Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    UK Restructuring - Year in Retrospect
    2024-01-09

    UK Restructuring A YEAR IN RETROSPECT 2 Contents Introduction Our people UK team Matter Highlights UK Restructuring Employment UK Restructuring Section Header Section Header Contents 3 Robert Russell UK Head of Restructuring +44 (0)161 235 4147 [email protected] 2023 – Continued instability Casting our minds back to January last year, the economic outlook was fraught with uncertainty.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, DLA Piper, Supply chain, Fintech, Cybersecurity, HM Revenue and Customs (UK), Insolvency Service (UK), Companies Act 2006 (UK)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    DLA Piper
    2023 Bankruptcy Shocker: Third Circuit Lauding Disparate Results For Similarly Situated Claimants
    2024-01-09

    Here’s my biggest bankruptcy shocker from 2023:

    • the Third Circuit’s rationale for dismissing Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy.

    I’ll try to explain.

    Appalled

    I’m still appalled by the lack of concern, from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in its dismissal opinion, over these disparities it describes in results for similarly situated claimants:

    Filed under:
    USA, Nebraska, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Koley Jessen PC, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Donald L. Swanson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Koley Jessen PC
    Statutory demands: understanding their significance in business
    2024-01-10

    A statutory demand (“SD”) is a formal written request for payment of a debt, typically issued by a creditor to a debtor. This legal document serves as a precursor to more severe actions, such as winding up proceedings or bankruptcy. Understanding the key aspects of a SD is crucial for both creditors seeking repayment and debtors facing potential legal consequences.

    1. Purpose and legal basis

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Keystone Law, Statutory demand
    Authors:
    Matthew Hennessy-Gibbs , Ben Crowley
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Keystone Law
    No room for change- How Final is the Final Resolution Plan, Exploring the Practical Repercussions
    2024-01-10

    Introduction

    The modification or withdrawal of Resolution Plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code / IBC”) had always been a contentious subject, with the National Company Law Tribunal (“Adjudicating Authority / NCLT”) and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”) taking conflicting views in the past.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Sumit Attri , Devarshi Mohan , Priyanshu Pandey
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
    庭外债务重组方案的表决与约束力
    2024-01-08

    目前庭外债务重组的表决程序尚没有明确的强制性规定,其实质是债权人和债务人之间的协商合意,在债务人与债权人“单对单”的重组场景下,由债务人和债权人协商重组条件、签署重组文件,相关重组文件可以发生对债务人和债权人的约束。但在大型企业整体债务重组中,涉及较多的债务重组主体和数量较多的债权人。在各债权人存在不同诉求的情况下,可能无法达到百分之百债权人同意方案、签署重组协议,故如何高效、快速地完成整体重组方案的表决,以及表决通过的重组方案对投弃权票甚至明确反对的债权人是否有约束力,是债务重组实践中债务人和债权人均会关心且经常面临的实际问题。

    一、庭外债务重组方案表决的程序探讨

    (一)重组方案的表决程序概述

    Filed under:
    China, Insolvency & Restructuring, Zhong Lun Law Firm
    Authors:
    Haitao Wang , Tian Juan
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Zhong Lun Law Firm
    Luxembourg’s new Restructuring Law: what about the financial collateral?
    2024-01-08

    On 1 November 2023, the Luxembourg law of 7 August 2023 on business preservation and modernisation of bankruptcy law (the Restructuring Law) entered into force. Despite the new restructuring framework introduced thereby to provide relief to debtors in financial difficulties, the security interests granted under the Luxembourg law of 5 August 2005 on financial collateral arrangements (the Financial Collateral Law) remain a rock-solid tool offering legal certainty to lenders and practitioners.

    Filed under:
    European Union, Luxembourg, Insolvency & Restructuring, Loyens & Loeff, European Parliament
    Authors:
    Natalja Taillefer , Vassiliyan Zanev
    Location:
    European Union, Luxembourg
    Firm:
    Loyens & Loeff
    HFW Disputes Digest 2023
    2024-01-08

    HFW DISPUTES DIGEST 2023

    Welcome to the second annual Disputes Digest, in which we collate our 2023 global HFW LITIGATION and International Arbitration publications in one place.

    This edition includes updates from across our Disputes arena, including England and Wales, BVI, AsiaPac, and the Middle East.

    Filed under:
    European Union, Global, Hong Kong, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA, Arbitration & ADR, Banking, Capital Markets, Company & Commercial, Compliance Management, Derivatives, Environment & Climate Change, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, White Collar Crime, HFW, Know your customer, Blockchain, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Advertising, Climate change, Supply chain, Mediation, Fintech, Due diligence, Carbon neutrality, Cryptocurrency, ESG, Litigation funding, Anti-money laundering, Non-fungible tokens, Metaverse, Anti-bribery and corruption, Greenwashing, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Financial Conduct Authority (UK), Barclays, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (USA), Google, European Council, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA), Competition and Markets Authority (UK), HSBC, Monetary Authority of Singapore, Bank of England, Singapore International Arbitration Centre, FTX, Silicon Valley Bank, Arbitration Act 1996 (UK), Federal Arbitration Act 1926 (USA), Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (UK), UK Supreme Court
    Location:
    European Union, Global, Hong Kong, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    HFW
    In Appreciation of a Pirate
    2024-01-08

    As we turn to a new year, my wife and I like to reminisce about our best days and milestones of the prior year (for 2023, it was a huge celebration with our best friends for my wife’s birthday, an epic bike ride with our kids on a beautiful day in Kiawah, and seeing “the Boss” in concert in Greensboro). Professionally, I find myself thinking about my friend and mentor, George Cauthen, who reached a milestone and retired from the active practice of law in 2023.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Jody A. Bedenbaugh
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
    How is cryptocurrency treated as an asset in a bankruptcy proceeding in your jurisdiction?
    2024-01-08

    Written by- Kyle Broadhurst, BROADHURST LLC

    While the Cayman Court has not yet had the opportunity to rule on the matter, it is highly likely that cryptocurrencies will be treated as property of the company which the liquidators are empowered to collect and which is to be applied in satisfaction of the company’s liabilities.

    Filed under:
    Cayman Islands, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, IR Global, Cryptocurrency
    Location:
    Cayman Islands
    Firm:
    IR Global
    Personal Liability for Debt to the Registrar of Companies
    2024-01-03

    The Insolvency and Financial Rehabilitation Law came into effect in 2019. The new law added a new cause of action for imposing personal liability on a director or CEO of a corporation in insolvency in respect of damages caused to the corporation and to its creditors, insofar as such directors and officers failed to take action to minimize the scope of the corporation’s insolvency.

    Filed under:
    Israel, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Barnea Jaffa Lande, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Idan Miller , Hadar Eilon
    Location:
    Israel
    Firm:
    Barnea Jaffa Lande

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 104
    • Page 105
    • Page 106
    • Page 107
    • Current page 108
    • Page 109
    • Page 110
    • Page 111
    • Page 112
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days