The Government has announced proposals for retrospective changes for the urgent reforms to UK insolvency law, designed to protect companies and their directors during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Wrongful trading

These changes will include a temporary suspension (to the end of June 2020) of section 214 Insolvency Act 1986 in relation to wrongful trading, subject to passage of the upcoming Corporate Insolvency & Governance Bill through Parliament in the coming weeks.

In recent decisions involving accessories retailer Colette Group and Virgin airlines, the Federal Court of Australia found that the extraordinary circumstances of COVID-19 warrant a grant of relief for the administrators from personal liability for rent.

In both cases, the Court acknowledged the uncertainty caused by COVID-19 and found that the rent reprieve for the administrators was in the best interests of the creditors as a whole.

colette group

The number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has risen rapidly, prompting local authorities to put in place stricter containment measures, including a full lockdown which commenced on 4 April 2020. Outside of businesses in vital sectors, all other businesses were directed to apply a work from home policy or to close down.

Directors of Hong Kong companies operate in an environment of personal liability – a liability that is brought into sharp focus where companies face financial difficulties or even insolvency. This liability may take not only the form of criminal or civil liability but also the form of a director disqualification order, meaning an order to bar that director from being involved in the management of a company in the future.

The surprising emergence of COVID-19 in 2020 has caught many companies by a complete surprise. Boards of directors of companies, of every size and from each industry, who have just recently approved their budget for 2020, have fallen into a new reality – suspension and, occasionally, complete stop, of business activity. The economic effect of the deadly virus is yet to be fully realized, however it is safe to assume that many companies and business entities who suffer liquidity issues during the crisis, may face insolvency or quasi-insolvency proceedings.

Shareholders in FTSE 250 company TI Fluid Systems yesterday voted down the company’s proposal to pay a £27 million dividend. In a highly unusual move, 57 per cent of shareholders in the motor part manufacturer used their votes to block the dividend payment which had been recommended by the board just four days earlier. It followed critical media coverage of the proposal, which centred on the fact that the company was making the payment while furloughing staff and cutting workers’ pay and would have resulted in a payment of almost £15 million to US private equity firm Bain Capital.

Times are changing rapidly with the current flow of Coronavirus measures introduced to support businesses in debt and distress.

We take a look at what creditors can (and can’t) do to help better protect their position.

I’m owed money. What can I do?

Certain recent government measures may impede your ability to take recovery or enforcement action at the present time. The good news is that many avenues remain available.

You cannot (in some cases):

Over the past few weeks, the UK government, regulators and other bodies have moved to help businesses navigate the unprecedented disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We start this briefing with a round-up of key changes in the areas of company law and corporate finance regulation.

Filing accounts

What is a debt-restructuring moratorium?

Since 20 April 2020, both the judicial and debt collection pauses have ended. The legal standstill decreed by the Swiss Federal Council in accordance with Art. 62 of the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Act (DEBA) has thus expired. For a business that, despite the emergency aid provided by the Swiss government and the cantons, is still unable to meet its obligations (immediately) but wishes to continue its business activities, the question arises as to how it can obtain creditor protection.

Myanmar’s legal system is governed by both old and new laws and regulations, as well as internal policies and practices of the Myanmar authorities. Many laws dating back to the colonial period and post-independence period are, with certain changes, still in force. Since its political and economic opening in 2011, Myanmar has embarked on a comprehensive reform process and is currently overhauling its legal framework. Existing laws were revised or replaced, and new laws enacted.

Considerations for Distressed Transactions