The Swiss court in Zug, the Handelsblatt, Trado GmbH, Bloomberg and a shareholder of Envion AG have now confirmed that the bankruptcy court of Zug decided to liquidate Envion AG on 14 November 2018.
As already reported, the reason for initiating liquidation was that Envion AG did not appoint an auditor within the time limit set by the court. Envion AG therefore suffers from a so-called "lack of organs" which, according to Swiss law, leads to the liquidation of the company in the absence of remedy.
48 IFLR/May 2015 www.iflr.com The collapse in 2001 of Switzerland’s national airline Swissair, until then regarded as a symbol of the country’s reliability and efficiency, sparked a debate over the need to amend Swiss insolvency laws. Criticism was raised that the Swiss Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law (DEBL) had proven ineffective in facilitating the restructuring of companies in distress and was not adequate to deal with the insolvencies of large groups of companies.
Introduction
The insolvency proceedings for the Swissair companies have yet again proved to be one of the biggest and most important cases in the history of Swiss insolvency law. The Federal Supreme Court recently rendered a groundbreaking decision in the liquidation proceedings for SAirGroup and changed its jurisprudence regarding the legitimacy of an insolvent company's estate to claim for damages incurred by company creditors.
Drawing on the experiences gained from the Swissair grounding in 2001, many critical voices have been raised that Swiss insolvency law should be revised and should focus more on the restructuring of companies rather than their liquidation. Now, 12 years after the commencement of the Swissair insolvency proceedings and after various discussions and negotiations in the Swiss parliament, the revised Swiss insolvency law finally entered into force as of 1 January 2014.
The debt restructuring proceedings of former national carrier Swissair are still ongoing and keeping the courts busy.
What are the options for companies in financial difficulty in Taiwan?
If the company is listed on the Taiwan stock exchange, then the company may pursue a formal reorganisation as set forth under Article 282 of the Company Act.
If a listed company (as referred to above) is unable to pursue reorganisation, and in respect of all other companies, a company will enter into a formal bankruptcy procedure under the Bankruptcy Act in order to implement an equitable and orderly repayment scheme amongst its creditors.
Thailand introduced reforms to its bankruptcy laws in 1998 in the aftermath of the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Those reforms introduced business reorganisation provisions similar to the Chapter 11 provisions of the US Bankruptcy Code. Further amendments have been made to the Thai bankruptcy laws, which are now governed by the Bankruptcy Act BE 2483 (1940) as amended by the Bankruptcy Act (No. 7) BE 2547 (2004).
The recent years’ crisis and economic sanctions have led many foreign companies to consider winding down their operations in Ukraine, including through liquidation of their businesses. Those who are familiar with the legislative nuances of closing down a business in Ukraine understand that the principle of “one dollar in – two dollars out” is very appropriate to describe the balance of efforts and costs for opening a business and winding it down (the proper and legal liquidation of a company).