PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) v Saad Investments Company Limited (SICL) and Singularis Holdings Ltd (SHL)involved an application by PwC for the setting aside of orders made by the Supreme Court of Bermuda in favour of the liquidators that required the production of documents relating to SICL and SHL. Included among the grounds on which PwC relied to set aside the order were that:
Last 06 November 06, the Fourth Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice, in the judgement of the special appeal n° 1,733,685/SP, brought by Volkswagen Brazil's Automotive Industry Ltda. against Matalzul Industry and Commerce Ltda., understood that, even if there is an arbitration agreement between the parties, the bankruptcy filing based on default of credit title (in this case, duplicates under protest) does not need previous establishment of arbitration court.
Introduction
As extensively released in the press, the Brazilian air carrier Oceanair – Linhas Aéreas Ltda. (known as ‘Avianca’) filed for judicial reorganization, which is a debtorin-possession court supervised reorganization proceeding authorized under the Federal Law nr. 11,101 (‘Bankruptcy Law’).
Direito processual civil e tributário. Execução fiscal ajuizada contra pessoa jurídica falida. Recurso repetitivo (art. 543-C do CPC e Res 8/2008 - STJ)
A constatação posterior ao ajuizamento da execução fiscal de que a pessoa jurídica executada tivera sua falência decretada antes da propositura da ação executiva não implica a extinção do processo sem resolução de mérito.Recurso Especial 1.372.243
O Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo (TJ-SP) negou pedido da Mabe para manutenção de duas cláusulas do seu plano de recuperação judicial. Os desembargadores da 1ª Câmara Reservada de Direito Empresarial entenderam que os dispositivos dariam "superpoderes" à assembleia de credores. A fabricante de eletrodomésticos vai recorrer da decisão.
O Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo (TJ-SP) manteve a obrigação do Fundo Garantidor de Créditos (FGC) de restituir a dois clientes do extinto Banco BVA os valores de R$ 10 mil e R$ 94,5 mil, respectivamente. A Corte, porém, entendeu não ser devido danos morais. A decisão, da 37ª Câmara Direito Privado, reformou parte da sentença da 4ª Vara Cível do Foro Regional de Pinheiros, que havia fixado uma indenização de R$ 15 mil para cada um deles.
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York was recently presented in In re Rede Energia, S.A.with the question of whether a confirmed Brazilian reorganization plan for Rede Energia, S.A. should be enforced in the United States.
Background
In accordance with the Constitution, companies that want to contract with government entities must participate in a tender process (Article 37, XXI). Under the Law of Tenders (Law 8,666/1993) – which governs government procurement – a company must prove that it has the necessary technical and financial qualifications and that it has regularly met its tax and labour obligations in order to participate in a bid.
The chapter 15 cases of OAS S.A. ("OAS") and its affiliates represent the second time in less than one year that a U.S. bankruptcy court has been confronted with a serious challenge to the recognition of insolvency proceedings in Brazil by a group of U.S. creditors. The latest challenge focused on two separate lines of attack: (1) whether the "foreign representative" authorized to commence a chapter 15 case can be appointed by the company rather than the foreign insolvency court; and (2) whether Brazilian insolvency law is manifestly contrary to U.S. public policy.