De Wet Homologatie Onderhands Akkoord (WHOA) is inmiddels een jaar geleden (1 januari 2021) in werking getreden.[1] Met die inwerkingtreding werd het Nederlandse faillissementsrecht een herstructureringsmechanisme rijker. Een rechtspersoon in financieel zwaar weer kan daarmee - kort gezegd - zijn schulden herstructureren door het opstellen en aanbieden van een akkoord waaraan ook tegenstemmende schuldeisers kunnen worden gebonden middels een dwangakkoord buiten faillissement of surseance van betaling.
On May 7, 2021, we issued a legal alert regarding third-party releases as part of the plan of reorganization in the Perdue Pharma case. [Purdue Pharma: Is Protection of Third Parties by the Automatic Stay an Oxymoron?] The order confirming that plan was appealed and our subsequent legal alert dated December 21, 2021 discussed the decision by Judge Colleen McMahon of the U.S.
On September 1, 2021, the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling in the case of In Re Nichols. The Circuit Court held that a debtor has an absolute right—without exception—to dismiss his Chapter 13 bankruptcy case under Section 1307 (b) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware recently expressed its view regarding the reach of the “solvent debtor exception” in In re The Hertz Corp., et al. The solvent debtor exception is an equitable doctrine which supports the proposition that creditors are entitled to the full suite of their contractual rights if the debtor in bankruptcy is solvent.
A “federal [fraudulent transfer claim under Bankruptcy Code § 548] is independent of [a] state-court [foreclosure] judgment,” held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on Dec. 27, 2021. In reLowry, 2021 WL 6112972, *1 (6th Cir. Dec. 27, 2021). Reversing the lower courts’ approval of a Michigan tax foreclosure sale, the Sixth Circuit reasoned that “the amount paid on foreclosure bore no relation at all to the value of the property, thus precluding the … argument that the sale was for ‘a reasonably equivalent value’ under the rule of BFP v.
The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “SDNY”) has been a longstanding epicenter of Chapter 11 filings. Historically seen as one of the more pro-debtor forums in the country, large companies often filed in the SDNY to take advantage of that stance. Some debtors appear to have attempted to direct their cases to specific judges within the district who were seen as particularly pro-debtor. One recent example was the bankruptcy filing by OxyContin producer, Purdue Pharma.
Going, going, gone. Most people might associate those words with fine art, not bankruptcy. But in In re 388 Route 22 Readington Holdings, LLC, the question arose: is value reflected by an active, non-collusive auction, while not dispositive, strong evidence of fair value under section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code?
1. 2021 年を振り返って 2021 年に中国で最も注目を浴びた立法は「個人情報保護法」でした。また「データ安全法」も公布・施行されており、2017 年施行 の「ネットワーク安全法」と併せてデータ三法が出揃ったことになります。本稿でも紙数を割いて、それらの概要を紹介します。 そのほかにも、会社法、外商投資関連、環境法、破産法、各種取引法、知的財産、労働法、競争法等の各分野における重要な 立法や法改正が幾つもなされました。本稿では、2021 年における重要な立法や法改正を 2 回に分けて解説します。今回は、個人 情報保護法等を含むネットワーク情報関係、会社法分野、外商投資分野、環境法分野、破産法分野の重要立法等を取り上げま す。 2. ネットワーク情報関係 (1) 「中華人民共和国個人情報保護法」(国家主席令 91 号、2021 年 8 月 20 日公布、同年 11 月 1 日施行) ① データ三法に関する全体像 何度かの草案や意見募集を経て、ついに中国における個人情報保護法である中華人民共和国個人情報保護法(以下「個 人情報保護法」といいます。)が制定されました。これまで消費者権益保護法(2013 年改正)、権利侵害責任法(2010 年)といっ た個別法で規定されていた個人の情報保護について規定された点が最大の眼目といえます。
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3002.1 was implemented to protect debtors from unanticipated deficiencies in residential mortgage payments following a chapter 13 discharge, and the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico’s recent opinion in In re Feliciano Figueroa[1] illustrates how detrimental the rule can be to inattentive mortgage holders.
The legal market in Scotland has changed over the last year, although perhaps not to the extent that anyone would have predicted. Firms have, in general terms, coped well with remote working and are beginning to cope well with hybrid working too. Traditional streams of work have been maintained and while some practice areas, such as insolvency and restructuring, have been quieter than anticipated, that has not had a significant impact on the bottom line. So, what can we expect in 2022?
1. Insolvencies will rise – even if we don’t experience the “tsunami”