Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court Rejects “Implied Assumption” of Executory Contracts As Part of Asset Sale
    2018-03-07

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Authors:
    Philip Michael Guffy
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court Approves Separate Classification and Disparate Gifted Consideration Between General Unsecured Creditors
    2017-08-15

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Authors:
    Priya K. Baranpuria
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Jurisdiction Retention Clause in Sale Order Can’t Provide Bankruptcy Court Subject Matter Jurisdiction for Contract Disputes between Non-Debtors
    2017-06-13

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, First Circuit
    Authors:
    Tuvia Peretz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Can a Noteholder Sue Under TIA § 316(b) to Recover Accelerated Debt?
    2017-02-28

    In a decision last month, DCF Capital, LLC v. US Shale Solutions, LLC (Sup. Ct. NY Co. Jan. 24, 2017), a New York State Supreme Court justice held that a noteholder that had properly accelerated indenture debt may sue to collect that debt notwithstanding the operation of a standard no-action clause. This holding, while appealing from a noteholder perspective, may not be compelled by Section 316(b) of the Trust Indenture Act on which it rests and is contrary to some prior case law.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, UBS, Second Circuit, US District Court for SDNY, Tenth Circuit, New York Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Abbe L. Dienstag
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Use of Tender Offers in Bankruptcy to Effect a Pre-confirmation Settlement
    2016-08-16

    The Third Circuit recently affirmed that a debtor in Chapter 11 can use a tender offer to settle claims without running afoul of the Bankruptcy Code. Although In re Energy Future Holdings Corp.is limited to its particular facts and circumstances, the decision could lead to increased use of tender offers prior to confirmation of a bankruptcy plan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Maturity (finance), Leveraged buyout, Tender offer, Accrued interest, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    John Bessonette , Nathan Hyman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    It’s called "adequate" – not "automatic" – protection
    2013-09-12

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Legal burden of proof, Tax lien, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Courts look closer at bankruptcy remote financing deals and find they may be lacking
    2012-01-03

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Accounts receivable, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit, US District Court for Northern District of Illinois
    Authors:
    Darren Halverson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Stern v. Marshall – bankruptcy court jurisdiction: cut to the core
    2011-07-11

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Punitive damages, Bankruptcy, Debtor, US Constitution, Article III US Constitution, SCOTUS, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Joshua Friedman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Subordination Agreements and Cramdown — Strict Enforcement or Rough Justice?
    2020-10-08

    In the latest decision arising out of long-running disputes over confirmation of the Tribune Company’s Chapter 11 plan, the Third Circuit issued important new guidance concerning the enforceability of subordination agreements in cramdown plans, holding (1) that subordination agreements “need not be strictly enforced” in such plans, and (2) that the relevant comparison, for determining unfair discrimination, need not always be a comparison between the recovery of the preferred class and the dissenting class, but may sometimes entail a comparison between the dissenting class’s desired and act

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Discrimination, Title 11 of the US Code, Third Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    The “Customer” Argument: An Expansion of the Section 546(e) Safe Harbor?
    2020-02-06

    Introduction

    In February 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion that, at first blush, appeared to severely curtail the scope of the transferee protections provided by Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, the “safe harbor” provision that shields specified types of payments from a bankruptcy trustee’s avoidance powers, including transfers “made by or to (or for the benefit of)” a “financial institution” in connection with a “securities contract.” A recent decision from the Second Circuit breathes fresh life into the defense.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Safe harbor (law), Leveraged buyout, SCOTUS, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    David E. Blabey, Jr
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 3217
    • Page 3218
    • Page 3219
    • Page 3220
    • Current page 3221
    • Page 3222
    • Page 3223
    • Page 3224
    • Page 3225
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days