Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    History matters: historical breaches may undermine assumption of executory contracts
    2011-10-13

    One of the primary fights underlying assumption of an unexpired lease or executory contract has long been over whether any debtor breaches under the agreement are “curable.” Before the 2005 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, courts were split over whether historic nonmonetary breaches (such as a failure to maintain cash reserves or prescribed hours of operation) undermined a debtor’s ability to assume the lease or contract.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Breach of contract, Federal Reporter, Franchise agreement, Default (finance), US Congress, Constitutional amendment, Title 11 of the US Code, Trustee, Ninth Circuit, First Circuit
    Authors:
    Lance Miller
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Third Circuit holds that a portion of post-petition withdrawal liability in bankruptcy is entitled to priority over general unsecured claims
    2011-10-03

    Recently, the Third Circuit held that withdrawal liability triggered after a bankruptcy filing date may be apportioned to pre- and post-petition service for the debtor, and that the withdrawal liability attributable to post-petition service may be entitled to priority over general unsecured claims under the Bankruptcy Code.  Employers that participate in a multiemployer pension plan should determine the claims impact of withdrawal in light of this court decision and also assess whether filing for bankruptcy protection outside of the Third Circuit is appropriate.  

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McDermott Will & Emery, Bankruptcy, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Debtor, Unsecured debt, Memorandum of understanding, Liability (financial accounting), Collective bargaining agreements, Vesting, Constitutional amendment, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Raymond M. Fernando
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    McDermott Will & Emery
    Drafting tips for trademark licenses: is your trademark agreement a trademark license, a service agreement—or both? The answer could affect the ability of a licensee in bankruptcy to assign rights regarding the trademark.
    2011-09-14

    In re XMH Corp., Nos. 10-2596, 10-2597, 10- 2598 and 10-2599 (7th Cir. July 26, 2011)  

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently answered the following questions: (a) whether, under the Bankruptcy Code, a trademark license is assignable (that is, salable) without the licensor’s permission, in the absence of a clause in the agreement stating that it is assignable (NO); and (b) whether a trademark license can be “implied” in an agreement that does not say it’s a trademark license (NO).

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Marketing, Constitutional amendment, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Fruehauf opinion illustrates that despite a preference to allow amendment of pleadings, courts won't always allow amendment
    2011-08-10

    Summary

    In a 23 page decision signed July 15, 2011, Judge Walsh of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court denied a motion to allow a plaintiff to file an amended complaint, holding that the amended complaint was too deficient to survive a motion to dismiss and therefore would not be allowed. Judge Walsh’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Fraud, Statute of limitations, Federal Reporter, Liquidation, Constitutional amendment, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Potential ramifications of the Madoff investment crisis
    2009-01-26

    Investors victimized by the fraud perpetrated by Bernard Madoff and his company, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC (collectively Madoff), should be aware of their legal options and risks. Some of these options have very short deadlines. Likewise, investors who successfully withdrew their investments before Madoff`s fraud came to light could face potential claims. In either circumstance, the prospects of litigation are high.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, White Collar Crime, Foley & Lardner LLP, Bankruptcy, Security (finance), Fraud, Class action, Statute of limitations, Taxable income, Option (finance), Liquidation, Tax deduction, Tax return (USA), Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Constitutional amendment, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Delaware bankruptcy court overrules objection of lone dissenting syndicate lender to collateral agent's credit bid
    2009-04-09

    One of the key protections afforded to secured creditors under the Bankruptcy Code is the right of a holder of a secured claim to credit bid the allowed amount of its claim as part of a sale process under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code. Specifically, section 363(k) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that:

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Waiver, Debt, Secured loan, Constitutional amendment, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Brad B. Erens
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Judicial dissolution or restructuring the joint venture: which would you prefer?
    2009-05-15

    On January 13, 2009, in Fisk Ventures, LLC v. Segal, the Court of Chancery of Delaware considered the petition by an investor to have Genetrix, LLC dissolved because it was no longer “reasonably practicable” to continue to operate the company when the company had no operating revenue, no prospects of equity or debt infusion, a deadlocked board of directors and an operating agreement that gave no means of navigating around the deadlock. The court found in favor of the investor and concluded that judicial dissolution was the best and only option for the members in the company.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Board of directors, Limited liability company, Debt, Joint venture, Economy, Refinancing, Dissolution (law), Constitutional amendment, Court of Chancery
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Weathering the storm: savings clauses: fraudulent transfer issues in the TOUSA bankruptcy case
    2009-10-21

    On October 13, 2009, a Florida bankruptcy judge in the TOUSA, Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Haynes and Boone LLP, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Credit (finance), Surety, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Debt, Joint venture, Joint and several liability, Subsidiary, Constitutional amendment, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Haynes and Boone LLP
    Brexit: Keep Calm and Carry On
    2016-07-01

    As the country recovers from the shock outcome of last Thursday’s Referendum, the question which Restructuring professionals must now consider is “what does Brexit mean for me?”. The truth is that nobody really knows. The Referendum decision is not legally binding on the UK Government and the process of the UK leaving the EU will only start once the UK has served formal notice on the EU pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on the European Union. This will start a two year negotiation period to effect Brexit.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Squire Patton Boggs, Lobbying, Brexit, Breach of contract, Climate change mitigation, Supply chain, Internal market, Tariff, Force majeure, Trade barrier, Tax efficiency, Constitutional amendment
    Authors:
    John Alderton , Caroline Castle
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Unfinished Business: Insolvency Rules 2016 and changes still to come
    2017-05-24

    The Insolvency Rules (England and Wales) 2016 (“IR2016”) came into force on 6 April 2016 applying to most corporate and personal insolvency regimes in England and Wales. However, there is still unfinished business for the Government and further regulation is expected to be introduced later this year to ensure the changes apply uniformly in all areas.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Squire Patton Boggs, Constitutional amendment, Time (magazine), High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Helen Kavanagh , James Moore
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Current page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • Page 11
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days