Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Post-script – recent Enron “settlement payment” decision has first beneficiary
    2011-08-03

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Security (finance), Default (finance), Subsidiary, Enron, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Benjamin C. Wolf
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Roseton Ol, LLC v. Dynegy Holdings, Inc., C.A. no. 6689-VCP (Del. Ch. July 29, 2011) (Parsons, V.C.)
    2011-08-08

    In this memorandum opinion, the Court of Chancery denied the plaintiffs’ (Roseton OL LLC and Danskammer OL, LLC) motion seeking to temporarily restrain the consummation of a transaction pursuant to which defendant Dynegy Holdings, Inc. (“DHI”) would transfer its most profitable power plants from existing subsidiaries to new bankruptcy remote subsidiaries.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Injunction, Natural gas, Limited liability company, Preliminary injunction, Electricity generation, Line of credit, Subsidiary, Memorandum opinion, Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
    Variations to charges: High Court dismisses the appeal in Octaviar
    2011-02-02

    Key Points: The High Court held there was no variation in the terms of the Charge and therefore no registration was required.

    On 1 September 2010 the High Court handed down its much anticipated decision in the appeal from the Queensland Court of Appeal in Re Octaviar Ltd (No 7) [2009] QCA 282, unanimously dismissing the appeal in Public Trustee of Queensland v Fortress Credit Corporation (Aus) 11 Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 29.

    The fixed and floating charge

    Filed under:
    Australia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clayton Utz, Credit (finance), Surety, Debt, Deed, Liability (financial accounting), Legal burden of proof, Capital punishment, Subsidiary, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Queensland Supreme Court, High Court of Australia
    Authors:
    John Loxton
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Clayton Utz
    Victorian Court of Appeal clarifies preference law
    2010-07-01

    Before 1993, the question of whether a creditor of a corporation being wound up had received an unfair preference from that corporation was determined under section 122 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). In 1993, a new Part 5.7B was inserted into the Corporations Act to deal with voidable transactions such as unfair preferences. Since then two lines of divergent judicial authority have developed:

    Filed under:
    Australia, Victoria, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Unsecured debt, Debt, Reinsurance, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Subsidiary, MetLife, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Victoria Supreme Court, High Court of Australia
    Authors:
    David Porter , Steven Palmer
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Sons of Gwalia and the CAMAC report – implications for shareholders and creditors
    2009-08-12

    Effectively, the High Court held that aggrieved shareholders (shareholders whose debt arises as a result of misrepresentation or improper disclosure by the company causing the shareholder to acquire shares) would be ranked equally with the debts of other unsecured creditors.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Piper Alderman, Shareholder, Unsecured debt, Dividends, Class action, Consideration, Debt, Misrepresentation, Liquidation, Subsidiary, Title retention clause, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Piper Alderman
    A guide for directors of subsidiary companies in Austria
    2011-08-22

    Welcome to our guide for directors and prospective directors of subsidiary companies in Austria.

    Filed under:
    Austria, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Subsidiary
    Location:
    Austria
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    Telecommunications giant files for Brazil's biggest bankruptcy request
    2016-07-18

    On 20 June 2016, Rio de Janeiro-based Oi SA, Brazil’s fourth-largest telecom company, filed the largest judicial reorganisation petition in Brazil’s history, days after debt restructuring talks with creditors collapsed. The filing of Oi and six subsidiaries lists 65.4 billion reais (USD19.26 billion) in debt. The company has also filed for Chapter 15 protection in the U.S.  As from the date of filing the accrual of interests, penalties, monetary correction and late charges are suspended and will only become enforceable if the judicial reorganisation becomes a bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    Brazil, Insolvency & Restructuring, Telecoms, DAC Beachcroft, Share (finance), Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Broadband, Debt, Investment banking, Investment funds, Cashflow, Subsidiary, Bond credit rating, Debt restructuring
    Authors:
    Anthony Menzies , Jorge Salgado-González
    Location:
    Brazil
    Firm:
    DAC Beachcroft
    The first creditor schemes of arrangement to be sanctioned in the BVI
    2010-10-19

    The First Creditor Driven Schemes

    The Commercial Court has very recently sanctioned four schemes of arrangement pursuant to section 179A of the BVI Business Companies Act 2004. These were the first two creditor-driven schemes to be proposed and sanctioned in the BVI. There has been one other scheme proposed and sanctioned in the BVI but this was a member’s scheme and was altogether more straightforward. Ogier BVI was instructed in relation to all four schemes.

    The First Scheme

    Filed under:
    British Virgin Islands, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ogier, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Arbitration award, Debt, Liquidation, Holding company, Subsidiary, Commercial Court (England and Wales)
    Location:
    British Virgin Islands
    Firm:
    Ogier
    Government reforms to address phoenixing
    2017-11-01

    The Government has released a consultation paper as part of their commitment to ongoing reform of Australia’s corporate insolvency regime.  Phoenix activity refers to both legitimate business rescue activities and serial insolvency to avoid debts.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Gilbert + Tobin, Bankruptcy, Liquidator (law), Subsidiary, Australian Taxation Office
    Authors:
    Peter Reeves , Georgina Willcock , Jack Coles , Marcus Wong
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Gilbert + Tobin
    Intercreditor releases – the junior creditors strike back
    2010-10-05

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    European Union, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case, Share (finance), Shareholder, Surety, Debtor, Liability (financial accounting), Holding company, Subsidiary, Leverage (finance), Barclays, Trustee
    Authors:
    Stephen Phillips , Mark Glengarry
    Location:
    European Union
    Firm:
    White & Case

    Pagination

    • Current page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days