Fulltext Search

Ken Baird, Katharina Crinson, Guilhem Bremond, Michael Broeders, Charlotte Ausema, Jan-Philip Wilde, Ana López, Silvia Angós, Mark Liscio and Samantha Braunstein, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

This is an extract from the 2024 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

Mark Goodman, Katie Logan and Jordie Fienberg, Campbells

This is an extract from the 2024 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

Diego Sierra and Jessika Rocha, Von Wobeser y Sierra, SC

This is an extract from the 2024 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

Elizabeth McColm, Brian Bolin and Mitchell Mengden, Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison

This is an extract from the 2024 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

Gianfranco Lotito and Andrés Ignacio Lafuente Quiroz, Cuatrecasas

This is an extract from the 2024 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

Ken Baird, Katharina Crinson, Guilhem Bremond, Michael Broeders, Charlotte Ausema, Jan-Philip Wilde, Ana López, Silvia Angós, Mark Liscio and Samantha Braunstein, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

This is an extract from the 2024 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

Peter Ferrer, Harneys

This is an extract from the 2024 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

This is an Insight article, written by a selected partner as part of GRR's co-published content. Read more on Insight

In summary

A party must meet a high bar before the High Court will modify or reverse a liquidator’s decision, or consent to a party commencing adjudication (or other legal proceedings) against a company in liquidation (ss 284(1)(b) and 248(1)(c) of the Companies Act 1993, respectively).

Both issues have been examined by the Court of Appeal in United Civil Construction Ltd v Hayfield SHA Ltd (In Liq) [2023] NZCA 377. This case illustrates the limited avenues available for a contractor to resolve payment of outstanding debts after a principal goes into liquidation.

Nuo Ji, Lingqi Wang, Jessica Li and Sylvia Zhang, Fangda Partners

This is an extract from the 2024 edition of GRR's The Asia-Pacific Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

In summary

Hajime Ueno, Masaru Shibahara and Kotaro Fuji, Nishimura & Asahi

This is an extract from the 2024 edition of GRR's The Asia-Pacific Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

This is an Insight article, written by a selected partner as part of GRR's co-published content. Read more on Insight