Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    New rules for shareholder debt financings: reform of the law governing the equitable subordination of shareholder loans by the Limited Liability Company Modernization Act
    2008-05-29

    A main focus of the anticipated reform of the law governing limited liability companies by the draft Act on the Modernization of the Law on Limited Liability Companies and the Prevention of Abuse (generally referred to as the “MoMiG” or “Modernization Act”) is the new set of rules relating to shareholder debt financings.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Jones Day, Share (finance), Shareholder, Limited liability company, Debt, Credit risk, Economy, Promulgation, Chief executive officer
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    German Federal Supreme Court decides on set-aside of global assignment of trade receivables
    2008-01-17

    In a judgment of November 29, 2007 that is of particular interest to financial institutions involved in asset-based lending, the German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) allayed concerns that a global assignment (Globalzession)—the assignment of all existing and future trade receivables to a lender to secure loans—would not survive the insolvency of the respective originator.[1] This decision was eagerly awaited because various judgments of German Higher Regional Courts (Oberlandesgerichte) had raised concerns lately that the security interest over receivables created in the last th

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Collateral (finance), Accounts receivable, Liability (financial accounting), Secured loan, Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Comparison of Chapter 11 United States Bankruptcy Code
    2007-08-02

    Chapter 11 focuses on preserving reorganization or going concern value over liquidation value. As a corollary, Chapter 11 assumes that the most efficacious way to achieve that result is to retain management and enable multiple outcomes either through a plan of reorganization, a series of going concern sales and even a liquidating plan. Chapter 11 enables a wide range of proposals to be put into a reorganization plan, including having the company and its management survive the process.

    Filed under:
    France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Jones Day, Liquidation, Precondition, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Nichterfüllungswahl des Insolvenzverwalters in der D&O-Versicherung
    2019-08-05

    Mit rechtskräftig gewordenem Urteil vom 06.03.2019 (Az. 5 O 234/17) hat das Landgericht Wiesbaden entschieden, dass es dem Insolvenzverwalter und allen versicherten Personen verwehrt ist, Versicherungsschutz für Inanspruchnahmen zu verlangen, die einer Versicherungsperiode zuzuordnen sind, für die der Insolvenzverwalter die Nichterfüllung des D&O-Versicherungsvertrags gewählt hat.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP
    Authors:
    Dr. Daniel Kassing, LL.M.
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    Aktuelle Entwicklungen
    2017-05-22

    Reform des Insolvenzanfechtungsrechts

    Das Gesetz zur Reform des Insolvenzanfechtungsrechts ist am 05.04.2017 in Kraft getreten. Im Fokus steht mit § 133 InsO die sogenannte Voranfechtung, die bislang in ihrer Ausprägung durch die Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichtshofs in der Kritik stand. Im Ergebnis musste ein Gläubiger so bereits dann mit einer Insolvenzanfechtung durch den Insolvenzverwalter rechnen, wenn er seinem Schuldner eine Ratenzahlung gewährte.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP
    Authors:
    Dr Henning Schaloske , Daniel Kreienkamp
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    New legislation in Germany: SanInsFoG follows COVInsAG - which changes managers and directors and their D&O insurers need to consider
    2021-04-19

    The COVID-19 pandemic is also keeping legislators on their toes, who are continuing to try to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on the economy. The focus was initially on the temporary suspension of the obligation to file for insolvency by the COVID-19 Insolvency Suspension Act (COVInsAG). Following on from this, with the Act on the Further Development of Restructuring and Insolvency Law (SanInsFoG), which came into force on 1 January 2021, the legislator has further modified obligations of conduct and, correspondingly, the liability of managing directors in the crisis of the company.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP, Coronavirus
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    Coronavirus: Significant changes in German civil and insolvency law
    2020-03-31

    The Law to mitigate the consequences of the COVID 19 pandemic in civil, insolvency and criminal procedure law ("Gesetz zur Abmilderung der Folgen der COVID-19-Pandemie im Zivil-, Insolvenz- und Strafverfahrensrecht") was adopted by the German Bundestag on 25 March and approved by the Bundesrat representing the federal states on 27 March 2020. With its draft published by the German Federal government on 23 March 2020, the implementation was probably the fastest legislative procedure of such scope in the history of the Federal Republic.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Clyde & Co LLP, Coronavirus
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    Oberlandesgericht München bestätigt: Kein Versicherungsschutz für Ansprüche gemäß § 64 GmbHG
    2019-12-19

    Das Oberlandesgericht München hat in einem bisher unveröffentlichten Hinweisbeschluss[1] die Rechtsauffassung des Oberlandesgerichts Celle[2] und des Oberlandesgerichts Düsseldorfs[3] bestätigt, dass für Ansprüche des Insolvenzverwalters gegen Geschäftsführer wegen Zahlungen trotz Insolvenzreife kein Versicherungsschutz unter einer D&O-Versicherung besteht. Daneben hat das Oberlandesgericht München auch zur Verteilung der Darlegungs- und Beweislast in Abtretungskonstellationen Stellung bezogen.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP, Federal Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Dr Henning Schaloske
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    D&O insurance and section 103 InsO
    2019-08-05

    In a final ruling dated 6 March 2019 (Case ref.: 5 O 234/17), the Regional Court of Wiesbaden decided that the insolvency administrator and all insured persons are not entitled to claim insurance coverage for claims attributable to an insurance period for which the insolvency administrator has chosen not to fulfi l the D&O insurance contract.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP
    Authors:
    Dr. Daniel Kassing, LL.M.
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    Upheaval in the German Restructuring Market - Need-to-know Facts and Alternative Tools
    2017-02-16

    To date, a debt waiver has been frequently used as a tool to successfully restructure German based companies in financial difficulties. A decision of the German Federal Fiscal Court (Bundesfinanzhof) published on February 8, 2017 currently limits such an option, given that it held that one of the main instruments used by tax authorities to grant relief from an otherwise taxable cancellation of debt income (CODI) in the form of the so-called Restructuring Decree (Sanierungserlass) violates fundamental constitutional rights.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Latham & Watkins LLP, Federal Ministry of Finance (Germany)
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 114
    • Page 115
    • Page 116
    • Page 117
    • Current page 118
    • Page 119
    • Page 120
    • Page 121
    • Page 122
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days