Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Lothian Oil: Fifth Circuit recharacterizes non-insiders’ debt claim as equity
    2011-10-19

    On August 9, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a non-insider's debt claim can be recharacterized as equity in Grossman v. Lothian Oil Inc. (In re Lothian Oil, Inc.).2 The Fifth Circuit, in reversing the district court, held that: (i) there is no per se rule limiting to insiders the recharacterization of debt claims as equity and (ii) non-insider debt claims may be recharacterized as equity under section 502(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Legal burden of proof, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Stefan W. Engelhardt , John A. Pintarelli
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP
    Fifth Circuit: recharacterization, it’s not just for insiders anymore
    2011-08-17

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Legal burden of proof, Maturity (finance), United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Matthew Ziegler
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Fifth Circuit rejects per se rule that recharacterization applies only to insiders
    2011-08-15

    In a recent ruling, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a per se rule that only corporate insiders can have their debt claims recharacterized as equity. Instead, in In re Lothian Oil Inc., 2011 WL 3473354 (5th Cir. Aug. 9, 2011), the Court of Appeals held that "recharacterization extends beyond insiders and is part of the bankruptcy courts' authority to allow and disallow claims under 11 U.S.C. § 502." Thus, all creditors, regardless of their insider status, are susceptible to having their claims recharacterized as equity.

    The Facts of the Case

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Royalty payment, Conflict of laws, Debtor, Interest, Federal Reporter, Debt, Legal burden of proof, Maturity (finance), US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Blanka Wolfe
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
    Separation of enforcement from ownership leaves no leg to stand on
    2007-10-30

    In a case involving a bankruptcy reorganization in which a trustee in bankruptcy was given the right to pursue claims of misappropriation or infringement (but not ownership of the bankrupt’s intellectual property), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the district court finding that the no trustee had standing to bring suit. Morrow, et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case Nos. 06-1512, -1518, -1537 (Fed. Cir., Sept. 19, 2007 (Moore, J.; Prost, J., dissenting).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, Litigation, McDermott Will & Emery, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Patent infringement, Beneficiary, Standing (law), Liquidation, Exclusive right, Microsoft, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    McDermott Will & Emery
    Identifying and dealing with a financially troubled franchisee
    2008-04-18

    Part I: Spotting a Financially Troubled Franchisee in Time to Do Something about It

    Filed under:
    USA, Franchising, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Accounts receivable, Option (finance), Franchise agreement, Cashflow, Default (finance), Leverage (finance)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Intellectual property in bankruptcy
    2008-06-20

    Intellectual property rights, such as copyrights, trademarks, and patents, are critical to the operation of many businesses. Often the rights to use intellectual property are dependent upon licenses granting a contractual right to the use of the intellectual property. The bankruptcy of an intellectual property licensor can substantially impact the business of the licensee and the continued right to the use of the licensed intellectual property. Similarly, a bankruptcy filing by a licensee may jeopardize important revenue streams, which a licensor of the intellectual property relies upon.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, Wiley Rein LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Breach of contract, Business judgement rule, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    IRS offers blueprint for claiming stock losses as deductions
    2010-02-23

    A newly released IRS letter ruling (PLR 201006003, Oct. 28, 2009) provides guidance on how a consolidated return group may obtain an ordinary loss deduction in liquidating an insolvent subsidiary. Although a write-off of worthless stock generally produces a capital loss deduction, Code Section 165(g)(3) converts these losses to ordinary deductions when they arise from a write-off of stock of an affiliated corporation.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Ballard Spahr LLP, Royalty payment, Security (finance), Dividends, Interest, Taxable income, Economy, Liquidation, Tax deduction, Holding company, Subsidiary, Write-off, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Authors:
    Wayne R. Strasbaugh
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Ballard Spahr LLP
    Surviving - prior bankruptcy does not preclude pursuit of music royalties
    2011-07-27

    Sullivan v. Jamison, No. 06 C 5240, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 8, 2011) (Coleman, J.).

    Judge Coleman denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment that defendants' counterclaims to music royalties from the group Survivor were stopped for failure to disclose them in bankruptcy petitions. In fact, both individual defendants had sufficiently identified their alleged rights to Survivor's music royalties in their bankruptcy petitions or amendments thereto.  

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Holland & Knight LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    R. David Donoghue
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Knight LLP
    Royalty Rights as Unsecured Claims: The Relevance of Mallinckrodt to M&A, Revenue or Royalty Interest Financings, and Other Transactions Involving Future Payment Streams
    2023-02-21

    Consider this scenario: A company sells intellectual property rights to a buyer that plans to develop the IP into a profitable product. The buyer pays a minimal upfront purchase price in cash, with the most valuable consideration taking the form of future “royalties” and/or “milestone payments” related to the development and sale of the product. Upon closing the buyer obtains ownership of the IP.

    Filed under:
    USA, Copyrights, Corporate Finance/M&A, Designs and trade secrets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Patents, Trademarks, Covington & Burling LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Covington & Burling LLP
    Texas Showdown Over Class Claims
    2018-01-23

    This past November, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas sided with the majority of circuit courts when it held (i) that bankruptcy courts may apply Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 to class proofs of claim and administrative proofs of claim, and (ii) that a putative representative may file a conditional claim on behalf of a putative class that may later be certified.

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Royalty payment, Class action, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Southern District of Texas
    Authors:
    Peter R. Morrison
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Current page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days