Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Third Circuit rules secured creditors do not have a right as a matter of law to credit bid in bankruptcy plan sale
    2010-03-25

    This week, in a 2-1 decision affirming the District Court’s reversal of a ruling of the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that secured creditors do not have a right as a matter of law to credit bid their claim at an auction pursuant to a plan of reorganization where the debtor intends to impose the plan on its secured creditors through a “cramdown” under section 1129(b)(2)(A)(iii) of the Bankruptcy Code; i.e., a plan providing the secured creditors with the “indubitable equivalent” of their secured claim.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Statutory interpretation, Interest, Secured creditor, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, US Congress, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, US District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Purchase money security interests include negative equity for bankruptcy cramdown purposes
    2010-03-08

    On March 1st, the Seventh Circuit held that negative equity is included in a creditor's purchase money security interest and is not subject to a bankruptcy court's cramdown authority under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. In re Aubrey Howard.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Bankruptcy, Title 11 of the US Code, Seventh Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Hong Kong considers Chapter 11 equivalent
    2009-12-23

    No Respite for Distressed Companies in Hong Kong

    In Hong Kong, a company that is financially distressed may generally only avoid being liquidated or wound up if it:

    Filed under:
    Hong Kong, Insolvency & Restructuring, Winston & Strawn LLP, Wage, Debt, Liquidation, Moratorium (law), Debtor in possession, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Second Circuit permits unsecured claim for post-petition attorneys’ fees authorized under a valid pre-petition contract
    2009-12-09

    In a recent holding that a creditor may collect, on an unsecured basis, post-petition attorneys’ fees under an otherwise enforceable pre-petition contract, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals followed a similar ruling by the Ninth Circuit earlier this year, adding to a conflict among the circuits on this issue.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Liquidation, Unsecured creditor, Title 11 of the US Code, Eighth Circuit, SCOTUS, Second Circuit, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Focus on Tax Controversy - November 2020
    2020-11-19

    In the wake of the recent economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, there will likely be a sharp rise in bankruptcy filings by businesses seeking to obtain relief from the burdens of excessive debt.1 1 Winston & Strawn’s Tax Controversy and Litigation Group litigates tax disputes in the bankruptcy courts and works in conjunction with the firm’s Bankruptcy Practice Group. Portions of this article were originally published by the author in 2008.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Winston & Strawn LLP, Coronavirus, Title 11 of the US Code, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Bankruptcy Court’s Jurisdiction to Resolve Tax Claims
    2020-11-19

    In the wake of the recent economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, there will likely be a sharp rise in bankruptcy filings by businesses seeking to obtain relief from the burdens of excessive debt.[1] The bankruptcy code is designed to provide debtors relief and protection from creditors, which includes the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).  One of the benefits of bankruptcy court protection is the automatic stay, which will prevent the IR

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Winston & Strawn LLP, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Coronavirus, Title 11 of the US Code, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Tax controversy and litigation newsletter
    2020-11-19

    TAX CONTROVERSY AND LITIGATION NEWSLETTER

    ----------

    Focus on Tax Controversy

    NOVEMBER 2020\\VOLUME 4\\ISSUE 3

    IN THIS ISSUE

    ARTICLES AND UPDATES Bankruptcy Court's Jurisdiction To Resolve Tax Claims2 FAQs Issued Under The CARES Act Invalid Under The APA8 Tax Court Concludes IRS Failed to Satisfy 675111

    Penalty For Failure To File Form 5471 Is Not Divisible 14 Sixth Circuit Rejects Taxpayer's Judicial Estoppel Claim17

    ABOUT US Winston & Strawn's Tax Controversy and Litigation Practice 20

    Editors 20

    Filed under:
    USA, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Winston & Strawn LLP, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Mediation, Coronavirus, Title 11 of the US Code, CARES Act 2020 (USA), Internal Revenue Service (USA), NLRB, Sixth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Employee Considerations in Corporate Restructurings
    2020-06-10

    The impact of COVID-19 is yet to be fully realized, and many companies are yet to consider restructuring as a means to survive the pandemic, but all companies and all creditors can benefit now from learning how employee matters are treated in a bankruptcy proceeding under chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (as amended, the Bankruptcy Code). This blog provides a high-level overview of some of the most material matters affecting an employee workforce in the context of a chapter 11 restructuring.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Winston & Strawn LLP, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Private equity, Collective bargaining, Coronavirus, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Carrie V. Hardman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    California’s AB 506 process: what creditors can expect in the wake of California municipal bankruptcies
    2012-09-18

    California’s AB 506 process was intended to help a municipality in restructuring its debt obligations and avoid bankruptcy. However, the lessons of the bankruptcies of the City of Stockton, the Town of Mammoth Lakes and the City of San Bernardino support the reality that a meaningful restructure requires material involvement by the major stakeholders. California’s recent wave of municipal bankruptcies tend to show that the AB 506 process has not changed this reality, but rather made a difficult process longer and more arduous.

    Filed under:
    USA, California, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Lobbying, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Craig A. Barbarosh , Karen B. Dine
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    U.S. Supreme Court upholds right of secured creditors to credit bid under Chapter 11 plan
    2012-06-04

    On May 29, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, resolved a high-profile circuit split regarding the right of secured creditors to credit bid in an asset sale under a chapter 11 plan. In RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank,1 the Court held that a debtor cannot deny a secured creditor the right to credit bid as part of a chapter 11 plan providing for the sale of assets free and clear of the secured creditor’s liens on those assets.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Secured creditor, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 189
    • Page 190
    • Page 191
    • Page 192
    • Current page 193
    • Page 194
    • Page 195
    • Page 196
    • Page 197
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days