The National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”) is an adjudicating authority in India responsible for deciding matters related to amalgamations, mergers, insolvency and restructuring processes. In deciding such matters, one critical function of the NCLT is to balance the commercial objectives of companies with the interests of public stakeholders and regulators, ensuring that corporate restructurings do not compromise public interest.
With the rising popularity of alternative dispute resolution globally (including in insolvency related cases), it is important to take stock of where the Cayman Islands currently stands (as a leading jurisdiction in cross-border insolvency and restructuring) on the use of mediation in this context.
引言
2018年10月，最高人民法院向全国人大常委会建议推动建立个人破产制度，完善现行破产法。2021年3月1日，深圳出台我国首部个人破产法规《深圳经济特区个人破产条例》；2023年，厦门中院开展具备个人破产部分功能的个人信用重塑工作的实践探索，出台《关于个人信用重塑工作指引（试行）》，推动个人信用重塑机制落地，让诚实而“不幸”的债务人“有路可走”。本文结合个人信用重整相关司法实践，以探明个人信用修复路径，为诚信债务人特别是民营企业经营者提供债务纾缓的制度化途径和法治化救济渠道。
一、我国个人信用修复法律渊源
二、个人信用重整司法案例
1. 全国首例个人破产重整案
深圳市民梁某某自2018年起开始与同事、朋友创业，因受市场及疫情影响，经营困难，无以为继。为继续生产经营，梁某某向银行、网贷公司陆续借贷以解决资金问题，债务总额累计达75万元。2021年3月10日梁某某因无力偿还全部债务向法院申请个人破产，同年5月法院受理本案，并指定破产管理人。
Il 27 settembre 2024 è stato pubblicato in Gazzetta Ufficiale il D. Lgs. 13 settembre 2024, n. 136 (“Correttivo-ter”), terzo – e attualmente ultimo – Decreto Correttivo al Codice della Crisi d’Impresa e dell’Insolvenza.
Il novello decreto correttivo ha apportato modifiche sostanziali a numerosi istituti del Codice della Crisi. Al netto di alcuni ritocchi di stile e di dettaglio, il Correttivo-ter, da un lato, recepisce talune prassi o risolve dubbi interpretativi e, dall’altro, introduce specifiche novità largamente attese dagli operatori.
On 13 December 2024, EU member states agreed on a ‘partial’ general approach to the harmonisation of insolvency law.
はじめに
本来は非適格組織再編であるものを形式的に適格組織再編の要件を充足させ適格組織再編とするなどの手法で租税回避が行われた場合、税務当局により「法人税の負担を不当に減少させる結果となると認められるもの」（法人税法132条の2）として更正処分が打たれ、その課税関係を否認（否定）されることがあります（同条を組織再編成に関する行為計算否認規定といいます。）。このような代表的な事例としては、ヤフー事件（最高裁平成28年2月29日第一小法廷判決）、TPR事件（東京地裁令和元年6月27日判決、東京高裁令和元年12月11日判決）が挙げられ、これらはいずれも繰越欠損金の引継ぎが否定された事案です。本稿で紹介するPGM事件（東京地裁令和6年9月27日判決）もグループ会社間の合併による繰越欠損金の引継ぎが問題となった事案ですが、行為計算否認規定を適用してなされた更正処分が初めて裁判所によって取り消された事案として注目に値します※1。
事案の概要
Terminating DoCA's (Part 2) – Unfair Prejudice or Injustice
Canstruct Pty Limited v Project Sea Dragon Pty Limited (No. 4) [2024] FCA 112 ("Canstruct")1
Commissioner of State Revenue v McCabe (No. 2) [2024] FCA 662 ("McCabe")
Academy Construction & Development Pty Limited [2024] NSWSC 808 ("Academy Construction")
Introduction and Brief Facts
The Kuala Lumpur High Court recently dismissed an application for a judicial management order and in its decision introduced procedural safeguards to prevent the abuse of the judicial management process.
A recent decision of the Commercial Sheriff Court at Perth in the case of Priority Construction UK Limited v Advanced Material Processing Limited, reported at [2024] SC PER 48, has confirmed the position in relation to the proper basis for liquidation petitions to be brought against debtor companies. The moral of this story is that liquidation petitions should not be used to try to recover a validly disputed debt - something that all creditors and practitioners should be alert to.
The facts
The Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) has published guidance (the Guidance) following the publication of the Sanctions (EU Exit) (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No.2) Regulations 2024 (the Regulations) on 14 November 2024. OFSI is the body with regulatory oversight of the financial sanctions regime and is responsible for its implementation and enforcement within the UK.