23 декабря 2025 года Пленум Верховного Суда РФ принял постановление № 41 "Об установлении в процедурах банкротства требований контролирующих должника лиц и аффилированных лиц должника"[1] (далее – "Постановление").

On 23 December 2025 the Plenary Session of the Russian Supreme Court issued Judgment No. 41 “On Establishing the Claims of the Controlling Persons of a Debtor and the Affiliates of the Debtor during Bankruptcy Proceedings"[1] (hereinafter the "Judgment").

© WongPartnership LLP DISCLAIMER: This update is intended for your general information only. It is not intended to be nor should it be regarded as or relied upon as legal advice. You should consult a qualified legal professional before taking any action or omitting to take action in relation to matters discussed herein. WongPartnership LLP (UEN: T08LL0003B) is a limited liability law partnership registered in Singapore under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2005.

For what comes next tlt.com Disputes Outlook 2026 Insolvency TLT TLT Disputes Outlook 2026 Disputes Outlook 2026 Contents 2 Contents Live issues Expanded claims against directors of insolvent companies 3 Creditor challenges outside of formal insolvency 3 Increased regulation in the private rented sector 4 Emerging trends Insolvency proceedings as a method of debt recovery 5 Contested winding up and bankruptcy petitions 5 Mid-market restructuring plans 6 Spot the risks. Plan ahead. Resolve with confidence. Disputes aren’t always avoidable, but being prepared can make all the difference.

ARBITRATION

Date: 09 December, 2025

Case Name: Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. BCL Secure Premises Pvt. Ltd. Civil Appeal No. 14647 of 2025

Forum: Supreme Court

Mass torts and resulting litigation are a reality of life in these United States.

But one of the truly shocking things about mass tort litigation, in recent times, is this:

• judicial delays override the wishes of mass tort victims for prompt payment of negotiated amounts.

A current example of such delays is the Boy Scouts confirmed bankruptcy plan.

Chronology

Here is a short Chronology of the Boy Scouts bankruptcy plan—and the lapse of more than three years since confirmation without a final resolution:

When a professional corporation operates with equipment owned personally by its director, how do secured creditors assert priority over proceeds from a receivership sale?

The Uniform Law Commission (“ULC”) is the same organization that brought us the Uniform Commercial Code, the Uniform Trust Code, and other “Uniform” state laws.

The ULC is now offering a Uniform Assignment for Benefit of Creditors Act (the “Uniform ABC Act”).

The new Uniform ABC Act codifies the common law of ABCs. Such common law has its foundation in the law of trusts: i.e., debtor is the trustor, assignee is the trustee, and debtor’s creditors are the beneficiaries.

Introduction

Reverse vesting orders (“RVOs”) have evolved from a creative restructuring tool used sparingly under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) into a flexible instrument increasingly considered in receivership and other insolvency proceedings. The past two years have seen Canadian courts (particularly in British Columbia) grapple with whether, and in what circumstances, an RVO can be justified under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”).