Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    To Be or Not to Be (Solvent) - A Comparative Analysis of Singapore, UK, US, and Australia on Recognising Foreign Proceedings under the UNCITRAL Model Law
    2024-04-02

    TO BE OR NOT TO BE (SOLVENT) - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SINGAPORE, UK, US, AND AUSTRALIA ON RECOGNISING FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE UNCITRAL MODEL LAW PIERRE DZAKPASU, ANNE JESUDASON, FLORENCE LI The recent case of Ascentra Holdings, Inc v. SPGK Pte Ltd [2023] SGCA 32 (Ascentra) has drawn a line in the sand in the Singapore court's interpretation of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (UNCITRAL Model Law), as incorporated in the Third Schedule of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (IRDA) to create the Singapore Model Law.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Global, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Cross-border insolvency, UNCITRAL, Singapore High Court
    Location:
    Australia, Global, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    Amendment to Slovenian Insolvency Act impacts duties of company management and supervisory boards
    2024-04-02

    The latest amendment to the Slovenian Insolvency Act (Zakon o finančnem poslovanju, postopkih zaradi insolventnosti in prisilnem prenehanju or ZFPPIPP-H), which entered into force in late 2023, introduced the concept of likely or threatening insolvency and additional duties for the company and its management, which were first described in the article Amendment to the Slovenian Insolvency Act brings additional duties to the management and supervisory bodies, published in CEE Legal Matters (

    Filed under:
    Slovenia, Insolvency & Restructuring, CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Irena Šik Bukovnik , Neža Vončina
    Location:
    Slovenia
    Firm:
    CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz
    Latvia - criminal investigation into helicopter sale discontinued
    2024-04-02

    It is being reported that the Latvian State Security Service (the VDD) has discontinued a criminal investigation started in November 2023 into the sale of a helicopter by a company indirectly co-owned by the designated person Petr Aven .

    Filed under:
    Latvia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trade & Customs, Duane Morris LLP, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Mark Handley
    Location:
    Latvia
    Firm:
    Duane Morris LLP
    NCLAT Clarifies that Flat Allottees can initiate CIRP Against an Assignee or Transferee of a Real Estate Project
    2024-04-01

    The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”) in Anjani Kumar Prashar v. Manab Datta & Ors, Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Khaitan & Co, Insolvency, Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Thriyambak J. Kannan , Aditya Mukerjee , Hareepriya E. Narasimhan
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Khaitan & Co
    Group Insolvency - The Need of the Hour
    2024-04-01

    Against the backdrop of recent judicial precedent, this article delves into the need for a group insolvency framework in India, and analyses the report published by the CBIRC in 2021.

    Globalisation has led to a significant increase in the number of enterprises which comprise of several closely connected entities that may operate as a single economic unit. As a consequence, difficulties may arise when 1 or more entities in that single economic unit become insolvent as the inability of 1 entity to pay its debts may impact stakeholders in another entity within the group.

    Filed under:
    Global, India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bharucha & Partners, Insolvency, UNCITRAL, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Sudeshna Guha Roy , Ayesha Bharucha
    Location:
    Global, India
    Firm:
    Bharucha & Partners
    从一宗大规模清盘案件看香港抵押物及担保的执行
    2024-04-01

    引言

    近期,香港高等法院正式颁布针对一家大型港股公司(“港股公司”)的清盘令并委任清盘人。这宗债项涉及约数十亿美元的清盘呈请终于落下帷幕,也成为香港有史以来涉及金额最大的清盘案件之一。不少客户均希望了解,香港法下这类清盘对债权人利益及权利之影响。我们将持续推出系列文章,为大家介绍有关内容。

    案情简介

    根据香港公司清盘法律规定,公司任何一位债权人、股东或公司本身均可通过向高等法院提交清盘呈请书发起针对该公司的强制清盘。就该案而言,数月前港股公司的一债权人入禀香港高等法院,对港股公司提起清盘呈请(“呈请”)。该清盘呈请提出后,历经多次聆讯及延期申请,香港高等法院最终针对港股公司颁布了清盘令。

    债权人对清盘债务人的行动

    一旦公司进入强制清盘程序,根据香港公司清盘法律规定,所有针对该公司的诉讼程序均会自动中止。该规定目的在于确保清盘程序的有序进行,公司资产不会被用于提起或辩护任何法律程序,以保护公司财产和债权人利益。

    Filed under:
    China, Hong Kong, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Zhong Lun Law Firm
    Authors:
    Alan Xu , Carmen Cheng
    Location:
    China, Hong Kong
    Firm:
    Zhong Lun Law Firm
    The continued development of contentious restructurings as litigation
    2024-04-02

    Following a series of important decisions in England and across Europe, it is now beyond doubt that court-based restructuring processes should be approached from the outset as pieces of litigation.

    We have seen increasingly sophisticated challenges to restructurings, which the courts are willing to accommodate. In appropriate cases, the courts have also refused to sanction restructurings.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, HM Revenue and Customs (UK)
    Authors:
    Craig Montgomery , Katharina Crinson , Frank Clarke , Harry White , Xuan Boh
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    Enforcement Case of the Month -- Tailwinds for Judgment Creditors: Reverse Veil Piercing Continues to Gain Steam in New York
    2024-04-02

    Judgment and award creditors often fret that US courts are unfriendly and the tools to unravel complicated asset protection schemes are inadequate. In an encouraging ruling refuting this sentiment, the Southern District of New York recently reiterated its endorsement for reverse veil piercing as a remedy for unsatisfied judgment creditors seeking to hold corporate entities responsible for judgment liabilities of shareholders and directors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Omni Bridgeway
    Authors:
    Gabe Bluestone
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Omni Bridgeway
    UAE: New Insolvency Law explained
    2024-04-02

    In brief

    The UAE has issued Federal Law No. 48 of 2023 in relation to insolvency (the "New Insolvency Law"), which replaces Federal Law No. 9 of 2016 and comes into effect on 1 May 2024. Although the previous law was more progressive compared to the previous insolvency articles embedded in the old Commercial Code of 1993, at least in relation to the numerous insolvency matters and other protective composition and restructuring witnessed by the courts.

    We have set out below some of the key characteristics of the New Insolvency Law:

    Filed under:
    United Arab Emirates, Insolvency & Restructuring, Baker McKenzie, Articles of association, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Mazen Boustany , Chaya Gupta
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    The issue of the concurrency of attorney´s fees in bankruptcy: concurrent or non-concurrent credit
    2024-04-02

    Introduction

    In bankruptcy, attorney´s fees are a fundamental element of the process when establishing the correct compensation for those professionals representing the interests of the parties involved. This matter sometimes sparks intense debates in the legal field, particularly regarding the classification of these credits as concurrent or non-concurrent. In this regard, especially when constituted after the declaration of bankruptcy, the matter of the concurrent vs. non-concurrent nature of attorney´s fees had different perspectives over the years.

    Filed under:
    Brazil, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Leite Tosto e Barros Advogados
    Authors:
    Paulo Guilherme De Mendonça Lopes , Alexandre Paranhos Tacla Abbruzzini
    Location:
    Brazil
    Firm:
    Leite Tosto e Barros Advogados

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 70
    • Page 71
    • Page 72
    • Page 73
    • Current page 74
    • Page 75
    • Page 76
    • Page 77
    • Page 78
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days