Background
German insolvency law prohibits managing directors from making payments on behalf of the company after it has become illiquid or over-indebted. This does not apply to payments made when acting with the due care and diligence of a prudent business manager. Such payments are privileged as they do not reduce the insolvency estate and do not disadvantage creditors if they allow the business to continue and enable corporate recovery.
Decision
German gaming group Löwen Play obtained sanction for a scheme of arrangement following a hearing in the High Court on 5 May 2022. Mr Justice Johnson granted an order sanctioning the scheme following its approval by a significant majority of creditors at the single scheme meeting. The group operates a gaming arcade business in Germany and the Netherlands, and the relevant scheme company was incorporated in Germany.
Debtors and investors have an enhanced choice of restructuring venues as the EU Restructuring Directive is rolled out in Member States
Wirecard's insolvency administrator has won a first victory before the Munich I Regional Court. On 5 May, the court declared the annual financial statements for 2017 and 2018, which show balance sheet profits totalling around EUR 600 million, null and void. Dividends of around EUR 47 million were distributed to Wirecard's shareholders from these profits, which probably never existed. As a consequence of the nullity of the annual accounts, the resolutions on the utilisation of the balance sheet profits are also null and void.
Update unseres Leitfadens zum Umgang mit Materialkostenerhöhungen und Lieferverzögerungen
Die aktuelle Entwicklung bei Baukosten und Materiallieferungen
Background
Under German insolvency law, employees are generally protected from claw-back claims. The payment of wages is considered a "cash transaction" if the employer pays the salary within three months of the work being performed. A “cash transaction” can only be contested in limited circumstances. Where a third party pays the salary, the cash transaction privilege remains if it is not clear to the employee that a third party made the payment (s.142(2) and s.3 InsO).
A recent German Federal Court of Justice ruling shows that this protection has limits.
The situation, which is already unpleasant in itself for a shareholder of a bankrupt company, becomes really annoying in many cases due to the insolvency administrator's right to challenge insolvency under sections 129 et spp. InsO, the situation becomes really annoying in many cases. It is particularly annoying if the shareholder has provided security for the claim of a company creditor for the repayment of a loan and is claimed by the insolvency administrator under sections 143 (3) and 135 InsO (shareholder loan) despite the fact that the company has already repaid the loan.
Under German insolvency law, a company is over-indebted when its existing assets do not fully cover its debts and there is no positive going concern prognosis. A positive going concern prognosis is assumed if the company has sufficient liquid funds available for a certain period to satisfy all liabilities at maturity and its profitability will be restored in accordance with a business plan.
Recent court decisions and legislative clarification
Over-indebtedness remains a ground for insolvency
Im Browser ansehen Im Browser ansehen
Februar 2022
Februar 2022
NFFeebbrruueaarrw22002222sletteNr eRwuslselattnedr Russland tteINNrneesRowwulvsssellsneezlattattnneefIderrncshRRotuuulvnssegssn:zllRaaaennncfddehctshpturencgh:uRnegcshtbsperseicchhutngsbe
0a2n1fI2I22ennc000ssh111oot999ullvvneegnn222:zz000Raa222enn111cff2eehcc0tshh1ptt9uurenncgg2h::0uRR2nee1gccshhttbsspperrrseeiccchhhuutnnggssbbeerrssiicchhtt
Englische Version Russische Version
Englische Version
Russische Version Englische Version REunsgsliisscchhee VVeerrssiioonn Russische Version
View in browser View in browser
February 2022
February 2022