China’s corporate income tax (« CIT ») regime effective from January 1, 2008 explicitly requires corporate restructuring transactions to be effected at fair value so that any gain or loss shall be recognised for tax purpose at the time when the transaction takes place. The Chinese State Administration of Taxation (« SAT ») has released several tax circulars in recent years to address the detailed CIT treatments (e.g. the availability of tax deferral treatment for a corporate restructuring meeting certain prescribed criteria), the documentation and procedural requirements, etc.
The Judicial Committee of the Supreme People’s Court has passed a notice regarding overdue fines on unpaid taxes of a bankrupt enterprise. This came into effect on 12 July 2012.
On December 29, 2008, the State Administration for Taxation (SAT) and the Ministry of Finance (MOF) jointly promulgated the Circular on Several Deed Tax Policies Concerning Enterprise Reorganization and Restructuring, (Cai Shui (2008) 175, Circular 175). Circular 175 took effect on January 1, 2009, and will be effective through December 31, 2011.
New tax rules relating to the tax treatment of certain corporate restructuring transactions are expected to be finalized soon by the PRC Ministry of Finance (“MOF”) and the State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”).
El Lic. Agustín Meléndez, asesor jurídico de la Dirección General del Registro Público, informo que el Registro Nacional no aplicará de forma automática la sanción de disolución dispuesta en el art. 6 de la Ley Impuesto a Personas Jurídicas. Por el contrario, tiene dispuesto llevar a cabo un debido proceso tendiente, en todo momento, a facilitar el pago del tributo, recurriendo como última instancia a la cancelación del asiento de inscripción.
Following huge trading losses and the discovery of alleged fraud in a Singaporean subsidiary, O.W. Bunker & Trading A.S. filed for bankruptcy on 7 November 2014in the Danish court, just seven months after the company floated on the stock market. Since then, a number of other O.W. Bunker Danish and overseas entities have also filed for bankruptcy.
To date, a debt waiver has been frequently used as a tool to successfully restructure German-based companies in financial difficulties.
We ended 2019 wondering whether Brexit would remain as allconsuming as it had been the previous three years. Cue the COVID-19 pandemic. We hope this newsletter finds you, your colleagues and your family in good health and adjusted to the new 'normal'. We look back at the first three months of 2020, unforgettable in more ways than one, and how current developments may impact our future.
To date, a debt waiver has been frequently used as a tool to successfully restructure German based companies in financial difficulties. A decision of the German Federal Fiscal Court (Bundesfinanzhof) published on February 8, 2017 currently limits such an option, given that it held that one of the main instruments used by tax authorities to grant relief from an otherwise taxable cancellation of debt income (CODI) in the form of the so-called Restructuring Decree (Sanierungserlass) violates fundamental constitutional rights.
Cancellation of debt a key element of most restructurings generally triggers taxable income. The German tax authorities had issued an administrative decree (the "Tax Restructuring Decree" - Sanierungserlass), however, declaring that, upon the satisfaction of certain requirements and conditioned on forfeiture of any loss carry forwards, the cancellation of debt income ("CODI") would not be taxed.