Business Finance and Restructuring What will 2018 hold? Horizon scanning for 2018 Legal Outlook Legislative changes Reform of English corporate insolvency framework The Insolvency Service has yet to react to responses to its consultation in mid-2016 on significant reforms designed to improve the restructuring tools available to companies.1 We had expected the government to push this forward in 2017, but the reforms appear to have stalled and the issue was sadly missing from the Queen’s Speech.

In a highly-anticipated decision on a long-running bondholder dispute, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its judgment last week in Marblegate Asset Management LLC v Education Management Corp. It concluded that “Section 316(b) [of the US Trust Indenture Act 1939] prohibits only non-consensual amendments to an indenture’s core payment terms”, i.e. the amount of principal and interest owed and the maturity date.

Major legislative changes

Reform of English corporate insolvency framework

The Insolvency Service is reviewing responses to its consultation on significant reforms designed to improve the restructuring tools available to companies. These include:

On 22 November 2016, the European Commission announced a draft directive on insolvency, restructuring and second chance in the EU in the form of the EU Business Restructuring Directive (the “Proposed Directive“) which can be read here.

The European Commission Internal Market and Services DG has sent to the CEBS and CEIOPS Interim Working Committee on Financial Conglomerates a third call for technical advice on the Financial Conglomerates Directive.

View Call for technical advice on financial conglomerates, (PDF 554KB), 7 May 2008

The Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) has published an Issues Paper on 'Risk Management and Other Corporate Issues'. The paper is not a formal consultation. Instead, it is part of CEIOPS' preparation for future work under the Solvency II project.

The European Commission has published on its website an on-line questionnaire which aims to get opinions from all interested parties on the impact of Solvency II when compared to Solvency I. The closing date for completing the questionnaire is 23 March 2007.

What might be the funding risk?

A member state exit is likely to result in increased liquidity problems and less available funding as financial institutions manage their exposure to the Eurozone. Businesses may find that traditional sources of finance (loans, bonds etc) are less easy to obtain or raise.

Intra group funding may also be problematic if there are intra-company loans to subsidiaries located in risk member states and those subsidiaries are having difficulty meeting their payment obligations under such loans.

1. What is the risk if a counter-party is located in an exiting member state?

The European Commission has published a paper on its study covering pre-insolvency, early intervention, reorganisation and liquidation.