Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    $500 million bankruptcy dispute headed to Sixth Circuit
    2011-07-11

    The FDIC has recently appealed a loss it suffered at trial on the question of whether the debtor in bankruptcy (the holding company of a failed bank) made a “commitment” to maintain the capital of its subsidiary bank under Section 365(o) of the Bankruptcy Code.  After a week-long bench trial with an advisory jury, the Northern District of Ohio rejected the FDIC’s claim that a commitment had been made by the holding company to the Office of Thrift Supervision.  The F

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Holding company, Bench trial, Subsidiary, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Office of Thrift Supervision, Sixth Circuit, US District Court for Northern District of Ohio
    Authors:
    Pierre H. Bergeron
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Third Circuit reaffirms 1999 O’Brien decision regarding application of Bankruptcy Code Section 503(b) to break-up fees of stalking horse bidders
    2010-04-28

    In 1999 the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rendered its decision in Calpine Corp. v. O’Brien Environmental Energy, Inc. (In re O’Brien Environmental Energy, Inc.), 181 F.2d 527, denying Calpine Corporation’s request for the payment of a break-up fee after Calpine lost its effort to acquire the assets of O’Brien Environmental Energy out of bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Marketing, Limited liability company, Due diligence, Non-disclosure agreement, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Nicholas J. Brannick
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Bankruptcy issues in intercreditor agreements
    2009-05-31

    Introduction

    This article addresses bankruptcy issues commonly arising in connection with intercreditor agreements, and is intended to provide a general examination of provisions that relate specifically to bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings. By reviewing variations of these provisions that have appeared in negotiated second lien financings, the discussion provides a checklist that will be useful at the front end of deals of this kind.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Debt, Limited partnership, Default (finance), Leverage (finance), Convertible bond, Bank of America
    Authors:
    Jeffrey A. Marks
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Defining cryptocurrency in Russia: does it form part of the bankruptcy estate?
    2019-08-01

    We recently published a blog identifying issues which cryptocurrency pose in insolvencies; not least identifying and classifying it, how to take control of it and realising value for the insolvency estate.

    Given cryptocurrencies are global, the question of how to classify cryptocurrency on insolvency is not limited to just one jurisdiction.

    Filed under:
    Russia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Debtor, Cryptocurrency
    Authors:
    Sergey Treshchev
    Location:
    Russia
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    “You Can’t Always Get What You Want” - - Denial of Claimed Exemptions for Offshore Annuities
    2016-07-25

    The bankruptcy courts have a long history of being willing to use their judicial power under the Bankruptcy Code to prevent perceived efforts by debtors to inappropriately shield their assets from creditors. This is true even when the debtors employ structures and devices that are complex and crafted in seeming compliance with applicable law.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Tax exemption, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Debtor, Annuity, Life annuity, Tax haven, Securities fraud, Internal Revenue Service (USA), US Securities and Exchange Commission, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    G. Christopher Meyer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    It Should Be Settled Law - Unsecured Attorney’s Fees Claims Are Permissible
    2019-06-28

    In Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. PG&E, 549 U.S. 443 (2007), the Supreme Court held that bankruptcy law does not disallow a post-petition unsecured claim for attorney’s fees to the extent such claim is authorized by a pre-petition contract and not otherwise expressly disallowed. That pronouncement should have stopped all future litigation over the issue. That has not been the case.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Debtor
    Authors:
    Jeffrey N. Rothleder
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    That Didn’t Take Long: Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Garvin v. Cook Invs. NW is Challenged
    2019-06-14

    As noted in prior posts, the Ninth Circuit opened the door, albeit narrowly, to cannabis company bankruptcies when it issued its opinion in Garvin v. Cook Invs. NW on May 2, 2019. In Garvin, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the confirmation of a plan of reorganization proposed by the lessor to a marijuana growing operation.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Debtor
    Authors:
    Mark A. Salzberg
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Section 363(o) Implications: Bankruptcy Court Denies Debtor’s Request to Disband Consumer Creditors’ Committee
    2019-06-11

    On May 17, 2019, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York announced that the Official Committee of Consumer Creditors (the “Consumer Committee”) appointed in the In re Ditech Holding Corp. bankruptcy case would not be disbanded. Ditech, supported by the ad hoc group of term loan lenders (the “Ad Hoc Group”), had filed a motion requesting that the Consumer Committee be disbanded or alternatively have a limited scope and budget. After receiving objections from the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Kyle F. Arendsen
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    When do the Hong Kong Courts have jurisdiction to make a bankruptcy order against a foreign debtor?
    2019-05-30

    Hong Kong is known to be an international business hub, and also serves as a gateway to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, which has over 65 countries participating in developing infrastructure and investment initiatives between East Asia and Europe.

    High value transactions are commonplace and one way to protect the interests of Hong Kong businesses transacting with foreign companies is to seek a guarantee from the directors or shareholders of the foreign company.

    Filed under:
    Hong Kong, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Debtor
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Landlord’s Rights: Enforcement options in insolvency
    2019-03-07

    When dealing with a debtor or a tenant that has fallen behind with its payment obligations, one of the most cost effective ways of a creditor/landlord reducing its exposure against that entity will be to take advantage of a “self-help” remedy, such as taking possession of the entity’s assets and selling them in repayment of the sums owed.

    However, when the entity is the subject of insolvency proceedings, the availability of the various self-help remedies varies depending on:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Squire Patton Boggs, Debtor, Landlord
    Authors:
    Jon Chesman
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 398
    • Page 399
    • Page 400
    • Page 401
    • Current page 402
    • Page 403
    • Page 404
    • Page 405
    • Page 406
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days