Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Oakland v Wellswood (Yorkshire) Ltd: EAT decides "pre-pack" sales do not transfer employees under TUPE
    2009-07-15

    The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) has decided that the sale of a business by way of a pre-pack administration[1] did not result in a transfer of employees under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, (TUPE Regulations or TUPE).

    TUPE Regulations

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fasken, Contractual term, Bankruptcy, Employment tribunal, Employment contract, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Unfair dismissal, Subsidiary, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Employment Appeal Tribunal
    Authors:
    Claire Mitchell , June Paddock , Peter Rhodes , David Smith
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Fasken
    Restructuring distressed companies – is it time for change?
    2009-07-16

    The European High Yield Association (a trade association representing participants in the European leveraged finance market) is calling for new restructuring laws, warning that the existing regime makes it more likely that a company in financial difficulties will collapse.  

    Libby Elliott looks at the proposals, which are designed to create a formal procedure for restructuring distressed companies.  

    The need for change

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Interest, Stakeholder (corporate), Leverage (finance), Distressed securities
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    The dilemma facing landlords
    2009-06-16

    A question facing many landlords is whether, when a tenant company faces insolvency and shows no intention of continuing to trade from the premises, they should take back the property and seek to relet it?

    There are several key issues here, including:

    • rates liability
    • mitigating losses
    • ability to recover from third parties and former tenants.

    A landlord's decision has often turned on the type of insolvency faced by the tenant.

    If a liquidator disclaims the lease:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Gowling WLG, Surety, Unsecured debt, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Covenant (law), Debt, Deed, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Liquidator (law)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    Devolution and corporate insolvency
    2009-06-23

    The Calman Commission on Scottish Devolution was tasked with recommending changes to the present constitutional arrangements for Scotland. The Commission has now reported and has proposed that the UK Insolvency Service should have responsibility for lawmaking in respect of all elements of Scottish corporate insolvency with "appropriate input from the relevant department(s) of the Scottish Government".

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, MacRoberts LLP, Bankruptcy, Scottish Government, Economy
    Authors:
    Alan Meek , David Flint
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    MacRoberts LLP
    Civil restraint order
    2009-06-24

    The courts have the power to and increasingly will make a civil restraint order where an individual persistently issues claims that are totally without merit.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Gowling WLG, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Interest, Vexatious litigation, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Trustee
    Authors:
    Greg Standing , Ian Weatherall
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    Challengeable transactions revisited
    2009-06-29

    With ever increasing numbers of corporate insolvencies, it is likely that the courts will see an increase in litigation raised by insolvency practitioners and creditors arising out of restructuring arrangements entered into by companies in an attempt to stave off insolvency.

    While debt restructurings must always remain a significant part of the corporate recovery toolkit, all stakeholders must be aware of the underlying rules relating to the challengeability of transactions in the run up to insolvencies.

    There are two main challengeable areas in Scots law:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, MacRoberts LLP, Security (finance), Consideration, Debt, Stakeholder (corporate), Prejudice, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Frances Sim , Alan Meek
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    MacRoberts LLP
    TUPE does not apply to “terminal” administrations
    2009-05-13

    An employment appeal tribunal has ruled that TUPE does not apply to all sales by administrators. On this view, whether TUPE applies will depend on the objectives of the administrator when appointed. In this case it was clear from the outset that continuing to trade was not viable and an immediate sale of the company’s assets was required to secure the best outcome for creditors. That put the administration in the category of “terminal” insolvency proceedings, for which a complete exemption from TUPE applies.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mills & Reeve LLP, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Authors:
    Charles Pigott
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mills & Reeve LLP
    CVAs to replace administration?
    2009-05-13

    The company voluntary arrangement (CVA) is a relatively obscure insolvency procedure whose use has traditionally been overshadowed by administration. A CVA is essentially a contract between a company and its unsecured creditors which sets out the terms on which the company can continue trading. Implementation of a CVA requires the approval of 75 per cent of creditors by value, who vote on the proposal.

    There are two main reasons why CVAs are likely to be used more widely in the future:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mills & Reeve LLP, Retail, Unsecured debt, Landlord, Voting, Moratorium
    Authors:
    Jamie Wheatley
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mills & Reeve LLP
    Employee status
    2009-05-14

    When can shareholders also have employee status?

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bird & Bird LLP, Share (finance), Shareholder, Employment contract, National Insurance, Liquidation, Unfair dismissal, Employment Rights Act 1996 (UK), Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Bird & Bird LLP
    Government thinks about the rescue culture
    2009-05-14

    In the Budget, the Government announced two consultation processes aimed at breathing new life into the rescue culture.

    The Insolvency Service intends to consult on the desirability of super-priority status for funding to companies that are in administration or that are subject to a company voluntary arrangement. Such a super-priority would allow lenders to participate in the restructuring and recovery of such companies to a greater degree.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, MacRoberts LLP, Moratorium
    Authors:
    Alan Meek , David Flint
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    MacRoberts LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 436
    • Page 437
    • Page 438
    • Page 439
    • Current page 440
    • Page 441
    • Page 442
    • Page 443
    • Page 444
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days