Written by - Thomas H. Curran
As cross-border insolvencies continue to evolve, a notable shift is emerging in how complex restructurings are being executed. While Chapter 11 has long been the dominant forum for large corporate reorganizations, an increasing number of companies - particularly those with international capital structures - are turning to foreign restructuring regimes as a primary venue, with Chapter 15 serving as the mechanism to extend those proceedings into the United States.
In my earlier piece for Business Day and TimesLIVE (read here) last year, I argued that South Africa’s insolvency framework, from the enduring Insolvency Act of 1936 to the Companies Act’s business rescue provisions and the Cross-Border Insolvency Act of 2000, gives us genuine reason for pride.
The La Perla case represents one of the first real tests of cross-border insolvency between Italy and the United Kingdom in the post-Brexit landscape. The well-known lingerie brand, founded in Bologna in 1954, became embroiled in a complex corporate crisis that culminated in November 2023 with the opening of compulsory liquidation proceedings before the High Court in London against La Perla Global Management (UK) Limited (LPGMUK).
Welcome to the latest edition of the Financial Regulation Weekly Bulletin.
If you would like to discuss in more detail, please contact your relationship partner or email one of our Financial Regulation team.
Developments this week are in relation to:
|
INTRODUCTION:
In Re King & Wood Mallesons and other matters [2025] SGHC 67, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore (High Court) granted recognition and reliefs under the UNCITRAL Model Law on CrossBorder Insolvency (Model Law) in respect of a consolidated reorganisation of three Chinese companies in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). This decision provides guidance to insolvency office-holders appointed under PRC law on the procedural requirements to seek recognition under the Model Law in Singapore.