Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Stay Extended to Bar Litigation Against Chapter 15 Foreign Representatives but No Ruling on Extraterritoriality of Barton Doctrine
    2020-02-15

    In McKillen v. Wallace (In re Irish Bank Resolution Corp. Ltd.), 2019 WL 4740249 (D. Del. Sept. 27, 2019), the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware had an opportunity to consider, as an apparent matter of first impression, whether the U.S. common law "Barton Doctrine" applies extraterritorially. One of the issues considered by the district court on appeal was whether parties attempting to sue a foreign representative in a chapter 15 case must first obtain permission to sue from the foreign court that appointed the foreign representative.

    Filed under:
    Ireland, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US House of Representatives
    Authors:
    Dan T. Moss , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    Ireland, USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Dispute Resolution Update: Reeling in the Year
    2018-12-11

    In 2018 the Supreme Court delivered its much-awaited decision in the case of SPV OSUS Ltd v HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) Ltd & Ors where it confirmed that the assignment of a claim is unenforceable in Irish law unless the assignment is ancillary to a bona fide transaction or the assignee has a genuine commercial interest in the assignment.

    Filed under:
    Ireland, USA, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mason Hayes & Curran LLP, HSBC
    Authors:
    Conor O’Leary , Liam Guidera , Maurice Phelan
    Location:
    Ireland, USA
    Firm:
    Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
    Ireland adopts the Alternative A Insolvency Remedy under the Cape Town Convention
    2017-05-10

    The Irish Government has signed an Order giving the Cape Town Convention Alternative A insolvency remedy force of law in Ireland.

    The Cape Town Convention creates an international uniform body of law applicable to interests in aircraft assets for the protection of financiers, lessors and conditional sellers and to establish basic remedies available to them under agreements relating to the aircraft assets.

    Filed under:
    Ireland, USA, Aviation, Insolvency & Restructuring, A&L Goodbody
    Location:
    Ireland, USA
    Firm:
    A&L Goodbody
    US Bankruptcy Court recognized Israeli Liquidation Proceeding in a Chapter 15 case
    2015-04-20

    * This article was first published by INSOL International on April 17, 2015.

    Filed under:
    Israel, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, ArentFox Schiff, Liquidation, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    George P. Angelich , George V. Utlik
    Location:
    Israel, USA
    Firm:
    ArentFox Schiff
    Recent Decision in Ampal Confuses Issue Whether Bankruptcy Trustee Can Avoid Extraterritorial Transfer
    2017-04-19

    Courts have held that the Bankruptcy Code's avoidance powers do not apply extraterritorially, SIPC v. Bernard L Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC ("Madoff"),480 B.R. 501 (Bankr. S.D. N.Y. 2012); Barclay v. Swiss Fin. Corp Ltd., 347 B.R. 708 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2006); Societe Generale plc v. Maxwell Commc'n Corp plc "Maxwell I"),186 B.R. 807 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) and others have found to the contrary, Weisfelner v. Blavatnik (In re Lyondell),543 B.R. 127 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016); Sec. Investor Prot. Corp. v. BLMIS (In re BLMIS) , 513 B.R. (S.D.N.Y.

    Filed under:
    Israel, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Horwood Marcus & Berk, Bankruptcy, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Eric (Rick) S. Rein
    Location:
    Israel, USA
    Firm:
    Horwood Marcus & Berk
    Decree Law No. 78 of 31 May 2010 as converted by Law No. 122 of 30 July 2010: additional changes to Italian bankruptcy law
    2011-02-28

    Italian bankruptcy law — Royal Decree No. 267 of 16 March 1942 — (the Bankruptcy Law) underwent a substantial reform between 2005 and 20091, mainly aimed at introducing (i) a more efficient regulation of the pre-bankruptcy agreement procedure (concordato preventivo)2 and (ii) new pre-bankruptcy schemes of arrangements, in the form of the out-of-court debt restructuring plan (piano attestato di risanamento)3 and the debt restructuring agreement (accordo di ristrutturazione dei debiti)4.

    Filed under:
    Italy, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Latham & Watkins LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Debt, Debt restructuring, Bridge loan, Credit crunch
    Authors:
    Riccardo Agostinelli , Andrea Novarese , Maria Cristina Storchi , Paolo Donati
    Location:
    Italy, USA
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    There’s a Chapter 15?: A Look at the Impact of Chapter 15 Bankruptcy Proceedings on Trade Creditors
    2016-01-07

    Recently, Japanese bulk-shipping company Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha sought bankruptcy protection in both Tokyo and New York. The company, which features a fleet of 185 vessels used primarily to transport cargo such as limestone, cement and coal overseas, commenced its United States bankruptcy proceedings by filing a Chapter 15 petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

    Filed under:
    Japan, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Shipping & Transport, Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Kevin M. Capuzzi
    Location:
    Japan, USA
    Firm:
    Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
    Hanjin Shipping Now Under U.S. Bankruptcy Protection: Options for Shippers and Intermediaries
    2016-09-07

    Yesterday afternoon in Newark, New Jersey, Judge John K. Sherwood of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd.'s request to recognize its Korean bankruptcy case and to provide U.S. bankruptcy protection to its assets and operations within the United States. However, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court's protection is subject to another hearing on Friday to sort out what arrangements can be made among the various stakeholders.

    Filed under:
    Japan, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell Ltd, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Asa W. Markel
    Location:
    Japan, USA
    Firm:
    Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell Ltd
    The Magic of Mt. Gox
    2017-11-27

    Arthur C. Clarke famously observed: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Our regulatory, legislative, and judicial systems illustrate this principle whenever new technology exceeds the limits of our existing legal framework and collective legal imagination. Cryptocurrency, such as bitcoin, has proven particularly “magical” in the existing framework of bankruptcy law, which has not yet determined quite what bitcoin is—a currency, an intangible asset, a commodity contract, or something else entirely.

    Filed under:
    Japan, USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, White Collar Crime, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave), Bankruptcy, Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency
    Authors:
    Bryce A. Suzuki , Justin A. Sabin
    Location:
    Japan, USA
    Firm:
    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave)
    The Magic of Mt. Gox: How Bitcoin Is Confounding Insolvency Law
    2017-11-28

    Arthur C. Clarke famously observed: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Our regulatory, legislative, and judicial systems illustrate this principle whenever new technology exceeds the limits of our existing legal framework and collective legal imagination. Cryptocurrency, such as bitcoin, has proven particularly “magical” in the existing framework of bankruptcy law, which has not yet determined quite what bitcoin is—a currency, an intangible asset, a commodity contract, or something else entirely.

    Filed under:
    Japan, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave), Bitcoin
    Authors:
    Justin A. Sabin , Bryce A. Suzuki
    Location:
    Japan, USA
    Firm:
    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave)

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 294
    • Page 295
    • Page 296
    • Page 297
    • Current page 298
    • Page 299
    • Page 300
    • Page 301
    • Page 302
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days