockchain, Banks
    Location:
    Global, USA
    Firm:
    IR Global
    Re:Petrofac Ltd - Jersey Company granted administration order by English Courts
    <br>
    2025-12-01

    In Re Petrofac Ltd [2025] EWHC 2887 (Ch), the English High Court made an administration order in relation to a Jersey-incorporated company even though its registered office was not in England which is the starting point for determining COMI and therefore the Court’s jurisdiction to make such an order.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Articles of association, Office of Foreign Assets Control (USA)
    Authors:
    Sabina Khan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shareholders Cannot Trigger Insolvency Proceedings: Supreme Court
    <br>
    2025-12-18

    Summary: In EPC Constructions India Ltd. v. Matix Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd., the Supreme Court addressed whether holders of non-cumulative redeemable preference shares can initiate insolvency proceedings under Section 7 of the IBC, as financial creditors. The Court held that preference shareholders are not creditors and cannot trigger insolvency proceedings, as preference shares remain part of the share capital even upon maturity, and conversion of debt into preference shares permanently extinguishes the original creditor relationship.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Insolvency, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Vikash Kumar Jha , Namrata Sadhnani , Shriyadita Srivastava
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
    Business Rates Liability for Receivers: Practical Guidance on Risk Management
    2025-12-12

    Usually, a Fixed Charge Receiver will not be liable to pay business rates. However, there are some exceptions and in some important areas the law is unclear.

    Occupied Property: Limited Exposure

    To be liable for business rates a party must be in occupation of the Property. This is a matter of fact and degree. Generally, the position is clear although there can be issues for example where more than one party is entitled to occupation.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Burges Salmon LLP, Due diligence
    Authors:
    Christopher Bartlett , Nick Middleton
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Burges Salmon LLP
    Putting plans into action
    1969-12-31
    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells, Office of Foreign Assets Control (USA), Poundland, Thames Water, River Island, Petrofac, Estates Gazette, Companies Act 2006 (UK), Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020
    Authors:
    Mathew Ditchburn
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    SDNY reverses confirmation order and strikes opt-out third-party releases in Gol Linhas Aéreas bankruptcy case
    1969-12-31
    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells, Avianca, Purdue Pharma, Avianca Holdings, Transport
    Authors:
    David P Simonds
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Crowd Funded Companies: Court guidance on compulsory share transfers in external administration
    2025-12-01

    Key Takeaways

    Filed under:
    Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ironbridge Legal
    Authors:
    Blake Shaw
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Ironbridge Legal
    Energy: Injunctions to mitigate insolvency risk
    2025-12-18

    In Nordic Power Partners P/S & Ors v Rio Alto Energia, Empreendimentos E Participacoes LTDA & Ors [2025] EWHC 2875 (Comm), the Commercial Court reconfirmed its willingness to grant interim relief to an energy investor in the context of international projects (here related to Brazil). Specifically, this decision provides an interesting insight into steps that can be taken to prevent funds being received by a party that may soon become insolvent (which risks creditors being left without a satisfactory remedy once a dispute is resolved).

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS
    Authors:
    Phillip S. Ashley , Sofia Sotgia , Ted Rhodes , Emma Riddle
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    CMS
    Distressed Debt Legal Insights TPI Composites’ Uptier Litigation
    2025-12-11

    In this issue, we spotlight the unfolding litigation between the UCC and Oaktree in TPI Composites’ ongoing bankruptcy, which appears to be headed for a settlement. This case is unusual in that the uptier transformed former equity holders into senior creditors rather than elevating existing lenders.

    The Unsecured Creditors Committee Challenge

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ropes & Gray LLP, Mediation
    Authors:
    Leonard Klingbaum , Nitin Konchady , Matthew M. Roose , Alisha Turak
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    When might an interim charging order becomes final following an intervening insolvency (UK)
    <br>
    2025-12-08

    On insolvency, the pari passu principle applies, meaning unsecured creditors rank equally in the distribution of available assets. That principle helps explain why a creditor who has obtained a judgment debt but has not completed enforcement (for instance by obtaining a final charging order) will usually be barred from doing so once insolvency intervenes.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Current page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days