The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“SC”) has held that National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”) cannot exercise its residuary jurisdiction under Section 60(5)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) to adjudicate upon the contractual dispute between the parties.
簡介
最近在Re Hsin Chong Construction Co., Ltd. [2021] HKCFA 14一案中,終審法院推翻了原訟法庭及上訴法庭(「上訴庭」)的裁決。與上訴庭及原訟法庭的裁決相反,終審法院裁定,於新昌開始清盤後出售其在合營協議項下剩餘權利及權益的交易是無效的。
背景
新昌營造廠有限公司(「該公司」)及Build King Construction Limited(「Build King」)於2013年11月訂立一份合營協議(「合營協議」),以成立及經營一間合營公司(「合營公司」)。合營公司於2016年6月獲得一項大型政府項目合約,其中該公司佔65% 權益,Build King佔餘下35% 權益。
該公司於2017/2018年度開始面臨財政困難。2018年8月27日,該公司被入稟清盤,導致該公司的銀行帳戶被凍結。
Introduction
In the recent case of Re Hsin Chong Construction Co., Ltd. [2021] HKCFA 14, the Court of Final Appeal (“CFA”) overturned the decisions of the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal (“CA”) below. The CFA found, contrary to the CA and Court of First Instance, that the disposition of Hsin Chong’s residual rights and interests under a joint venture agreement after the commencement of winding up was void.
Background
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently rejected a borrower’s objections to a bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction and held that the doctrine of res judicata barred the borrower’s claim objection as it was ultimately based on the alleged impropriety of the creditor’s claim from a prior bankruptcy.
A copy of the opinion in BVS Construction v. Prosperity Bank is available at: Link to Opinion.
The Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) has, in its capacity as the regulator of non-banking financial companies and under the powers conferred to it pursuant to Section 45-IE (1) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (“RBI Act”), superseded the Board of Directors of RCAP (“Board”).
The press release of even date from the RBI also stipulates the following:
简介
最近在Re Hsin Chong Construction Co., Ltd. [2021] HKCFA 14一案中,终审法院推翻了原讼法庭及上诉法庭(「上诉庭」)的裁决。与上诉庭及原讼法庭的裁决相反,终审法院裁定,于新昌开始清盘后出售其在合营协议项下剩余权利及权益的交易是无效的。
背景
新昌营造厂有限公司(「该公司」)及Build King Construction Limited(「Build King」)于2013年11月订立一份合营协议(「合营协议」),以成立及经营一间合营公司(「合营公司」)。合营公司于2016年6月获得一项大型政府项目合约,其中该公司占65% 权益,Build King占余下35% 权益。
该公司于2017/2018年度开始面临财政困难。2018年8月27日,该公司被入禀清盘,导致该公司的银行帐户被冻结。
“Messrs. Woods and Wu are fraudsters,” Judge Christopher S. Sontchi declared in the opening salvo of his scathing opinion. According to the former Chief Judge of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Woods and Wu fraudulently obtained a Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan on behalf of Urban Commons Queensway, LLC, which indirectly operates the Queen Mary, a cruise ship turned hotel docked near Long Beach, CA.
A district court judge recently reversed and remanded a well-known bankruptcy decision discharging a significant student loan debt.
Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. Here are this week’s updates.
Monday, November 8, 2021
Antitrust
The problem of Non-performing Assets (NPAs) in the Indian banking system is one of its foremost predicaments.