Recently, the Supreme Court in the decision of Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Anr1 (“Arun KumarDecision”) examined the interplay between liquidation proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) and Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”). The issue before the Supreme Court was to decide whether a person ineligible to submit resolution plan under Section 29A of the IBC is barred from proposing a scheme under Section 230 of the Act.
In addition to the extension to the commercial eviction ban until 30 June 2021, the UK Government has now also extended the moratorium on commencing winding-up proceedings until 30 June 2021.
You may view the regulation from the UK Government at gov.uk.
Asenior employee of a company no matter how malfeasant, fraudulent, dishonest, incompetent, or inept they have proved themselves to be in the performance of their role cannot be disqualified under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 unless they were one of the company's directors or shadow directors.
In the world of companies, therefore, disqualification for unfitness following insolvency is the sole preserve of directors and those in accordance with whose direction or instruction the directors are accustomed to act.
Amplifying JCAM Commercial Real Estate Property XV Ltd v Davis Haulage Ltd [2018] EWCA CIV 276 the court has again considered repeated Notices of Intention to Appoint (NOITA) and the effect on the interim moratorium.
Background
This case involved the Company filing 4 successive NOITAs although only two of them were the subject of these proceedings (NOITA 1 and NOITA 2).
The Company owned a Property which was subject to a legal mortgage and QFC. The secured loan was in default and the Company was seeking to delay enforcement whilst it refinanced.
The Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (“SBRA”) took effect in February 2020. The SBRA gives small businesses new forms of bankruptcy relief that were not previously available to them under federal law, including the ability for business owners to retain ownership of their businesses without first paying their creditors in full.
Unlike the GFC, which was essentially a liquidity crisis, Australia is likely to face a gradual increase in business insolvencies, rather than the feared ‘insolvency cliff’, as the Federal Government’s COVID-19 stimulus measures are wound down at the end of March.
The Australian government has taken swift action to enact new legislation that significantly changes the insolvency laws relevant to all business as a result of the ongoing developments related to COVID-19.
On 24 February 2021, the government published new draft Administration (Restrictions on Disposal etc. to Connected Persons) Regulations 2021 (the Regulations), following the consultation process conducted in late 2020. The Regulations are still to be debated by Parliament, but are expected to come into effect on 30 April 2021 with few substantive amendments.
According to the Guinness Book of Records, one Mr Johnson George of India holds the world record for the most roles played by any actor in one film. He played 45 roles, including Gandhi, Leonardo Da Vinci and Jesus. Company directors don’t have quite as many roles, nor are they as lofty.
What happens to a company’s intellectual property rights when the company is dissolved?
Sometimes not all loose ends are tied up neatly and companies are dissolved whilst still owning assets. What happens to those assets if they are not bought prior to dissolution can appear mysterious, but even following the dissolution of the company the assets may continue to exist. In this article we discuss the processes that can be used in England and Wales to obtain intellectual property assets from dissolved companies.
Falling into “bona vacantia”