Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Texas Court Declines to Adopt Rule Holding Violation of Law Is Per Se Bad Faith in Fraudulent Transfer Actions
    2018-07-13

    The Bottom Line

    The District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently held in Segner v. Ruthven Oil & Gas, LLC, No. 3:12-CV-1318-B, 2018 WL 3155827 (N.D. Tex. June 28, 2018) that failure to comply with a disclosure law when documenting a transaction does not deprive a defendant in a fraudulent transfer action from asserting a good faith defense.

    What Happened?

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, US District Court for Northern District of Texas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Supreme Court Issues Decision on Section 546(e) Safe Harbor Provision Resolving Long-Standing Circuit Split
    2018-02-28

    On February 27, 2018, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous opinion, authored by Justice Sotomayor, resolving a Circuit split over the interpretation of Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, the “safe harbor” provision that shields specified types of payments “made by or to (or for the benefit of)” a financial institution from avoidance on fraudulent transfer grounds.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, SCOTUS
    Authors:
    Andrew Wyatt Pollack
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Ninth Circuit Joins “Minority” of Courts That Allow Property to be Sold in Bankruptcy Free and Clear of Leaseholds
    2017-08-11

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Ninth Circuit, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Philip Michael Guffy
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Ninth Circuit Applies Replacement Value in Cramdown Even If Lower Than Liquidation Value
    2017-06-01

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, US HUD, Ninth Circuit
    Authors:
    Marsha Sukach
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Second Circuit Overturns Southern District in Marblegate
    2017-01-24

    On Jan. 17, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the decision of the District Court for the Southern District of New York in Marblegate Asset Management, LLC v.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    Christopher Auguste , John Bessonette , Richard E. Farley , Jamie D. Kocis , Jennifer Li Godyn , Nathan Hyman , Daniel Michaelson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    No Turnover of the Make-whole Amount in the EFH Bankruptcy
    2016-08-16

    In a pair of decisions in 2015, the United States Bankruptcy Court of the District of Delaware determined that neither the first lien notes trustee nor the second lien notes trustee of Energy Future Intermediate Holdings Corp. (“EFIH”), a subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings (“EFH”), was entitled to receive a make-whole on the repayment of the corresponding indebtedness resulting from the acceleration of that debt in the EFH bankruptcy case.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Interest, Debt, Liquidation, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, US District Court for District of Delaware, Trustee
    Authors:
    Jennifer R. Sharret
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Bad faith filing no obstacle for hotel reorganization
    2013-08-19

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Injunction, Foreclosure, Bad faith, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Alice J. Byowitz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Junior noteholder gets “ZING’d” as Bankruptcy Court allows involuntary filing of CDO issuer by senior noteholder
    2011-10-31

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Liquidation, Collateralized debt obligation, Bank of New York Mellon, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of New Jersey, Trustee
    Authors:
    Lauren Macksoud
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Special purpose entities – the new Chapter 11 debtors: General Growth bankruptcy court takes the “remoteness” out of bankruptcy structured financings
    2009-08-17

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Mortgage loan, Bad faith, Refinancing, Commercial mortgage-backed security, Memorandum opinion, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, MetLife, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Second Circuit Holds That So-Called “Flip” Clause Payments Are Protected by Section 560 of the Bankruptcy Code
    2020-09-08

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Collateralized debt obligation, Credit default swap, Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit, Trustee
    Authors:
    David E. Blabey, Jr
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 3215
    • Page 3216
    • Page 3217
    • Page 3218
    • Current page 3219
    • Page 3220
    • Page 3221
    • Page 3222
    • Page 3223
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days