Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    The not so artful dodger: art dealer ordered to draw maximum pension sums to pay creditors
    2023-03-03

    Summary

    In the recent Court of Appeal decision Bacci v Green [2022] EWCA Civ 1393 the Court, upholding the decision of the High Court, held that a judgment debtor can be ordered to delegate authority to waive valuable tax protection and draw pension where doing so would enable creditors to extract what they were owed.

    The Facts

    In 2017, Matthew Green, son of established Mayfair art dealer Richard Green, committed fraud in obtaining loans from FundingSecure.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Burges Salmon LLP
    Authors:
    Justin Briggs
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Burges Salmon LLP
    Pooling order for the win!
    2023-03-03

    On 2 March 2023 the Supreme Court of Victoria published its reasons in the matter of Atlas Gaming Holdings Pty Ltd [2023] VSC 91 (the Atlas case) in which Gadens acted on behalf of the Liquidator of four companies seeking a pooling order pursuant to section 579E of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act). There have been very few judgments on section 579E which was introduced in 2007 by the Corporations Amendment (Insolvency) Act 2007 (Cth) Sch 1 items 133ff and operative from 31 December 2007.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Gadens, Gaming, Insolvency, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Robert Hinton , Louise Schmid
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Gadens
    Proposed Amendments to the IBC: Positive Changes on the Horizon
    2023-03-03

    This is the second in a two-part series article providing suggestions with respect to the recent discussion paper published by the MCA on 18 January 2023, proposing several major amendments to the IBC Code, 2016.

    MCA’s recent discussion paper has proposed significant amendments to address several nagging issues in the working of the IBC. In the first part of this series, we highlighted some proposals that required a closer look. This piece discusses positive suggestions that could substantially improve the insolvency regime and enhance its efficiency.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trilegal, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Ashish Bhan , Lisa Mishra
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Trilegal
    Re Sova Capital Ltd [2023] EWHC 452 (Ch) Sale of Assets, Sanctions
    2023-03-03

    Miles J’s judgment in Re Sova Capital Ltd [2023] EWHC 452 (Ch) will, like that of Jonathan Hilliard QC in Re Petropavlovsk Plc,be welcomed as a further example of the courts acting to assist insolvency practitioners selling assets in unusual circumstances.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Wedlake Bell, Financial Conduct Authority (UK)
    Authors:
    Frances Coulson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Wedlake Bell
    U.S. Supreme Court Disallows Innocent Partner’s Discharge of Debt From Partner’s Fraud
    2023-03-03

    On February 22, 2023, the United States Supreme Court (“the Supreme Court”) issued its Opinion in the matter of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, No. 21-908, LEXIS 943 (Feb. 22, 2023), holding that per 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), a partnership member is not entitled to discharge a debt incurred by the fraud of another partnership member, regardless of the fact the innocent member had no knowledge of the fraud.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Riker Danzig LLP, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Kori Pruett , Michael R. O’Donnell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Riker Danzig LLP
    Supreme Court decision gives further clarity on claims by distressed companies against directors
    2023-03-01

    Although not directly concerned with directors' liabilities, the recent Supreme Court judgment in Stanford International Bank Ltd v HSBC Bank PLC provides further clarity on the circumstances in which a distressed or insolvent company may seek to make claims against its directors.

    INTRODUCTION

    The key aspects affecting directors' liabilities presented in the Supreme Court ruling are that:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Andrew Cooke , Richard Mendoza
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    青岛中院作出“胜通债”虚假陈述一审判决,全国首例认定损失应为投资差额而非票面本息
    2023-03-01

    山东胜通集团股份有限公司(以下简称“胜通集团”)债券信息披露违法案是证监会2021年证监稽查20起典型违法案例之一,相关中介机构均被行政处罚,备受资本市场关注。日前,青岛市中级人民法院(下称“青岛中院”)对“胜通债”虚假陈述诉讼案作出一审判决。

    本案系北京金融法院“大连机床”判例后债券虚假陈述诉讼领域的又一经典判例,一审判决诸多亮点值得点赞:(1)新《证券法》实施后全国法院首例认定债券虚假陈述造成的债券投资损失应为投资差额损失而非债券票面本息;(2)全国法院首例在债券虚假陈述案件中剔除系统风险和非系统风险所致债券投资损失;(3)充分考察债券价格、交易量变化,突破性地认定发行人“澄清公告”发布日为揭露日;(4)创新性地认定案涉债券市场并非有效市场,应以破产清偿金额来确定债券基准价。

    该案判决对债券虚假陈述投资损失的认定,标志着我国债券虚假陈述损失的司法认定思路已开始理性回归“损害填平”的侵权责任本质。此外,该案判决对债券虚假陈述揭露日和基准价方面的认定,进一步丰富了人民法院审理债券虚假陈述专业性问题的实践,积累了宝贵经验,具有相当的前沿性和示范性。

    Filed under:
    China, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Zhong Lun Law Firm, China Securities Regulatory Commission
    Authors:
    Zhang Baosheng
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Zhong Lun Law Firm
    Guernsey funds legal and regulatory update
    2023-03-01

    An overview of Guernsey legislative and regulatory developments for the period 1 December 2022 to 28 February 2023 inclusive.

    1 Corporate insolvency regime – update

    The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 (Insolvency) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 (the Amendment Ordinance) finally came into force on 1 January 2023.

    Filed under:
    Guernsey, Capital Markets, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Mourant, Anti-money laundering, Confidential information, Suspicious activity reporting, European Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Darren Bacon , Frances Watson , James Cousins , Charlotte Brown , Gary Hall , Alasdair McKenzie , Annaliese McGeoch
    Location:
    Guernsey
    Firm:
    Mourant
    Píldoras Concursales Febrero
    2023-03-01

    Introducción

    Este mes las resoluciones reseñadas son menos y de menor relevancia que el mes pasado. Destacamos en todo caso el auto de homologación de uno de los primeros planes de restructuración aprobados tras la entrada en vigor de la nueva ley 16/2022 con una peculiar formación de clases donde muchas de ellas son clases unipersonales.

    También destacamos un auto del Juzgado de lo Mercantil número 3 de Gijón que niega el embargo preventivo de los bienes de los administradores de la concursada por no apreciarse que vaya a existir un déficit concursal.

    Filed under:
    Spain, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashurst, Bankruptcy, ESG
    Authors:
    Jorge Vazquez , Jose Christian Bertram , José Antonio Rodríguez , José Ramón Casado
    Location:
    Spain
    Firm:
    Ashurst
    Proposed Amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code- A Real Solution For Real Estate Insolvencies?
    2023-03-01

    Over the last few years, several cases of defaulting real estate companies, including major players like, Amrapali, Jaypee Infratech and Supertech, have been stuck at various stages of insolvency proceedings under the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended (“Code”).

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Srideepa Bhattacharyya , Aishwarya Gupta
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 230
    • Page 231
    • Page 232
    • Page 233
    • Current page 234
    • Page 235
    • Page 236
    • Page 237
    • Page 238
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days