Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    The US-Israel legal review 2022
    2023-03-20

    A GLOBAL LEGAL MEDIA & NISHLIS LEGAL MARKETING PUBLICATION THE US-ISRAEL LEGAL REVIEW 2022 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: Israel’s Unicorn Success Story SNNOVATION The US-Israel Legal Review 2022 1 Contents THE US-ISRAEL LEGAL REVIEW 2022 2 WELCOME FROM THE PUBLISHERS Global Legal Media and Nishlis Legal Marketing 4 ECONOMIC HEADWINDS, A HOT WAR AND A TRADE WAR: THE IMPACT ON ISRAEL’S COMPANIES With rising interest rates, rising inflation and reduced growth forecasts, how has that reality been faced by corporate clients and start-ups? Arnon, Tadmor-Levy provide some answers.

    Filed under:
    Global, Israel, USA, New York, Arbitration & ADR, Banking, Capital Markets, Company & Commercial, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Patents, Tax, Trade & Customs, Foreign direct investment, Corporate governance, Blockchain, Private equity, Patent infringement, Big data, Venture capital, Mediation, Fintech, Due diligence, Artificial intelligence, Cryptocurrency, SIPP, ESG, Personal data, Gaming, Cybersecurity, SPAC, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 1996 (USA), GDPR, Federal Arbitration Act 1926 (USA), California Consumer Privacy Act 2018 (USA), US Securities and Exchange Commission, NASDAQ, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, ChatGPT, Silicon Valley Bank
    Location:
    Global, Israel, USA
    U.S. Court Authorizes Service of Subpoena on U.S. Nationals through Social Media While Prohibiting the Issuance of a Subpoena on Foreign Nationals Abroad
    2023-03-20

    Corrupt managerial behavior has been a driver in the collapse of the cryptocurrency market. Enforcing and defending claims against directors and officers, where the directors and officers are not living in the United States and may not be U.S. citizens, is a current judicial focus in the U.S. litigation system. In the Three Arrows Capital (“Three Arrows”) chapter 15 case, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Internet & Social Media, Litigation, Cryptocurrency
    Location:
    USA
    Sell-Side Directors May Be Liable for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims for Failing to Investigate Company's Post-Closing Solvency
    2020-12-28

    In In re Nine West LBO Securities Litigation (Case No. 20-2941) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2020), a federal district court denied in part a motion to dismiss claims brought by the Nine West liquidating trustee against former directors (the "Defendants") of The Jones Group, Inc. (the "Company"), Nine West's predecessor, for, among other things, (i) breaches of their fiduciary duties of care and loyalty, and (ii) aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duties. The litigation arises from the 2014 LBO of the Company by a private equity sponsor ("Buyer").

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Private equity, Due diligence
    Authors:
    Dominick DeChiara , Bryan C. Goldstein , Carey D. Schreiber , Bradley C. Vaiana
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Directors' Duties Under English Law — How to Lead in Difficult Times
    2022-07-01

    Elon Musk recently said he has a "super bad feeling" about the economy, pithily declaring what most financial commentators have been predicting in more technical terms.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Coronavirus, UK Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Sonya Van de Graaff , Prav Reddy
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Nondischargeable Debt in Favor of Victims of Fraud
    2023-02-27

    In Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, the Supreme Court of the United States resolved confusion in the lower courts over the scope and application of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), which prohibits debtors from discharging debt through bankruptcy when such debt was obtained as a result of fraudulent actions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Duane Morris LLP, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Lawrence J. Kotler , Drew S. McGehrin
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Duane Morris LLP
    Bankruptcy Court Rejects US Trustee Fees on Distributions From Trust in 'Paragon Offshore'
    2021-09-08

    In the recent decision of Paragon Offshore, No. 16-10386 (CSS), 2021 (Bankr. D. Del. June 28, 2021), the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the court) addressed the issue of whether the Office of the United States Trustee (OUST) could collect its quarterly fees against assets that were previously transferred to a litigation trust (the litigation trust) free and clear of any and all claims, liens and other encumbrances pursuant to a confirmed plan of liquidation.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Duane Morris LLP, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Lawrence J. Kotler
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Duane Morris LLP
    L’élargissement des pouvoirs d'enquête d'un contrôleur en vertu de la Lacc
    2021-10-08

    Dans le cadre de l’affaire Bloom Lake relative à la Loi sur les arrangements avec les créanciers des compagnies (la « Lacc »), la Cour supérieure du Québec prononce un jugement au sujet de l'élargissement des pouvoirs du contrôleur dans un contexte où un créancier refusait de produire la documentation demandée par les débitrices.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Authors:
    Gabriel Faure , Janie L.-Roy
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Horton v Henry [2014] – pensions and bankruptcy – appeal allowed
    2015-02-19

    Of general interest is the appeal in the case of Horton v Henry, on which we reported in our January 2015 update. In Horton, the High Court declined to follow a previous ruling, and decided that a bankrupt could not be compelled to access his pension savings to pay off creditors.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025
    2021-12-21

    In the case of Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (No 3); Bank of Communications Co Ltd v Sparkes (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1025 (Anchorage v Sparkes), the Supreme Court of NSW considered the obligations of company officers to sophisticated commercial lending entities, and whether company officers could be personally liable for making misleading statements.

    Significance

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP
    Authors:
    Jacques Jacobs
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 2537
    • Page 2538
    • Page 2539
    • Page 2540
    • Current page 2541
    • Page 2542
    • Page 2543
    • Page 2544
    • Page 2545
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days