Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Follow-up commentary on Indalex
    2011-04-21

    In a client update released earlier this month, we discussed the recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in the CCAA proceedings of Indalex Limited. In that case, the Court decided that Indalex’s pension plan wind-up deficiency claims had priority over Indalex’s CCAA secured lender in the context of that case. Of concern is the "chill" that decision may have on secured lending in Ontario to borrowers that sponsor defined benefit pension plans.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Collateral (finance), Accounts receivable, Mortgage loan, Defined benefit pension plan, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Royal Bank of Canada, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    James D. Gage , Kevin P. McElcheran
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Expanding the investigative powers of a CCAA monitor
    2021-10-08

    In the matter of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (the “CCAA”) of Bloom Lake, the Superior Court of Québec rendered a judgment regarding the expansion of the powers of the monitor in a context where a creditor refused to produce documentation requested by the debtors.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Gabriel Faure , Janie L.-Roy
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Alberta Court of Appeal confirms super-priority status of restructuring charges
    2019-09-04

    The ongoing priority dispute between deemed trusts created under federal “fiscal statutes” (being the Income Tax Act, the Canada Pension Plan Act and the Employment Insurance Act) and priming charges arising under restructuring and insolvency legislatio

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Walker W. MacLeod
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Permits Enforcement Against Insolvent Operator
    2018-03-07

    In a recent decision that is relevant to oil and gas receiverships, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench lifted a stay of proceedings against an insolvent operator to allow the non-operating party to enforce its right to take over operatorship pursuant to the CAPL 2007 Operating Procedure.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Walker W. MacLeod
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Third-Party Releases in CCAA Plans of Compromise and Arrangement
    2017-01-17

    It is well-established that Canadian courts have jurisdiction to approve a plan of compromise or arrangement under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act that includes releases in favour of third-parties. The leading decision on the issue remains Metcalfe & Mansfield Alternative Investments II Corp., which arose in response to the liquidity crisis that threatened the Canadian market in asset-backed commercial paper after the U.S.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Shareholder, Debtor
    Authors:
    Walker W. MacLeod , Andrew Foster
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Suspension denied: ONCA confirms that automatic stay pending appeal does not suspend the limitation period
    2013-10-22

    The recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in msi Spergel Inc. v. I.F. Propco Holdings (Ontario) 36 Ltd., 2013 ONCA 550 (“msi Spergel”) confirms that the Court will not suspend, extend or otherwise vary the general two-year limitation period under the Limitations Act, 2002 (the “Limitations Act”) unless there is express statutory authority to do so.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy, Statute of limitations, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Indalex priority case decided — Ontario Court of Appeal gives priority to pension plan deficiency over secured lenders
    2011-04-08

    This week, the Ontario Court of Appeal surprised many by deciding that in the context of the CCAA proceedings of Indalex, pension plan deficiency claims can have priority over security held by secured DIP lenders. The Court granted priority for the entire wind-up deficiency of two pension plans over the DIP lender’s security. If not reversed on appeal, the ruling creates a potential worst case scenario for secured lenders in Ontario and could affect availability of credit for all employers who provide defined benefit pension plans for their employees.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Conflict of interest, Credit (finance), Debtor, Fiduciary, Stakeholder (corporate), Defined benefit pension plan, Parent company, Secured loan, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Kevin P. McElcheran
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Supreme Court of Canada confirms priority status of restructuring charges over CRA deemed trusts
    2021-08-05

    The Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) has released its decision in Canada North, conclusively resolving the priority dispute between deemed trusts created under the federal “fiscal statutes” (being the Income Tax Act (the “ITA”), the

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Supreme Court of Canada
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Post-filing suppliers do not implicitly benefit from any priority on the proceeds of sales of assets in CCAA proceedings
    2019-09-03

    The Québec Court of Appeal confirmed that unpaid post-filing suppliers, which had neither sought a court-ordered charge to secure their post-filing claims nor availed themselves of their right to stop supplying goods or services to the debtor, cannot claim an implicit priority on the proceeds of sales of assets in proceedings under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings.

    Background: going-concern sales of optometry clinics

    Filed under:
    Canada, Quebec, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Debtor, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Gabriel Faure , Alain N. Tardif , Noah Zucker
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Top Insolvency Cases and Highlights from 2017
    2018-02-26

    Top Insolvency Cases and Highlights from 2017 With the passing of another year, McCarthy Ttrault's National Bankruptcy & Restructuring Group takes a look at the trends, leading cases and other insolvency highlights from 2017. This publication puts at your fingertips a summary of the year's biggest insolvency cases and developments from across the country and highlights some of the most talked-about cases and issues from 2017, including deemed trusts, the monitor's role in oppression actions, equitable subordination and more. This report was authored by Heather L.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Quebec, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy, Limited liability partnership, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of Canada
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 3580
    • Page 3581
    • Page 3582
    • Page 3583
    • Current page 3584
    • Page 3585
    • Page 3586
    • Page 3587
    • Page 3588
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days