Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Federal Appellate Court Rules That Post-Acceleration Payment in Bankruptcy Constitutes Optional Redemption
    2016-12-06

    The linked Mintz Levin client advisory discusses a recent Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that held a “make-whole” optional redemption premium to be due upon a refinancing of corporate debt following its automatic acceleration upon bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Leonard Weiser-Varon
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Insider Loans Equitably Subordinated
    2016-01-22

    In SGK Ventures, LLC, the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois ordered that the secured claims of two entities controlled by insiders of the debtor be equitably subordinated to the claims of unsecured creditors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Did the Supreme Court finally explain Marathon and Stern? Executive benefits’ impact on bankruptcy court jurisdiction
    2014-06-27

    The Supreme Court has spoken once again on the limited jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts, adding to the understanding derived from Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982), Granfinanciera v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33 (1989), Langenkamp v. Culp, 498 U.S. 42 (1990) and Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011). Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkinson, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc., 573 U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, SCOTUS, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Eric R. Blythe
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    China’s Suntech bankruptcy
    2013-04-01

    On March 20, Suntech, a Chinese solar manufacturing company, declared bankruptcy. Questions have arisen on how the country’s solar industry will now cope with overcapacity issues which stem from a decline in demand from Europe. The declaration comes a week after the company announced it had defaulted on $541 million of bonds.

    Filed under:
    China, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mintz
    Authors:
    R. Neal Martin
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Financial services legislative and regulatory update - 14 May 2012
    2012-05-14

    Leading the Past Week

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Mintz, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA), Chair of the Federal Reserve
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Holders of "dirt bonds" may lack plan voting rights in developer bankruptcies
    2011-09-21

    In a decision that may have implications for holders of community development district bonds and other similar “dirt bonds,” a Florida bankruptcy court has ruled that holders of community development district bonds do not always have plan voting rights when the underlying developer — as opposed to the development district itself — is the bankruptcy debtor.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Real Estate, Mintz, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Voting, Municipal bond, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Middle District of Florida, Trustee
    Authors:
    William W. Kannel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 Amends Bankruptcy Code
    2021-02-02

    As discussed in previousposts, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (the “Act”) was signed into law on December 27, 2020, largely to address the harsh economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Coronavirus
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Small Business Chapter 11 Eligibility Expanded Under CARES Act
    2020-04-02

    President Trump signed the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (the “SBRA”) into law in August of last year and it became effective on February 20, 2020. The SBRA amended the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and is designed to simplify and shorten the reorganization process for “small businesses” and to make the entire process more cost effective. At the same time that the SBRA was coming online, the U.S. economy experienced a severe downturn as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mintz, Donald Trump, Coronavirus, CARES Act 2020 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Insolvent “On Behalf Of” Municipal Bond Issuers: Chapter 9, Chapter 11, or Ineligible?
    2018-02-26

    Last week, President Trump unveiled his proposal to fix our nation’s aging infrastructure. While the proposal lauded $1.5 trillion in new spending, it only included $200 billion in federal funding. To bridge this sizable gap, the plan largely relies on public private partnerships (often referred to as P3s) that can use tax-exempt bond financing.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Tax, Mintz, Internal Revenue Service (USA), US District Court for Northern District of Illinois
    Authors:
    William W. Kannel , Charles W. Azano
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Make-Whole Momentum Halted: Third Circuit Rejects Momentive Rationale and Requires Debtor to Pay Make-Whole Premium
    2016-11-28

    In a recent decision (“Energy Future Holdings”) poised to have wide-reaching implications, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decisions of the Bankruptcy and the District Courts to hold that a debtor cannot use a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing to escape liability for a “make-whole” premium if express contractual language requires such payment when the borrower makes an optional redemption prior to a date certain.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz
    Authors:
    Kaitlin R. Walsh
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 22
    • Page 23
    • Page 24
    • Page 25
    • Page 26
    • Page 27
    • Current page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days