Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Effect of acceleration upon a Chapter 11 filing on enforceability of make-whole or prepayment premiums
    2012-05-14

    Indentures often contain make-whole premiums payable upon early redemption of the debt, and term B loan agreements often include "soft call" protection in the form of prepayment premiums during the early life of the loan. If the debt issuer becomes subject to a chapter 11 proceeding after the debt issuance, the question then arises as to how this payment obligation is to be treated: Does the make-whole or prepayment premium constitute unmatured interest due as a result of the debt acceleration, which would be disallowed, or is it liquidated damages?

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Debtor, Interest, Debt, Maturity (finance), Liquidated damages
    Authors:
    Vanessa G. Spiro
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Senior class gifting is not the end of the story: some recent developments regarding the absolute priority rule and the new value exception
    2011-08-10

    Much attention in the commercial bankruptcy world has been devoted recently to judicial pronouncements concerning whether the practice of senior creditor class “gifting” to junior classes under a chapter 1 1 plan violates the Bankruptcy Code’s “absolute priority rule.” Comparatively little scrutiny, by contrast, has been directed toward significant developments in ongoing controversies in the courts regarding the absolute priority rule outside the realm of senior class gifting— namely, in connection with the “new value” exception to the rule and whether the rule was written out of the Bankr

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Consent decree, Consumer protection, Interest, Federal Reporter, US Congress, Bank of America, SCOTUS, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Charles M. Oellermann , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Italian Supreme Court recognizes that judiciary has limited powers to review arrangements with creditors
    2011-08-01

    During the last few years, Italian bankruptcy law has been shifting from a traditional "procedural/judicial" model, based on the central role of courts called upon to safeguard the "public interest" involved in bankruptcy by actively directing the procedure and making the most important decisions, to a model that recognizes the private interests of creditors. Under the new paradigm, creditors are conferred with decisional powers, while courts maintain a principally supervisory role.

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, Liquidation, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
    Authors:
    Francesco Squerzoni
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    PROMESA Shields Puerto Rico Behind a New Automatic Stay
    2016-07-21

    On June 30, 2016, President Obama signed the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA)[1] into law. A copy of the Act can be found here.

    Filed under:
    Puerto Rico, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave), Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Letter of credit, Debtor, Commodity broker, Economy, Exclusive jurisdiction, Stay of execution, Municipal bond, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    Puerto Rico, USA
    Firm:
    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave)
    Good news and bad news for corporate managers dealing with insolvency issues
    2007-06-18

    Directors and officers of Delaware corporations face no liability to corporate creditors from direct claims for breach of fiduciary duty, under the Delaware Supreme Court’s recent ruling in North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Gheewalla, (May 18, 2007) (“North American Catholic”).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave), Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Insider trading, Good faith, Due diligence, Non-disclosure agreement, Delaware General Corporation Law, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Barclays, Delaware Supreme Court, US District Court for SDNY, Colorado Supreme Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave)
    Co-operation from the Co-op, but more bail-ins to follow?
    2013-07-08

    A look at the recent restructuring of the Co-operative Bank and EU proposals for mandatory reform

    The Co-operative Bank announced in mid-June that it would need to carry out a forced listing of £300m new shares on the London Stock Exchange to fill a capital hole of around £1.5bn. Co-op's difficulties are said to have been triggered by mounting losses at Britannia Building Society - which Co-Op acquired in 2009 - that were highlighted when the bank failed to follow through on its planned acquisition of 632 Lloyds branches in February this year.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, RPC, Bond (finance), Bail, Bailout, Subordinated debt
    Authors:
    Amy Gallimore
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    RPC
    Common sense counts when construing commercial contracts
    2011-11-17

    In Rainy Sky S.A and six others v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, the Supreme Court provided useful guidance on the role of business common sense in construing a clause in a commercial contract, particularly in circumstances where there are competing plausible constructions, neither of which is clearly preferable on the language used alone.

    The facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, RPC, Bond (finance), Condition precedent, Consideration, Default (finance), Majority opinion, SCOTUS, UK Supreme Court, Singapore High Court
    Authors:
    Daniel Hemming
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    RPC
    公司债券司法实践常见问题三:债券兑付担保合同中的争议
    2017-07-26

    上一篇我们谈到诉讼主体的确定问题,本文将从担保的视角对债券持有人的权利救济予以分析。

    保证人单方出具《保证函》的效力

    Filed under:
    China, Arbitration & ADR, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, King & Wood Mallesons, Bond (finance), Collateral (finance)
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    King & Wood Mallesons
    Holders of "dirt bonds" may lack plan voting rights in developer bankruptcies
    2011-09-21

    In a decision that may have implications for holders of community development district bonds and other similar “dirt bonds,” a Florida bankruptcy court has ruled that holders of community development district bonds do not always have plan voting rights when the underlying developer — as opposed to the development district itself — is the bankruptcy debtor.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Real Estate, Mintz, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Voting, Municipal bond, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Middle District of Florida, Trustee
    Authors:
    William W. Kannel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Bankruptcy Settlements may not have to Comply with the Absolute Priority Rule? Not so fast…
    2016-06-29

    In an earlier blog piece we reported on the Third Circuit’s 2015 decision in In re Jevic Holding Corp. where the Court approved a settlement, implemented through a structured dismissal, which allowed junior creditors to receive a distribution prior to senior creditors being paid in full.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Commercial law, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 (USA), SCOTUS, Trustee
    Authors:
    Eric R. Blythe
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 21
    • Page 22
    • Page 23
    • Page 24
    • Current page 25
    • Page 26
    • Page 27
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days