Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Lehman Brothers court, building on Semcrude and Swedbank decisions, denies triangular setoff by swap counterparty
    2011-10-11

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the Court), has held that section 553(a) of the Bankruptcy Code prohibits a swap counterparty from setting off amounts owed to the debtor against amounts owed by the debtor to affiliates of the counterparty, notwithstanding the safe harbor provision in section 561 of the Bankruptcy Code and language in the ISDA Master Agreement permitting the swap counterparty to effect “triangular” setoffs. In re Lehman Brothers Inc., Case No. 08-01420 (JMP)(SIPA) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. October 4, 2011).

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Debt, Common law, Title 11 of the US Code, Lehman Brothers, Delaware Supreme Court, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for SDNY
    Authors:
    Jeff J. Friedman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    ZING VII —implications for the bankruptcy remoteness of special purpose entities
    2011-09-28

    In re Zais Investment Grade Ltd. VII1 is the latest in a recent line of bankruptcy cases challenging bedrock assumptions regarding securitization special purpose entities (SPEs) and bankruptcy considerations in securitization transactions.2 Zais establishes precedent allowing a senior noteholder of a collateralized debt obligation (CDO) to place the CDO issuer in an involuntary chapter 11 bankruptcy in order to advance an asset management plan that would otherwise require supermajority approval of all noteholders (including all junior classes) under the related indenture.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Debt, Asset-backed security, Maturity (finance), Liquidation, Bad faith, Cashflow, Default (finance), Collateralized debt obligation, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Not all bankruptcy “core” proceedings are created equal: a limitation on state law lender liability claims in bankruptcy court after Stern v. Marshall
    2011-09-14

    The scenario has become all too familiar in recent years: a borrower defaults on a loan and, when the lender pursues the loan collateral through foreclosure or other proceedings, the borrower files for bankruptcy protection. More often than not, when the lender appears in bankruptcy court to pursue its interest in the collateral, the borrower counterattacks with a host of state law lender liability claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Interest, Tortious interference, Foreclosure, Default (finance), Title 11 of the US Code, US Constitution, US Congress, SCOTUS, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Seventh Circuit upholds right of secured creditors to credit bid under a Chapter 11 plan
    2011-07-21

    On June 28, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit became the latest circuit to weigh in on the hotly contested question of whether a debtor can deny a secured creditor the right to credit bid as part of a Chapter 11 plan providing for the sale of assets encumbered by the secured creditor’s liens. InIn re River Road Hotel Partners, LLC,1 the Seventh Circuit upheld the right of secured creditors to credit bid, a decision that runs directly contrary to recent opinions in the Third and Fifth Circuits.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Option (finance), Secured creditor, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Seventh Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    TOUSA fraudulent transfer decision reversed by district court
    2011-02-22

    Reversing a controversial decision and judgment of the bankruptcy court, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has held that a group of lenders who received payment in settlement of their defaulted debt from the proceeds of new loans secured by the assets of certain subsidiaries of TOUSA, Inc. which were not themselves liable on that debt, did not receive fraudulent transfers.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Foreclosure, Good faith, Default (finance), Subsidiary, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Southern District of Florida
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    FDIC board approves interim final rule on new liquidation authority and clarifies treatment of creditor claims
    2011-01-21

    The Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) voted on December 18 to approve an interim final rule clarifying how the agency will treat certain creditor claims under the new orderly liquidation authority established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Shareholder, Consumer protection, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Board of directors, Debt, Liquidation, Subsidiary, Pro rata, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA), Title 11 of the US Code, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA)
    Authors:
    Jeffrey M. Werthan
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Judge overseeing Lehman Brothers bankruptcy cases issues decision on setoff in bankruptcy and directs Swedbank AB to surrender post-petition deposits
    2010-05-14

    On May 5, the judge overseeing the bankruptcy case of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc issued an opinion refusing Swedbank AB's request to keep several million dollars in post-bankruptcy Lehman deposits as a setoff against pre-bankruptcy swap termination claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Debt, Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Unwitting beneficiaries of Ponzi scheme cannot discharge debt under Chapter 7
    2010-02-26

    Beneficiaries of a Ponzi scheme who were subsequently found liable to cheated investors under state securities laws could not discharge this liability under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma ruled.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Fraud, Beneficiary, Debt, Summary offence, Unjust enrichment, Bankruptcy discharge, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    CFTC issues statement regarding bankruptcy treatment of cleared-only contracts
    2008-10-03

    In an interpretive statement, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has taken the position that “cleared-only contracts,” over-the-counter contracts submitted for clearing through a futures commission merchant to a derivatives clearing organization, should be included within the definition of “net equity” for purposes of U.S. Bankruptcy Code provisions applicable to commodity brokers. The CFTC’s interpretation generally would treat cleared-only contracts in the same manner as exchange-traded futures contracts in the event of a futures commission merchant bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Clearing (finance), Commodity, Futures contract, Commodity broker, Title 11 of the US Code, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Treatment of customers and financial counterparties in stockbroker liquidations under SIPA and the Bankruptcy Code
    2008-06-04

    With the possibility of a major stock brokerage liquidation appearing more likely than it has been in recent periods, the effect of a liquidation on customers and financial counterparties has become of great interest to many of our clients and others.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Injunction, Security (finance), Swap (finance), Economy, Liquidation, Broker-dealer, Brokerage firm, Title 11 of the US Code, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Investor Protection Corporation, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 190
    • Page 191
    • Page 192
    • Page 193
    • Current page 194
    • Page 195
    • Page 196
    • Page 197
    • Page 198
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days