Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Supreme Court Strikes Down Bankruptcy Courts’ Ability to Order Non-consensual Third-Party Releases
    2024-07-01

    Last week, in a 5-to-4 decision in the case ofHarrington, United States Trustee, Region 2 v. Purdue Pharma L.P, et al., the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the ability of bankruptcy courts to order non-consensual third-party releases (i.e., claims held by non-debtors against non-debtor third parties) as part of a Chapter 11 plan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Venable LLP, Bankruptcy, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Glenn D. Moses , Eric D. Jacobs
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Venable LLP
    Brazil’s Superior Court of Justice Case Law ruled the issue of attorney´s fees when opposing a claim in reorganization and bankruptcy proceedings
    2024-05-31

    Introduction

    On April 9th , the Second Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) unanimously ruled a case law regarding Special Appeals 2.090.060, 2.090.066 and 2.100.114, which were heard by Justice Humberto Martins, for judgment by the repetitive rite.

    The controversial issue, registered as Theme 1,250 in the STJ database, analyzed “whether an award of attorney's fees is due in the event of a claim being upheld in judicial reorganization and bankruptcy proceedings”.

    Filed under:
    Brazil, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Leite Tosto e Barros Advogados, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Paulo Guilherme De Mendonça Lopes , Alexandre Paranhos Tacla Abbruzzini
    Location:
    Brazil
    Firm:
    Leite Tosto e Barros Advogados
    Ability of Creditors' Committees to Prosecute Estate Claims Given a Boost in Delaware Bankruptcy Courts
    2024-05-30

    The practice of conferring "derivative standing" on official creditors' committees or individual creditors to assert claims on behalf of a bankruptcy estate in cases where the debtor or a bankruptcy trustee is unwilling or unable to do so is well-established. However, until recently, Delaware bankruptcy courts have uniformly limited the practice in cases where applicable non-bankruptcy law provides that creditors do not have standing to bring claims on behalf of certain entities.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Delaware Court of Chancery
    Authors:
    T. Daniel Reynolds (Dan)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    “Texas Two Step”: More Than A Legal Expletive? (Esserman v. Bestwall)
    2024-07-05

    The phrase “Texas Two-Step,” as used in bankruptcy, is a legal expletive. Regardless of what the details of a Texas Two-Step might be, the phrase has become synonymous with:

    • abusive behavior;
    • bad faith conduct;
    • a means for swindling creditors;
    • the antithesis of “doing what’s right”;
    • a tool for avoiding liability;
    • etc., etc.

    Describing a legal tactic as a “Texas Two-Step” is like calling that tactic a “#$&*#%R&” or “#*$&.” It’s a legal expletive that means “really, really bad.”

    Filed under:
    USA, Nebraska, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Koley Jessen PC, Bankruptcy, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Donald L. Swanson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Koley Jessen PC
    Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 6—Subchapter V Trustee As Mediator?
    2024-06-06

    On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report.

    This article is the sixth in a series summarizing and condensing the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.” The subject of this article is:

    • whether a Subchapter V trustee should act as a mediator.[Fn. 1]

    Recommendation

    Filed under:
    USA, Nebraska, Insolvency & Restructuring, Koley Jessen PC, Bankruptcy, American Bankruptcy Institute
    Authors:
    Donald L. Swanson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Koley Jessen PC
    Supreme Court Supports Standing for Insurers in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases
    2024-06-06

    This morning, the Supreme Court decided Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., which clarifies that any party with a "direct financial stake in the outcome" of a reorganization has standing as a "party in interest" to object to a Chapter 11 plan. 11 U.S.C. 1109(b). Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Sotomayor held that the debtor's insurer has standing to object even if the plan purports to preserve the insurer's legal rights and thus is said to be "insurance neutral."

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Bankruptcy, Supreme Court of the United States, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Zack Tripp , Joshua Wesneski , Shai Berman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    U.S. Supreme Court: Debtors’ Insurance Company Has Standing to Be Heard in Chapter 11 Proceeding
    2024-06-12

    The U.S. Supreme Court held last week in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. that an insurance company with financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims is a “party in interest” with the right to object to a Chapter 11 reorganization plan.

    Section 1109(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Frost Brown Todd LLP, Bankruptcy, Supreme Court of the United States, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Mark A. Platt , J. Kendrick Wells, IV
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Frost Brown Todd LLP
    Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 7—$7,500,000 Debt Cap
    2024-06-13

    On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report.

    This article is the seventh in a series summarizing and condensing the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.” The subject of this article is:

    • whether the $7,500,000 debt cap for Subchapter V eligibility should remain or revert to an interest-adjusted $3,024,725.

    Recommendation

    Filed under:
    USA, Nebraska, Insolvency & Restructuring, Koley Jessen PC, Bankruptcy, American Bankruptcy Institute
    Authors:
    Donald L. Swanson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Koley Jessen PC
    Client Alert: Critical Vendor in Texas: It’s a Rodeo
    2024-06-13

    In Chapter 11 cases, one of a vendor’s best shots at getting paid its pre-petition debt is being designated as a “critical vendor”.

    In connection with the Zachry Holdings Chapter 11 case filed in the Southern District of Texas on May 21, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court made disturbing comments regarding treatment of critical vendors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shumaker Loop & Kendrick, Bankruptcy, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), Chapter 11, US Bankruptcy Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    David H. Conaway
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Shumaker Loop & Kendrick
    Supreme Court Denies Refunds to Debtors Who Paid Excess Fees to U.S. Trustee
    2024-06-14

    Today, in Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q Hammons Fall 2006, LLC, the Supreme Court held that debtors who paid fees in bankruptcy cases administered by the U.S. Trustee Program are not entitled to any relief, even though the Court previously ruled that those debtors had been unconstitutionally overcharged. This decision is the culmination of several years of litigation concerning differential fee structures across judicial districts.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Bankruptcy, Trustee, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Zack Tripp , Joshua Wesneski , Jacob Altik , Max Bloom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • Page 11
    • Current page 12
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days