Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Business Restructuring Review | March-April 2020
    2020-04-15

    In This Issue:

    U.S. Supreme Court: Creditors May Immediately Appeal Denials of Automatic-Stay Relief

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Title 11 of the US Code, SCOTUS
    Authors:
    Paul M. Green , Charles M. Oellermann , Dan T. Moss , Brad B. Erens , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Washington District Court Overturns Approval of Third-Party Releases in a Settlement Agreement and Related Free-and-Clear Sale
    2019-08-19

    For nearly 25 years, courts in the Ninth Circuit have consistently refused to sanction nonconsensual third-party releases as part of chapter 11 plans. A ruling recently handed down by the U.S. District Court for the District of Washington reaffirms and extends that proposition. In In re Fraser’s Boiler Serv., Inc., 2019 WL 1099713 (D. Wash. Mar.

    Filed under:
    USA, Washington, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Jones Day, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Tenth Circuit
    Authors:
    Daniel J. Merrett (Dan) , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Chapter 15 Recognition Denied Due to COMI Manipulation Scheme to Evade U.K. Judgment
    2016-04-01

    More than a decade after the enactment of chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code, issues pertaining to recognition of a foreign debtor’s bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding under chapter 15 have, in large part, shifted from the purely procedural inquiry (such as the foreign debtor’s center of main interests, or “COMI”) to more substantive challenges regarding the limits, if any, that chapter 15 places on U.S. bankruptcy courts. But as demonstrated by the recent ruling in In re Creative Finance Ltd. (In Liquidation), 2016 BL 8825 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2016), U.S.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Uniform Voidable Transactions Act Adopted in New York
    2020-04-15

    On July 16, 2014, the Uniform Law Commission (the "Commission") approved a series of amendments to the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (the "UFTA"), which at that time was in force in 43 states (all states except Alaska, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, New York, South Carolina, and Virginia).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, White Collar Crime, Jones Day, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Second Circuit Rules that Bankruptcy Code’s Fraudulent Transfer Recovery Provisions Can Reach Foreign Transferees
    2019-06-18

    The ability of a bankruptcy trustee to avoid fraudulent or preferential transfers is a fundamental part of U.S. bankruptcy law. However, when an otherwise avoidable transfer by a U.S. entity takes place outside the U.S. to a non-U.S. transferee—as is increasingly common in the global economy—courts disagree as to whether the Bankruptcy Code’s avoidance provisions apply extraterritorially to avoid the transfer and recover the transferred assets. Several bankruptcy and appellate courts have addressed this issue in recent years, with inconsistent results.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Charles M. Oellermann , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Funds earmarked by section 363 purchaser to pay creditors need not be distributed in accordance with Bankruptcy Code’s priority scheme
    2015-11-17

    A ruling recently handed down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit may provide significant flexibility to debtors in that circuit who are implementing sales of substantially all of their assets. In In re LCI Holding Company, Inc., 2015 BL 295784 (3d Cir. Sept.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Title 11 of the US Code, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Timothy Hoffmann , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Post-Merit, the Second Circuit Reaffirms Its Ruling That State Law Avoidance Claims Are Preempted by the Section 546(e) Safe Harbor
    2020-04-15

    In In re Tribune Co. Fraudulent Conveyance Litig., 946 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 2019), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reaffirmed, notwithstanding the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Merit Mgmt. Grp., LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc., 138 S. Ct. 883, 200 L. Ed. 2d 183 (2018), its 2016 decision that creditors' state law fraudulent transfer claims arising from the 2007 leveraged buyout ("LBO") of Tribune Co. ("Tribune") were preempted by the safe harbor for certain securities, commodities, or forward contract payments set forth in section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Title 11 of the US Code, US House of Representatives, SCOTUS
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas , Brad B. Erens
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Fraudulent Transfer Avoidance Recovery Not Limited to Total Amount of Creditor Claims
    2018-02-02

    Courts disagree as to whether the amount that a bankruptcy trustee or chapter 11 debtor-in-possession ("DIP" ) can recover in fraudulent transfer avoidance litigation should be capped at the total amount of unsecured claims against the estate. A Delaware bankruptcy court recently weighed in on this issue in PAH Litigation Trust v. Water Street Healthcare Partners, L.P. (In re Physiotherapy Holdings, Inc.), 2017 WL 5054308 (Bankr. D. Del. Nov. 1, 2017). Noting the absence of any guidance on the question from the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Jones Day, Debtor in possession, Title 11 of the US Code, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, US District Court for SDNY
    Authors:
    Jane Rue Wittstein , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Third Circuit approves structured dismissal of chapter 11 case that includes settlement deviating from Bankruptcy Code’s priority scheme
    2015-07-31

    A “structured dismissal” of a chapter 11 case following a sale of substantially all of the debtor’s assets has become increasingly common as a way to minimize costs and maximize creditor recoveries. However, only a handful of rulings have been issued on the subject, perhaps because bankruptcy and appellate courts are unclear as to whether the Bankruptcy Code authorizes the remedy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Charles M. Oellermann , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    U.S. Supreme Court: Creditors May Immediately Appeal Denials of Automatic-Stay Relief
    2020-01-24

    In Short

    The Situation. In Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether bankruptcy court orders conclusively denying relief from the Bankruptcy Code's automatic stay are immediately appealable.

    The Result. On January 14, 2020, the Court unanimously ruled that an order conclusively resolving a motion for relief from the automatic stay was immediately appealable, such that a later-filed appeal was untimely and must be dismissed.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Title 11 of the US Code, SCOTUS
    Authors:
    Brad B. Erens , Christopher Dipompeo
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 195
    • Page 196
    • Page 197
    • Page 198
    • Current page 199
    • Page 200
    • Page 201
    • Page 202
    • Page 203
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days