Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    High Court gives independent trustee power to distribute the surplus on a scheme wind-up
    2008-09-30

    In Bridge Trustees Limited v Noel Penny, Judge Purle QC, sitting as an additional Judge of the High Court, held that the Court could use its inherent jurisdiction to permit an independent trustee to distribute surplus in a scheme that was winding-up. Under the Pensions Act 1995, an independent trustee is appointed to exercise powers otherwise conferred on the employer where an insolvency practitioner begins to act in relation to a company.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Costs in English law, Fiduciary, Liquidation, Capital punishment, Pensions Act 1995 (UK), High Court of Justice, Trustee
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
    Change is coming…
    2009-04-23

    The Chancellor’s Budget Report on 22 April included the following statement:

    ‘The Government will work to ensure that the regulations and procedures for dealing with troubled companies work to facilitate company rescues whenever they are appropriate, that the maximum economic value is rescued from companies that get into difficulties, and that the knock-on effects of company insolvencies on their creditors are minimised. Budget 2009 announces that the Insolvency Service will consult on:  

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Moratorium (law), Debtor in possession, Corporate bond
    Authors:
    Ken Baird
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
    The Belgian Act on Continuity
    2009-04-01

    New restructuring legislation was recently adopted in Belgium and comes into force on 1 April 2009. The Act of 31 January 2009 on the continuity of undertakings (the Act on Continuity) aims to replace the existing judicial composition procedure (concordat judiciaire/ gerechtelijk akkoord) with a more effective and flexible restructuring instrument.  

    The key features of the Act on Continuity are:

    Filed under:
    Belgium, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Accounts receivable, Interest, Employment contract, Debt, Moratorium (law)
    Location:
    Belgium
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
    Contractor insolvency – be prepared
    2009-03-17

    In the construction industry, contractor insolvency delays projects, increases costs and may deprive the employer of remedies and third parties of meaningful warranty protection. In 2008, it was reported that the number of construction firms facing grave financial concerns was 547 per cent higher than in 2007 (Building, 14 November 2008). As contractor insolvencies are likely to increase in 2009, how can an employer protect its position at the start of a project and when contractor insolvency occurs?  

    Contractual safeguards  

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Bond (finance), Surety, Collateral (finance), General contractor, Independent contractor, Option (finance), Subcontractor, Withholding tax, Warranty, Default (finance), Subsidiary, Parent company, House of Lords
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
    French insolvency law
    2009-02-13

    Although safeguard proceedings have been used successfully as a negotiation tool in a number of high-profile cases (such as the Eurotunnel case), they have represented just 1 per cent of all insolvency proceedings in France since the Business Safeguard Act 2005 introduced the safeguard procedure in January 2006. The main reason for this lack of success is the continuing stigma that is attached to insolvency proceedings in France.

    Filed under:
    France, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Bond (finance), Credit (finance), Debtor, Waiver, Debt, Voting, Investment funds, Cashflow, Default (finance)
    Location:
    France
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
    Surviving the downturn
    2009-02-02

    Survival  

    Debt maturity profile Companies should ensure that they have a very clear understanding of the timing of their cash needs and in particular of the maturity profile of their debt – when does debt fall due and when will refinancing be required?  

    Filed under:
    Asia-Pacific, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Bond (finance), Market liquidity, Covenant (law), Consideration, Hedge funds, Debt, Insider trading, Stock exchange, Joint venture, Maturity (finance), Refinancing, Tender offer, Secured loan
    Location:
    Asia-Pacific
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
    Who is ‘connected’ or ‘associated’?
    2009-01-21

    Pensions and insolvency legislation uses the test in the Insolvency Act 1986 for assessing whether a person is ‘connected’ or ‘associated’ with another. This test is important because various statutory provisions use it, especially in limiting the persons whom the Pensions Regulator can make responsible for pension scheme deficits under the ‘moral hazard’ powers in the Pensions Act 2004. This briefing gives an outline of the statutory provisions and points to some difficult areas.  

    Why is this relevant?  

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Share (finance), Shareholder, Beneficiary, Limited liability partnership, Subsidiary, Actuary, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Pension Protection Fund, Pensions Act 2004 (UK), The Pensions Regulator, Trustee
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
    High Court sets aside a deed of release that had been executed by mistake
    2008-10-15

    In the case of Andrew Fender v National Westminster Bank PLC Judge Purle QC set aside a deed of release that had been executed in the mistaken belief that the company was no longer indebted to the bank.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Debt, Deed, Secured creditor, Capital punishment, Unsecured creditor, Volunteering, NatWest, High Court of Justice, Trustee
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
    US Bankruptcy Court backs FSDS in Sea Containers case
    2008-09-30

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware has approved a settlement agreement between three Sea Containers companies, their unsecured creditors and the trustees of the two pension schemes belonging to the UK subsidiary Sea Containers Services Limited.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Unsecured debt, Subsidiary, The Pensions Regulator, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
    Business rates as administration expenses
    2007-03-14

    The High Court has considered the payment of business rates as expenses in new-style administrations. Business rates in respect of premises occupied by a company during the course of its administration are ‘necessary disbursements’ under rule 2.67(1)(f) and payable as expenses of the administration, as they are in a liquidation under rule 4.218(1)(m). Rates for unoccupied premises would also appear to be payable as administration expenses, although not as liquidation expenses.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Adoption, Liquidation, Public limited company, Secured creditor, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • Page 11
    • Page 12
    • Current page 13
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Page 17
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days