Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    7th Cir. Upholds Rejection of Borrower’s FCRA and FDCPA Claims Arising from Collection and Reporting Post-Bankruptcy
    2024-07-15

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently upheld a trial court’s rejection of a borrower’s allegations that a mortgagee and its servicer violated the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by allegedly inaccurately reporting her loan as delinquent following the borrower’s successful completion of her bankruptcy plan, allegedly rejecting her subsequent monthly payments, and filing a foreclosure action based on the supposed post-bankruptcy defaults.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Bankruptcy, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1977 (USA), Seventh Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals
    Authors:
    Ralph T. Wutscher
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    Hellard v OJSC Rossiysky Kredit Bank
    2024-07-15

    The judgment of Nicholas Thompsell, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, in Hellard & Ors v OJSC Rossiysky Kredit Bank & Ors [2024] EWHC 1783 (Ch) deals with three questions raised by an application of the trustees in bankruptcy of Anatoly Leonidovich Motylev for directions under s 303(2) Insolvency Act 1986:

    (1) Should the trustees treat certain Russian bank creditors as being caught by the sanctions imposed under the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019?

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Trade & Customs, Wedlake Bell, HM Revenue and Customs (UK), Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (UK)
    Authors:
    Frances Coulson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Wedlake Bell
    The UKJT Legal Statement On Digital Assets And English Insolvency Law: Implications For Cayman Islands Insolvency Practitioners
    2024-07-23

    The UK Jurisdiction Taskforce has published a comprehensive Legal Statement on Digital Assets and English Insolvency Law.

    In this article we review the key aspects relevant to Cayman Islands Insolvency Practitioners.

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    Cayman Islands, United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Appleby, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Alan Bercow , Charlotte Walker , Ross Mcleod
    Location:
    Cayman Islands, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Appleby
    How to improve your contractual rights to be paid
    2024-07-26

    The economic picture has started to improve, with modest GDP growth in the first half of 2024. However, the enormous strains on business finances over the past four years have caused insolvency rates to rise sharply this year.

    According to The Insolvency Service’s latest figures, company insolvencies in June 2024 were the third highest since monthly records started in 2020. Administrations in June 2024 were 22% higher than in June 2023, and the number of CVAs was 64% higher in June 2024 than June 2023.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Keystone Law, Supply chain, Due diligence, Coronavirus, Insolvency, Insolvency Service (UK), Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020, Banks
    Authors:
    Lucy Pringle
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Keystone Law
    Balancing act for ARCs when using resolution tools
    2024-06-20

    Under the framework of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI), an asset reconstruction company (ARC) has wide powers to revive a company facing financial difficulties. It can use securitisation, reconstruction and recovery for quick resolution of distressed debt. As an alternative, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), allows ARCs with access to a formal resolution process, which has the advantage of the borrower emerging debt-free with a clean slate.

    Filed under:
    India, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 (India), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Veena Sivaramakrishnan
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
    High Court finds borrower's security confers floating charge, despite intention of parties to create fixed charge and lender's contractual power to exercise control
    2024-06-20

    The High Court has found that a borrower's debenture granted to a lender in respect of certain internet protocol (IP) addresses was a floating charge.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Authors:
    John Corrie , John Chetwood , Rachael MacKay , Ceri Morgan , Nihar Lovell
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Insolvenzanfechtungsrecht nach dem StaRUG
    2024-06-21

    Die §§ 89 – 91 StaRUG: Eigenständiger Regelungsinhalt oder lediglich klarstellender Charakter? Wir klären auf!

    Die EU-Richtlinie über Restrukturierung und Insolvenz (Restrukturierungsrichtlinie) enthält in Kapitel 4 (Art. 17, 18) besondere Vorschriften zur Insolvenzanfechtung. Diese hat der deutsche Gesetzgeber mit den §§ 89 – 91 StaRUG in nationales Recht umgesetzt. Daher lohnt sich ein vertiefter Blick auf diese Vorschriften.

    Richtliniengeber möchte Finanzierungen und Zwischenfinanzierungen schützen

    Filed under:
    European Union, Germany, Banking, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Germany
    Authors:
    Niklas Lütcke , Philipp Freiherr von dem Bussche-Haddenhausen
    Location:
    European Union, Germany
    Firm:
    CMS Germany
    Candidates for Non-Traditional Securitizations
    2024-06-26

    The securitization or structured finance market has evolved from its early origins focused primarily on financial assets (e.g., mortgages, receivables, loans credit card accounts, etc.) to the world of non-traditional or esoteric securitizations with exciting new assets.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, White & Case, Private equity
    Authors:
    Elizabeth Devine , Jim Fogarty , David Thatch
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    White & Case
    Arbeitsrechtliche Aspekte im Rahmen einer Sanierung nach dem StaRUG
    2024-06-27

    Das StaRUG eignet sich insbesondere für finanzielle, weniger für personelle, Restrukturierungen

    Das Gesetz über den Stabilisierungs- und Restrukturierungsrahmen für Unternehmen,kurz „StaRUG″ ist zum 1. Januar 2021 in Kraft getreten und setzt die sog. Restrukturierungsrichtlinie (Richtlinie [EU] 2019/1023) um.

    Filed under:
    European Union, Germany, Banking, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Germany
    Authors:
    Dr. Boris Alles , Dr. Felix Fuchs , Dr. Veronika Hefner
    Location:
    European Union, Germany
    Firm:
    CMS Germany
    Potential Impact of UCC Article 12 on Fund Finance Transactions
    2024-06-28

    At the bottom of the stack in investment fund structures, there are generally “real” assets—things like equity interests in portfolio companies, mortgage loans, commercial receivables, maybe even bricks and mortar. Fund finance transactions, though, are by design crafted to be at several levels removed from such underlying assets. With such ultimate assets remote from the transaction, it may seem to fund finance practitioners that concerns about changes in the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) relating to the nature of collateral assets are just as remote.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    Chris McDermott , Trent E. Lindsay , Eric Starr
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Current page 17
    • Page 18
    • Page 19
    • Page 20
    • Page 21
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days