Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Supreme Tax Court Abolishes German Restructuring Privilege
    2017-02-22

    Cancellation of debt a key element of most restructurings generally triggers taxable income. The German tax authorities had issued an administrative decree (the "Tax Restructuring Decree" - Sanierungserlass), however, declaring that, upon the satisfaction of certain requirements and conditioned on forfeiture of any loss carry forwards, the cancellation of debt income ("CODI") would not be taxed.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Authors:
    Tobias Geerling , Britta Grauke , Uwe Hartmann
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Insolvency clawbacks: are shareholder loans a 'gratuitous benefit'?
    2017-02-01

    Summary

    The German Federal Court has recently examined the treatment of shareholder loans and how these creditor claims are classified in the event of a company’s insolvency (decision by the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dated 13 October 2016 (file no. IX ZR 184/14)).

    Background

    Filed under:
    Germany, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing
    Authors:
    Dr. Alexander Senninger
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    Bundesfinanzhof verwirft Sanierungserlass
    2017-02-08

    Welche Folgen hat die Entscheidung für abgeschlossene Verfahren? Was bedeutet sie für die Zukunft?

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    Authors:
    Christian Sistermann , David Beutel , Stephan Eilers , Norbert Schneider , Dr. Jan Brinkmann , Christian Ruoff , Alexander Schwahn
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    Banking & Finance Update Dezember / December 2016
    2016-12-22

    Banking & Finance Banking & Finance Dezember / December 2016 4 | Editorial Fokus 6 | Verschärfung der Regulierung auf dem sog. Zweitmarkt – Anlageberatung und -vermittlung von Vermögensanlagen ab 2017 KWG-erlaubnispflichtig 8 | Anforderungen an ein schlüssiges Sanierungskonzept zur Verhinderung einer Insolvenzanfechtung aus Sicht der Gläubiger Aufsichtsrecht 10 | Zusätzliche Anforderungen an die Ausgestaltung einer Limitation Language aufgrund des Asset-Stripping-Verbots gemäß § 292 Kapitalanlagegesetzbuch (KAGB)?

    Filed under:
    Germany, Luxembourg, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Germany
    Location:
    Germany, Luxembourg
    Firm:
    CMS Germany
    Insolvency clawbacks: monies paid and returned prior to insolvency
    2017-01-10

    Summary

    A recent judgment (German FCJ, 10 September 2015, IX ZR 215/13) deals with the question whether the recipient of a payment may be subject to a clawback claim if he returned the received amount to the debtor before the opening of insolvency proceedings.

    Background

    Filed under:
    Germany, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing
    Authors:
    Anne Springob
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    German Insolvency Law : an overview.
    2016-08-26

    German Insolvency Law

    an overview.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Global, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Legal personality, Shareholder, Debtor, Market liquidity, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Pro rata, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    Germany, Global
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    The German Insolvency Statute and netting arrangements: two worlds collide
    2016-08-31

    Introduction

    A recent judgment (German FCJ, 9 June 2016, IX ZR 314/14) relates to the interface between the German master agreement for financial derivative transactions (GMA) and sec. 104 of the German Insolvency Statute (InsO).

    Background

    Filed under:
    Germany, Capital Markets, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing, Shareholder
    Authors:
    Anne Springob
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    CGZP-Nachforderungen: Keine persönliche Haftung des Geschäftsführers bei Insolvenz des Zeitarbeitsunternehmens
    2016-10-31

    OLG Naumburg verneint Haftung der Organe eines insolventen Zeitarbeitsunternehmens gegenüber den Einzugsstellen.

    Bislang ist von der Rechtsprechung nicht abschließend geklärt, ob eine persönliche Haftung der Organe eines Zeitarbeitsunternehmens wie der Geschäftsführung gegenüber den Einzugsstellen in Betracht kommt.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Company & Commercial, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Germany
    Authors:
    Dr. Alexander Bissels
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    CMS Germany
    The insolvency administrator’s licence for settlement and its impact
    2016-11-03

    Introduction

    The German FCJ (IX ZR 143/13, 17 December 2015) relates to the requirements and effects of a settlement between an insolvency administrator and the personally liable partners of an insolvent partnership.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing
    Authors:
    Anne Springob
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    Neues vom BGH zu genehmigungsfähigen Investitionsmaßnahmen
    2016-12-12

    Der Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) hat in einer Entscheidung im Frühjahr dieses Jahres sowie einer weiteren Entscheidung im Sommer seine bisherige Rechtsprechung zum Vorliegen genehmigungsfähiger Investitionsmaßnahmen nach § 23 Abs. 1 Anreizregulierungsverordnung (ARegV) fortgesetzt und weiter ausdifferenziert.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Advant Beiten
    Authors:
    Guido Brucker
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Advant Beiten

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1005
    • Page 1006
    • Page 1007
    • Page 1008
    • Current page 1009
    • Page 1010
    • Page 1011
    • Page 1012
    • Page 1013
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days