Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    MHM Asian Legal Insights 第167号(2024年9月号) 【今月のトピック】タイ・インド・ベトナム・シンガポール・ミャンマー
    2024-09-20

    このたび、森・濱田松本法律事務所アジアプラクティスグループでは、東南・南アジ ア各国のリーガルニュースを集めたニュースレター、MHM Asian Legal Insights第167 号(2024 年 9 月号)を作成いたしました。今後の皆様の東南・南アジアにおける業務 展開の一助となれば幸いに存じます。 ※本レターに記載した円建て表記は、ご参照のために、各現地通貨を現在の為替レー トで換算したものとなります。 1. タイ: 個人情報保護法(PDPA)施行以来、初の行政罰が適用され た注目事例 タイの個人情報保護委員会(Personal Data Protection Committee:「PDPC」)は、2024 年 8 月 21 日、タイ個人情報保護法(Personal Data Protection Act:「PDPA」)の違反に よる初の行政罰を科したことを発表しました。PDPA の違反による行政罰の実際の適用 は、PDPA が 2022 年に全面的に施行されて以来初めての事例となり、現地でも注目さ れています。 PDPA の違反による初の行政罰の適用事例(「本件」)は、オンライン通販事業を行う 現地企業(「本企業」)から、詐欺的な Scam Call を行う詐欺グループに、大量の個人情 報が流出したという事例です。

    Filed under:
    India, Japan, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Public, Mori Hamada & Matsumoto
    Location:
    India, Japan, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam
    Firm:
    Mori Hamada & Matsumoto
    First Impressions: Singapore International Commercial Court Approves Cross-Border Prepackaged Scheme of Arrangement for Unregistered Foreign Company
    2024-09-20

    The Singapore International Commercial Court (the "SICC"), a division of the General Division of the High Court and part of the Supreme Court of Singapore, was established in 2015 as a trusted neutral forum to meet increasing demand for effective transnational dispute resolution. It recently considered, as a matter of first impression for the SICC, whether to approve a prepackaged scheme of arrangement for a group of Vietnam-based real estate investment companies under Singapore's recently enacted Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (the "IRDA").

    Filed under:
    Global, Singapore, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Dispute resolution, Insolvency, Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (Singapore), Singapore International Commercial Court
    Authors:
    Corinne Ball , Sushma Jobanputra , Vinay Kurien , Dan T. Moss
    Location:
    Global, Singapore
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    An updated look at Singapore’s DIP financing regime
    2024-08-15

    Pierre Dzakpasu, Anne Jesudason and Florence W Y Li, Mayer Brown

    This is an extract from the 2025 edition of GRR's The Asia-Pacific Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Global Restructuring Review, Due diligence, Insolvency, HSBC, Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (Singapore)
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Global Restructuring Review
    Cryptoasset recovery and restructuring: lessons from the crypto winter in Singapore
    2024-08-15

    Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara, Smitha Menon, Lionel Leo and Stephanie Yeo, WongPartnership LLP

    This is an extract from the 2025 edition of GRR's The Asia-Pacific Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

    Filed under:
    Asia-Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Global Restructuring Review, Bitcoin, Fintech, Cryptocurrency, Non-fungible tokens, FTX
    Location:
    Asia-Pacific, Singapore
    Firm:
    Global Restructuring Review
    Singapore: Singapore International Commercial Court recognises Garuda’s Indonesian restructuring in landmark decision
    2024-03-18

    In brief

    On 18 January 2024, the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) issued its decision in Re PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk [2024] SGHC(I) (“Re Garuda Indonesia“), which was the SICC’s first decision on an application under the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (as enacted in Singapore in the Third Schedule of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (2020 Rev Ed) (“Singapore Model Law“)).

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Insolvency, Singapore High Court, Singapore International Commercial Court
    Authors:
    Nandakumar Ponniya , Emmanuel Chua , Darrell Lee
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Singapore Court recognises Indonesian PKPU proceedings for the first time
    2024-03-19

    In a move that facilitates the seamless integration of cross-border insolvency proceedings between Singapore and Indonesia, Singapore’s International Commercial Court has for the first time granted recognition of Indonesian PKPU proceedings in Re PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk [2024] SGHC(I) 1.

    Filed under:
    Indonesia, Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Authors:
    Jonathan Tang , Daniel Waldek , Prawidha Murti
    Location:
    Indonesia, Singapore
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Singapore International Commercial Court Issues First Decision on Recognition of Cross-Border Bankruptcy Cases under Model Law
    2024-03-26

    Established in 2015 as a trusted neutral forum to meet increasing demand for effective transnational dispute resolution, the Singapore International Commercial Court (the "SICC") is a division of the General Division of the High Court and part of the Supreme Court of Singapore. On January 18, 2024, the SICC handed down its first insolvency-related ruling.

    Filed under:
    Global, Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Cross-border insolvency, UNCITRAL
    Authors:
    Sushma Jobanputra , Vinay Kurien , Dan T. Moss
    Location:
    Global, Singapore
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    To Be or Not to Be (Solvent) - A Comparative Analysis of Singapore, UK, US, and Australia on Recognising Foreign Proceedings under the UNCITRAL Model Law
    2024-04-02

    TO BE OR NOT TO BE (SOLVENT) - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SINGAPORE, UK, US, AND AUSTRALIA ON RECOGNISING FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE UNCITRAL MODEL LAW PIERRE DZAKPASU, ANNE JESUDASON, FLORENCE LI The recent case of Ascentra Holdings, Inc v. SPGK Pte Ltd [2023] SGCA 32 (Ascentra) has drawn a line in the sand in the Singapore court's interpretation of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (UNCITRAL Model Law), as incorporated in the Third Schedule of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (IRDA) to create the Singapore Model Law.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Global, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Cross-border insolvency, UNCITRAL, Singapore High Court
    Location:
    Australia, Global, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    When do directors owe duties to creditors and how is a breach of creditor duty assessed: Key takeaways from recent Singapore Court of Appeal Decision in Foo Kian Beng v OP3 International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) [2024] SGCA 10
    2024-04-05

    In the recent decision of Foo Kian Beng v OP3 International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) [2024] SGCA 10 (dated 27 March 2024), the Singapore Court of Appeal upheld a director’s breach of duty by authorising the payment of a dividend and the repayment of a loan to himself. The decision, considering Sequana, sheds further important light on the directors’ duty to consider or act in the interest of the company’s creditors, coined as “creditor duty”.

    The Facts – Briefly Stated

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Des Voeux Chambers
    Authors:
    José-Antonio Maurellet SC , Michael Lok
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Des Voeux Chambers
    The Interplay of Cryptocurrency with Insolvency Law: Singapore High Court clarifies that cryptocurrency liabilities are a debt under the Insolvency, Restructuring, and Dissolution Act 2018
    2024-03-08

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Banking, Compliance Management, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Oon & Bazul LLP, Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Non-fungible tokens, Insolvency, Singapore High Court
    Authors:
    Bazul Ashhab , Lionel Chan
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Oon & Bazul LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Current page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days