Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Brexit - A changing legal landscape?
    2016-06-28

    June 2016 BREXIT A changing legal landscape? 1 INTRODUCTION Yesterday, the UK public voted for the UK to leave the European Union ( EU). This briefing discusses, in outline, the potential timetable for Brexit, the possible shape that Brexit might take and the potential impact Brexit might have on certain areas of law relevant to your business.

    Filed under:
    European Union, OECD, United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Competition & Antitrust, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Patents, Tax, Addleshaw Goddard LLP, Brexit, Single market, Internal market, Tariff, Free trade area, European Commission, European Economic Area, European Parliament, European Council, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
    Location:
    European Union, OECD, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Addleshaw Goddard LLP
    Brexit: Keep Calm and Carry On
    2016-07-01

    As the country recovers from the shock outcome of last Thursday’s Referendum, the question which Restructuring professionals must now consider is “what does Brexit mean for me?”. The truth is that nobody really knows. The Referendum decision is not legally binding on the UK Government and the process of the UK leaving the EU will only start once the UK has served formal notice on the EU pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on the European Union. This will start a two year negotiation period to effect Brexit.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Squire Patton Boggs, Lobbying, Brexit, Breach of contract, Climate change mitigation, Supply chain, Internal market, Tariff, Force majeure, Trade barrier, Tax efficiency, Constitutional amendment
    Authors:
    John Alderton , Caroline Castle
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Legal fees for assistance to the debtor in concordato preventivo: does the judicial or extra-judicial professional tariff apply?
    2018-02-26

    The Supreme Court of Cassation (19 October 2017, No. 24682) discerns the respective scope of application of the criteria for the liquidation of compensation to the lawyer in case there was no specific agreement between the parties

    The case

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Nctm Studio Legale, Debtor, Liquidation, Tariff, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    FSA makes new rules
    2010-04-01

    FSA made five sets of new rules at its March board meeting:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Retail, Credit risk, Standing (law), Tariff, Building society, FSA
    Authors:
    Robert Finney
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Commerce Department drops challenge to section 363 asset sale
    2011-04-22

    The federal government has stopped fighting court rulings that allowed an import company, which was facing steep penalty tariffs, to file bankruptcy and transfer its assets to a new business formed by the debtor's principals. The move is important to small to mid-size companies that want to rid themselves of substantial liabilities by selling assets to a new entity with identical ownership, "free and clear" under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Dumping (pricing policy), Investment banking, Liability (financial accounting), Tariff, Valuation (finance), US Department of Commerce, US Federal Government, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Armstrong Teasdale LLP
    Brexit: Keep Calm and Carry On
    2016-07-01

    As the country recovers from the shock outcome of last Thursday’s Referendum, the question which Restructuring professionals must now consider is “what does Brexit mean for me?”. The truth is that nobody really knows. The Referendum decision is not legally binding on the UK Government and the process of the UK leaving the EU will only start once the UK has served formal notice on the EU pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on the European Union. This will start a two year negotiation period to effect Brexit.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Squire Patton Boggs, Lobbying, Brexit, Breach of contract, Climate change mitigation, Supply chain, Internal market, Tariff, Force majeure, Trade barrier, Tax efficiency, Constitutional amendment
    Authors:
    John Alderton , Caroline Castle
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    FSA makes new rules
    2010-04-01

    FSA made five sets of new rules at its March board meeting:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Retail, Credit risk, Standing (law), Tariff, Building society, FSA
    Authors:
    Robert Finney
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Legal fees for assistance to the debtor in concordato preventivo: does the judicial or extra-judicial professional tariff apply?
    2018-02-26

    The Supreme Court of Cassation (19 October 2017, No. 24682) discerns the respective scope of application of the criteria for the liquidation of compensation to the lawyer in case there was no specific agreement between the parties

    The case

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Nctm Studio Legale, Debtor, Liquidation, Tariff, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days