British universities facing financial challenges and shifting enrollment patterns are considering restructuring plans in light of potential insolvencies.

※    本ニューズレターは、2024 年 8 月 19 日現在の情報に基づいています。

2024 年 8 月 9 日に、The Supreme Court of the Union（ミャンマーの最高裁判所）から、insolvency practitioner（「倒産実務家」）の登録フォーム及び費用に関する告示（Notification  No.998/2024、「本倒産告示」）が公布されました。また、同日、National Committee for Setting Minimum Wage（国家委員会）から、最低賃金の実質的な引き上げに関する告示（Notification No.1/2024、「本賃金告示」）が交付されましたので、その概要をお伝えします。

1. 倒産実務家の登録フォーム及び費用に関する告示

2020    年に施行された倒産法上、会社の清算手続は清算人により遂行される必要がありますが、かかる清算人は、倒産法に従って登録され、所定の資格を有する倒産実務家である必要があるとされていましたが、倒産実務家の具体的選任は進んでおりませんでした。

Four U.S. Supreme Court justices (Kagan, Kavanaugh, Roberts and Sotomayor) provide the following summary of their Purdue Pharmadissent in the Purdue Pharma case.

Wrong & Devastating

Today’s five-justice majority opinion is wrong on the law and devastating for more than 100,000 opioid victims and their families:

With many airlines having weathered the storm of the Covid-19 pandemic, one common theme with airline restructurings has been a clear reliance on the United States’ Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings – particularly over their domestic jurisdictions or other viable jurisdictions (such as a UK scheme of arrangement or UK restructuring plan). But when seeking to restructure, why have many airlines tended towards Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings as an internationally recognised restructuring procedure and shied away from the UK schemes?

Preparing a business for an exit can be a complex and time-consuming task.

After years of hard-fought litigation, most claimants are thrilled to obtain a final and enforceable judgment or arbitration award. However, more often than one thinks, this excitement is followed by the disappointing realization that the defendant has little interest in voluntarily satisfying the award.

The recent High Court decisions in Boughey & Anor v Toogood International Transport and Agricultural Services Ltd and Re Pindar Scarborough Ltd (in administration) have helpfully provided clarity on the extent to which secured creditors that have been paid in full are required to consent to proposed administration extensions. Unhelpfully, however, the court’s approach is fundamentally at odds with the position of the Insolvency Service.

This year was set up for disappointment in restructuring activity, given high levels of Chapter 11 filings and debt defaults in 2023 — especially in 1H23 — as well as the resurgence of leverage credit issuance since late 2023 that has allowed many distressed companies to address near-term debt maturities or liquidity challenges without a formal restructuring event. Restructuring activity in 2024 is almost certain to come up short of last year’s high bar; the only question is by how much.

Bij onroerende goederen, kan de situatie ontstaan dat tijdens de bouw een hypotheekrecht wordt gevestigd ten behoeve van de bank. Als de opdrachtgever failliet gaat, en de aannemer oefent het retentierecht uit, wie mag dan het onroerend goed verkopen? De Hoge Raad heeft hier onlangs uitgebreid antwoord op gegeven.

In an announcement to beneficiaries on 24 March 2024[1], the joint administrative receivers (JARs) of Sigma Finance Corporation (the Company), once thought to be “insolvency proof”